An argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas. Typically an argument map is a “box and arrow” diagram with boxes corresponding to propositions and arrows corresponding to relationships such as evidential support. Argument mapping is often designed to support deliberation over issues, ideas and arguments in Wicked problems.
Argument Maps are often used in the teaching of reasoning and critical thinking, and can support the analysis of pros and cons when deliberating over wicked problems.
Contents |
History
 |
This article is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. You can help by converting this article to prose, if appropriate. Editing help is available. (July 2009) |
The technique dates back at least to 1826, when a generalized illustration of an argument was published in Richard Whately's Elements of Logic.[1][2]
In the early 20th century John Henry Wigmore proposed an elaborate charting method in the context of reasoning with legal evidence, known as the Wigmore chart.
In 1958 Stephen Toulmin proposed an argument model that became influential in argumentation theory and its applications.
In 1998, a substantial series of maps released by Robert E. Horn (1998) stimulated widespread interest in the technique.
In 1999, articles in the journal New Scientist, Lingua Franca and the Philosophers' Magazine focused more attention on the project.[3]
Standards
Argument Interchange Format
The Argument Interchange Format, AIF, is an international effort to develop a representational mechanism for exchanging argument resources between research groups, tools, and domains using a semantically rich language. AIF-RDF, is the extended ontology represented in the Resource Description Framework Schema (RDFS) semantic language. Though AIF is still something of a moving target, it is settling down.[4]
See the original draft description (2006) and the full AIF-RDF Ontology Specifications in RDFS (.rdfs)
See also
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Argument maps |
- Argumentation theory
- Concept Map
- Universality (philosophy)
- Informal fallacy
- Mind Map
- Tim van Gelder
- Information graphics
References
- ^ Tim van Gelder (2009-02-15). "Earliest argument map?". http://timvangelder.com/2009/02/15/earliest-argument-map/. Retrieved 2009-06-20.
- ^ Whately, Richard (1867). Elements of Logic (9 ed.). London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer. p. 253. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=o7gIAAAAQAAJ&dq=Richard%20Whately%20Elements%20of%20Logic&pg=PA253. Retrieved 2009-06-20.
- ^ "Beyond words - 10 July 1999". New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16321944.700-beyond-words.html. Retrieved 2009-07-15.
- ^ "Contributing to the Argument Interchange Format". http://www.arg.computing.dundee.ac.uk/?page_id=197. Retrieved 2009-07-09.
Further reading
- van Gelder, Tim. What is Argument Mapping?
- Facione, P. and Facione N. (2007). Thinking and Reasoning in Human Decision Making: The Method of Argument and Heuristic Analysis.
- Harrell, Maralee (2005) Using Argument Diagramming Software in the Classroom. [1]
- Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. & Carr, C. (2003) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making Springer-Verlag, London.
- Twardy, Dr. Charles R. (2003) Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 27:2 June 2004. Preprints: [2] [3]
- Verheij, B. (2005) Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague.
- Freeman, James B. (1991) Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments[4]
- ter Berg, T. et al. (2009) Critical Thinking: Reasoning and Communicating with Rationale (also in Dutch)
- Argumentation Research Group blog
- Argument & Computation - a new research journal
- Argumap Yahoo Group
External links
Argument Mapping Software
- Araucaria (open source, cross platform/java)
- Argumentative (open source, windows); supports single-user, graphical argumentation
- Athena (free for non-commercial use, windows and perhaps Linux and Mac)
- bCisive (commercial, Windows); supports reasoning and decision making by mapping decision problems, options and arguments.
- Carneades (open source, cross platform/java fx); Argument mapping and evaluation, using proof standards; XML argument exchange
- Rationale (commercial, Windows); supports simple "Reasoning" maps and more advanced "Analysis" maps
Online, collaborative
- Argumentum
- bCisive Online
- Cohere
- debategraph.org
- truthmapping.com
- Compendium
- Argunet
- MIT's Deliberatorium
- debatewise.com
- CoPe_it
Academic
Conferences
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
