Atlantic Wind Connection

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Wikipedia on Answers.com:

Atlantic Wind Connection

Top
Atlantic Wind Connection
Location
From Northeastern New Jersey
Passes through South Jersey
Delaware
To Norfolk, Virginia
Ownership information
Owner Trans-Elect Development Company
Partners Google Energy
Good Energies
Marubeni
Construction information
Expected 2016
Technical information
Type offshore cable
Total length 350 mi (560 km)
Power rating 6,000 MW

Atlantic Wind Connection (AWC) is an electrical transmission backbone proposed by Trans-Elect Development Company that could be constructed starting in 2013 off the East Coast of the United States to service off-shore wind farms. Google Energy, the investment firm Good Energies, and Japanese trading firm Marubeni are investing "tens of millions of dollars" in the initial development stage of what could become a $5 billion project.[1]

The project continued to move forward as of May 2012.[2]

Contents

Project description

The Atlantic Wind Connection would begin with a first phase that would connect population and power transmission hubs in southern New Jersey and Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, the site of a proposed offshore wind project with a Power Purchase Agreement.[3] Power would be carried with a cable placed in trenches on the seabed 20 miles (32 km) offshore. Built at an estimated cost of $1.8 billion, phase one would begin construction in 2013 and could be ready to transmit power by 2016. The remaining southern connection to Norfolk, Virginia and an extension to Gateway Region of northern New Jersey and New York City would bring total construction costs to $5 billion and could be completed by 2021. The lead partners Google and Good Energies would each own 37.5% of the project, while Marubeni would have a 15% share.[4]

When fully completed, the project would deliver power ashore in southern Virginia, Delaware, southern New Jersey and northern New Jersey using 350 miles (560 km) of cable as a backbone that could be used by wind power systems built miles off of the Atlantic Ocean coast. Initially the system could be used to transport electricity from southern Virginia, where it is cheap, to the New York City area, where it is comparatively expensive.[4] The system would be able to transmit 6,000 megawatts of power and would allow existing energy supplies in Virginia to be transmitted north, bypassing the congested energy grid that exists in the Northeast, in an area that has been identified as one of the most congested portions of the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor.[4][5] The system's energy transmission capacity would be a "superhighway for clean energy" to serve approximately 1.9 million households, equal to 60% of the wind energy generation capacity that existed in the United States as of 2009.[6][5] Once the backbone is constructed, wind farms constructed well off the coast and almost invisible from the shore could be constructed and tap into the backbone. By constructing the cable beyond the 3 miles (4.8 km) limit where states wield authority, the system would be under the federal jurisdiction of the United States Department of the Interior.[4]

Opinions

The proposed system has been praised by environmentalists and federal regulators, with Jon Wellinghoff, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) calling it "one of the most interesting transmission projects that I've ever seen walk through the door", saying that the system "provides a gathering point for offshore wind for multiple projects up and down the coast." Former FERC chairman James J. Hoecker, who heads a group that represents power transmission system owners called the proposal "a necessary piece of what the Eastern governors have been talking about in terms of taking advantage of offshore wind" and noted that the system would help average out the variable output of wind farms. Google's director of its green business operations group, Richard L. Needham, called the project "an opportunity to kick-start this industry and, long term, provide a way for the mid-Atlantic states to meet their renewable energy goals." Melinda Pierce of the Sierra Club said that she had opposed other power line projects but would support the Atlantic Wind Connection, as "These kinds of audacious ideas might just be what we need to break through the wretched logjam".[4]

The concept of an offshore transmission backbone coordinated with several projects was an item in a speech by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar a week before AWC was announced,[7] and the concept is also a part of the national strategy on offshore wind power.[8]

Challenges

However, as the first such project of this nature, it poses significant risks of encountering unexpected technological challenges, bureaucratic backlogs and cost overruns. Virginia politicians have opposed previous proposals that would send low-cost energy out of the state. PJM Interconnection, the regional transmission organization that covers the area and is the world's largest competitive wholesale electricity market, would need to develop a formula to assess its customers for the costs associated with hooking up the new cables, increasing grid capacity and making the system more reliable.[4]

Resource area

The project would take advantage of the fact that the continental shelf slopes rather gradually in the Atlantic Ocean and that it would not be exposed to the freezing temperatures characteristic of the Great Lakes. The Mid-Atlantic Bight offers the potential of 60,000 megawatts of wind power generating capacity in an area that has relatively little renewable energy potential from other sources.[5]

The resource area, the Mid-Atlantic Bight, was identified and mapped in 2006[9] by Willett M. Kempton of the University of Delaware, and again in 2008 in the Journal of Marine Research.[10] 21 years of hourly data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration buoy anemometers show an extrapolated mean wind speed of 8.3m/s at 80m height, giving a capacity factor of 39% for oceanic turbines (36% for coastal). Considering three connected offshore sites in a larger area between North Carolina (34° N) and Massachusetts (43° N), zero power occurred 2% of the time.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ovide, Shira. "Google's Wind Project Got Lift From Vail Ski Trip" The Wall Street Journal, October 12, 2010. Accessed October 16, 2010.
  2. ^ Offshore Transmission Line Takes a Step Forward
  3. ^ Agreement reached on Delaware Wind Farm The Washington Post, June 24, 2008. Accessed October 16, 2010.
  4. ^ a b c d e f "Offshore Wind Power Line Wins Praise, and Backing" article by Matthew L. Wald in The New York Times October 12, 2010, Accessed October 12, 2010
  5. ^ a b c Needham, Rick. "The wind cries transmission", Google, October 11, 2010. Accessed October 12, 2010.
  6. ^ Wilgoren, Debbi. "Google helps finance 'superhighway' for wind power", The Washington Post, October 12, 2010.
  7. ^ Salazar, Ken. "Secretary Salazar Promotes Clean Energy, Signs Cape Wind Lease at AWEA Conference", United States Department of the Interior, October 6, 2010. Accessed October 16, 2010.
  8. ^ A national offshore wind strategy: Creating an offshore wind energy industry in the United States page 33 U.S. Department of Energy, 7 February 2011. Accessed: 8 February 2011.
  9. ^ a b Kempton et al. Large CO2 reductions via offshore wind power matched to inherent storage in energy end-uses (Word document), University of Delaware, November 4, 2006. Accessed October 16, 2010.
  10. ^ Garvine, Richard; Kempton, Willett (2008). "Assessing the wind field over the continental shelf as a resource for electric power" (PDF). Journal of Marine Research 66 (6): 751–773. ISSN 0022-2402. http://www.ceoe.udel.edu/windpower/docs/GarvineKemp-AssessingWind09.pdf. Retrieved 2009-11-30. 

External links

External images
Land congestion map

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights: