Anacondas are four species of aquatic boa inhabiting the
swamps and rivers of the dense forests of tropical South
America. The Yellow Anaconda can be found as far south as Argentina.
There are two possible origins for the word 'anaconda.' It is perhaps an alteration of the Sinhalese word henakandaya, meaning 'whip snake', or alternatively, the Tamil word anaikondran, which means 'elephant killer'.[1] It is unclear how the name originated so far from the snake's native habitat; it
is likely due to its vague similarity to the large Asian pythons. Local names for the anaconda in South America include the Spanish term matatoro, meaning
'bull killer', and the Native American terms sucuri and yakumama. Anacondas as members of the boa family are
sometimes called water boas. The Latin name for Anaconda is Eunectes (from the Greek "ευνήκτης", meaning "good
swimmer").
Species
Size
There is some debate about the maximum size of anacondas, and there have been unverified claims of enormous snakes alleged to
be as long as 30–45 m (98.4–147.6 ft). According to Lee Krystek[2], a 1944 petroleum expedition in Colombia claimed to have measured a 11.43 m (37.5ft) specimen, but
this claim is not regarded as reliable; perhaps a more credible report came from scientist Vincent Roth, who claimed to have shot
and killed a 10.3 m (34 ft) anaconda in Guyana.
There are some reports from early European explorers of the South American jungles seeing giant anacondas up to 18.2m (60ft)
long, and some of the native peoples have reported seeing anacondas up to 15.2 m (50 ft) long,[3] but these reports remain unverified.
Another claim of an extraordinary size anaconda was made by adventurer Percy Fawcett.
During his 1906 expedition, Fawcett wrote that he had shot an anaconda that measured some 18.9 m
(62 ft) from nose to tail.[4] Once published, Fawcett’s
account was widely ridiculed. Decades later, Belgian zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans
came to Fawcett's defence, arguing that Fawcett's writing was generally honest and reliable.[5]
Historian Mike Dash writes[6] of claims of still larger anacondas, alleged to be as long as 30–45 m (100–150 ft) — some of the
sightings supported with photos (although those photos lack scale). Dash notes that if a 50–60 ft anaconda strains credulity,
then a 150 ft long specimen is generally regarded as an outright impossibility.
It should be noted that the Wildlife Conservation Society has, since the early 20th century, offered a large cash reward
(currently worth US$50,000) for live delivery of any snake of 30 feet or more in length. The prize has never been claimed. Also,
in a study of 1,000 wild anacondas in Brazil, the largest captured was 17 feet long.[7]
In captivity
There have been very few instances of anacondas being bred in captivity. In October 2007, the New England Aquarium in Boston achieved a breakthrough when it
was discovered that one of the aquarium's female anacondas was gravid with a brood of
eggs.[8]
References
- ^ Online Etymology
Dictionary. Douglas Harper (2001). Retrieved on 2007-09-01. “1768, probably a
Latinization of Sinhalese henacandaya "whip snake," lit. "lightning-stem." A name first used in Eng. to name a Ceylonese python,
it erroneously was applied to a large S.Amer. boa, called in Brazil sucuriuba. The word is of uncertain origin, and no snake name
like it now is found in Sinhalese or Tamil. Another suggestion is that it represents Tamil anaikkonda "having killed an
elephant."”
- ^ The Unmuseum: Big Snakes
- ^ Extreme Science: Which is the Biggest Snake?
- ^ Cryptozoology: Sucuriju Gigante, by Aaron Justice
- ^ Section Bernard Heuvelmans
- ^ Dash, Mike Borderlands: The Ultimate Exploration of the Unknown;
Overlook Press, 2000 ISBN 0-87951-724-7
- ^ .The Search for
the $50,000 Snake
- ^ "Mass. aquarium
houses pregnant anaconda", Yahoo! News, Yahoo! Inc., 2007-10-18. Retrieved on
2007-10-18. (English)
Bibliography
- Bernard Heuvelmans (1958). On the Track of Unknown Animals. Hill and
Wang. ISBN 0710304986.
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)