Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

 
Wikipedia: Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) is an administrative law body of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which decides issues of patentability. The Chief Administrative Patent Judge is Michael R. Fleming.[1]

Contents

Structure

The BPAI is comprised primarily of an Appeals Division and a Trial Division. The Appeals Division, with 69 Administrative Patent Judges, handles appeals of patent examiner rejections, with sections adjudicating different technology areas. The Trial Division, with 11 Administrative Patent Judges, handles contested cases or interference proceedings.[2] The BPAI is headed by a Chief Administrative Patent Judge, currently Michael R. Fleming, with a Vice Chief, currently James T. Moore. [3]

Procedures

An applicant can appeal the examiner's decision to the BPAI. The appeal procedure is described in section 1200 of the U.S. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). [4] Typically, appeals to the BPAI are conducted ex parte. Decisions of the BPAI are typically rendered as an opinion.

Appeals

Decisions of the BPAI can be further appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) under 35 U.S.C. § 141. The decisions of the CAFC may also be reviewed on a discretionary basis by the United States Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on the judicial standards for patentability.

The United States Congress, however, can change the patent laws and thus override a decision of the Supreme Court.

An alternative path is a civil action against the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia under 35 U.S.C. § 145. Any appeal arising from such a case would then be directed to the CAFC under 28 U.S.C. § 1295.

Constitutionality

In 2007, Professor John F. Duffy, a widely recognized patent law scholar, argued that, since 2000, the process of appointing judges to the BPAI has been unconstitutional, since the judges are appointed without approval by the U.S. Senate.[5]

References

  1. ^ Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
  2. ^ Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Organization Chart
  3. ^ Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
  4. ^ USPTO, Chapter 1200 Appeal, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure.
  5. ^ John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 2007, Patently-O Patent L.J. 21, or Duffy, John F., "Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?" . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1128311.

See also

External links


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences" Read more