|
|
The quality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words.
You can help Wikipedia by removing weasel words. |
A broadcast flag is a set of status bits (or a "flag") sent in the data stream of a digital television
program that indicates whether or not the data stream can be recorded, or if there are any restrictions on recorded content.
Possible restrictions include the inability to save an unencrypted digital program to a hard
disk or other non-volatile storage, inability to make secondary copies of recorded content (in order to share or archive),
forceful reduction of quality when recording (such as reducing high-definition video to the resolution of standard TVs), and inability to skip over commercials.
Where first used
In the United States, new television receivers
using the ATSC standard were supposed to incorporate this functionality by
July 1, 2005, but a federal court struck down the Federal Communications Commission's rule to this effect on May
6 of that year. The stated intention of the broadcast flag was to prevent copyright infringement, but many have asserted that broadcast flags interfere with the
fair use rights of the viewing public [1].
The FCC Broadcast flag ruling
Officially called "Digital Broadcast Television Redistribution Control," the FCC's rule is in 47 CFR 73.9002(b) and the
following sections, stating in part: "No party shall sell or distribute in interstate commerce a Covered Demodulator Product that does not comply with the Demodulator Compliance Requirements and Demodulator
Robustness Requirements." According to the rule, hardware must "actively thwart" piracy.
The rule's Demodulator Compliance Requirements insists that all HDTV
demodulators must "listen" for the flag (or assume it to be present in all signals). Flagged content must be output only to
"protected outputs" (such as DVI and HDMI ports with HDCP encryption), or in degraded form through analog outputs or digital outputs with visual resolution of 720x480
pixels (EDTV) or less. Flagged content may be recorded only by
"authorized" methods, which may include tethering of recordings to a single device.
Since broadcast flags could be activated at any time, a viewer who often records a program might suddenly find that it is no
longer possible to save their favorite show. This and other reasons lead many to see the flags as a direct affront to
consumer rights.
Particularly troubling to open source developers are the Demodulator Robustness
Requirements. Devices must be "robust" against user access or modifications so that someone could not easily alter it to ignore
the broadcast flags that permit access to the full digital stream. Since open-source device
drivers are by design user-modifiable, a PC TV tuner card with open-source drivers
would not be "robust". It is unclear whether binary-only drivers would qualify. Projects could also be affected at the
application level. In theory it would likely be illegal for open-source projects such as the MythTV project, which creates personal video recorder (PVR)
software, to interface with digital television demodulators.
Some companies currently manufacturing devices, such as the pcHDTV devices intended for the
Linux market, would likely be forced to halt production. This portion of the rule also effectively
prevents individuals from building their own high-definition television sets and receiving devices. (It may seem far-fetched to a
layman, but there have been many instances in the past where engineers have built their own analog TVs, and it follows that some
people would wish to continue such pursuits in the digital age. The technologies used will most likely be centered around
software-defined radio, fast ADCs and FPGA chips - tools with so
generic use their availability can not be effectively restricted.)
The GNU Radio project already successfully demonstrated that purely software-based
demodulators can exist and the hardware rule is not fully enforceable.
Current status
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the FCC had exceeded its
authority in creating this rule. The court stated that the Commission could not prohibit the manufacture of computer or video hardware without copy protection technology because the FCC only has authority to regulate
communications, not devices that receive communications. It is possible that a higher court may overturn this ruling, or the
United States Congress may grant such authority to the FCC. Some of the major
U.S. television networks have stated in the past that they will stop broadcasting
high-definition content if the rule does not go into effect. [citation needed]
As of June 21, 2005, there are rumors Hollywood is attempting
to sneak the Broadcast Flag back as a rider on the Senate Appropriation bill. [2]
On May 1, 2006, Sen. Ted Stevens inserted a version of the Broadcast Flag into the
Communications, Consumer’s Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006. The draft section can be
seen here [3], and the full text of the bill here
[4]. On June 22, 2006 Sen. John E. Sununu offered an amendment to strike the broadcast and radio flag[5], but this failed and the broadcast-flag amendment was approved by the
Commerce committee, who at the
same time voted down the network neutrality provisions [6]. Nonetheless, the overall bill was never passed, and thus died upon
adjournment of the 109th Congress in December 2006.
Related broadcast flag technologies
Radio broadcast flag and RIAA
With the coming of digital radio, the recording industry is attempting to change the ground rules for copyright of songs
played on radio. Currently, over the air (i.e. broadcast but not Internet) radio stations may play songs freely but
RIAA wants Congress to insert a radio broadcast flag. On
April 26, 2006, Congress held a hearing over the radio broadcast
flag. Among the witnesses were musicians Anita Baker and Todd Rundgren.
European Broadcast Flag
At present there is no equivalent signal defined in the European DVB standards. However, there have been recent moves in the
DVB to define such a flag for use on clear-to-air television broadcasts. While this will probably
include a "do not redistribute" bit similar to the American approach, the European public service broadcasters are likely to push
for additional signals to indicate that content should not be encrypted in receiver devices, and that such receivers
should also ignore any revocations while playing the specific content item.
How adherence to such a flag would enforced in a receiver is not yet clear. One candidate approach could be the DVB-CPCM
standard. There is no European equivalent to the US FCC to create and enforce regulations, so a coherent multinational legal
framework is hard to imagine at this time.
DVB-CPCM
The Digital Video Broadcasting organization is developing DVB-CPCM which allows broadcasters (especially PayTV broadcaster) far more control over the use of content on
(and beyond) home networks. The DVB standards are commonly used in Europe and around the world (for satellite, terrestrial, and
cable distribution), but are also employed in the United States by Dish Network. In Europe,
some entertainment companies are lobbying to legally mandate the use of DVB-CPCM in the next level of the controversial
EU
Copyright directive. Opponents fear that mandating DVB-CPCM will kill independent receiver manufacturers that use open
source operating systems (e.g., Linux-based set-top boxes.)
Should the US broadcast flag return, CPCM would be a candidate for addition to the Table A list of approved technologies for
enforcement in the US.
See also
Related intellectual property subjects
References
- ^ www.fcc.gov/ola/docs/chessen052605.pdf
- ^ US Senate Appropriation
bill
- ^ Communications, Consumer’s Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 (draft)
- ^ full text (Adobe
PDF format) of Communications, Consumer’s Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006
- ^ Sen.John E. Sununu amendment
- ^ network neutrality provisions
External links
Related to legal or tecnological status of the Broadcast flag
|
Broadcast Video Formats |
| Analog broadcast |
525 lines: NTSC •
NTSC-J • PAL-M
625 lines: PAL • PAL-N • PALplus • SECAM
Defunct systems: Pre-1940 • 405
lines • 819 lines • Baird-Nipkow • MAC •
MUSE
Multichannel audio: BTSC (MTS) • NICAM-728 • Zweiton (A2, IGR) • EIAJ
Hidden signals: Captioning • Teletext • CGMS-A • GCR • PDC • VBI • VEIL •
VITC • WSS •
XDS |
| Digital broadcast |
Interlaced: SDTV (480i, 576i) •
HDTV (1080i)
Progressive: LDTV (240p, 288p, 1seg) • EDTV (480p,
576p) • HDTV (720p, 1080p)
Digital TV standards (MPEG-2):ATSC,
DVB, ISDB, DMB-T/H
Digital TV standards (MPEG-4 AVC):DMB-T/H,DVB,SBTVD,ISDB
(1seg)
Multichannel audio: AAC (5.1) • Musicam • PCM • LPCM
Hidden signals: Captioning • Teletext • (CPCM/Broadcast flag) |
| Technical issues |
14:9 • MPEG transport • Standards
conversion • Video processing • VOD • HDTV blur |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)