Ad Lapidem (Latin: "throwing stones" or "by stonethrowing") is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd without giving proof of its absurdity.[1] The form of argument employed by such dismissals is the argumentum ad lapidem.
Ad lapidem statements are fallacious because they fail to address the merits of the claim in dispute. Ad hominem arguments, which dispute the merits of a claim's advocate rather than the merits of the claim itself, are fallacious for the same reason. The same applies to proof by assertion, where an unproved or disproved claim is asserted as true on no ground other than that of its truth having been asserted.
Example
Albert claims that Bob has embezzled from his employer.
Carl replies, "That can't be true. Bob is not an embezzler, not now or ever. He simply wouldn't do such a thing. It's nonsense, a ridiculous claim on its face."
Because it denies Albert's claim, but gives no reasoning or evidence proving it untrue, Carl's reply is an argumentum ad lapidem in form. In making it, Carl has committed the ad lapidem fallacy, and we would be reasonable to discount it.
References
- ^ "Definitions of Fallacies", Dianah Mertz Hsieh, 20 August 1995
See also
 |
This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
