(mathematics) A rule for differentiating a composition of functions: (d/dx) ƒ (g(x)) = ƒ′(g(x))·g′(x).
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: chain rule |
(mathematics) A rule for differentiating a composition of functions: (d/dx) ƒ (g(x)) = ƒ′(g(x))·g′(x).
| 5min Related Video: Chain rule |
| Wikipedia: Chain rule |
In calculus, the chain rule is a formula for the derivative of the composite of two functions.
In intuitive terms, if a variable, y, depends on a second variable, u, which in turn depends on a third variable, x, then the rate of change of y with respect to x can be computed as the rate of change of y with respect to u multiplied by the rate of change of u with respect to x. Schematically,

Contents |
The chain rule states that, under appropriate conditions,

which in short form is written as

Alternatively, in the Leibniz notation, the chain rule is

The chain rule can be applied to as many composed functions as needed:

In integration, the counterpart to the chain rule is the substitution rule.
The chain rule in one variable may be stated more completely as follows.[1] Let g be a real-valued function on (a,b) which is differentiable at c ∈ (a,b); and suppose that f is a real-valued function defined on an interval I containing the range of g and suppose further that g(c) is an interior point of I. If f is differentiable at g(c), then
is differentiable at x = c, and
Suppose that a mountain climber ascends at a rate of 0.5 kilometers per hour. The temperature is lower at higher elevations; suppose the rate by which it decreases is 6 °C per kilometer. To calculate the decrease in air temperature per unit time that the climber experiences, one multiplies 6 °C per kilometer by 0.5 kilometer per hour, to obtain 3 °C per hour. This calculation is a typical chain rule application.
Consider the function f(x) = (x2 + 1)3. Since f(x) = h(g(x)) where g(x) = U = x2 + 1 and h(U) = U3 it follows from the chain rule that
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
In order to differentiate the trigonometric function

one can write f(x) = h(g(x)) with h(x) = sin x and g(x) = x2. The chain rule then yields

since h′(g(x)) = cos(x2) and g′(x) = 2x.
Differentiate arctan(sin x).

Thus, by the chain rule,

and in particular,

The chain rule works for functions of more than one variable. Consider the function z = f(x, y) where x = g(t) and y = h(t), and g(t) and h(t) are differentiable with respect to t, then

Suppose that each argument of z = f(u, v) is a two-variable function such that u = h(x, y) and v = g(x, y), and that these functions are all differentiable. Then the chain rule would look like:


If we considered

above as a vector function, we can use vector notation to write the above equivalently as the dot product of the gradient of f and a derivative of
:

More generally, for functions of vectors to vectors, the chain rule says that the Jacobian matrix of a composite function is the product of the Jacobian matrices of the two functions:

Let f and g be functions and let x be a number such that f is differentiable at g(x) and g is differentiable at x. Then by the definition of differentiability,

where ε(δ) → 0 as δ → 0. Similarly,

where η(α) → 0 as α → 0. Define also[2] that

Now
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
where

Observe that as δ → 0, αδ / δ → g′(x) and αδ → 0, and thus η(αδ) → 0. It follows that

To prove the multivariate chain rule, we will deal with the case of functions of two variables; a similar proof can be constructed for functions of three or more variables. Let x(t), y(t) be differentiable functions of t and assume f(x, y) has a gradient. If we set Δx = x(t + h) − x(t) and Δy = y(t + h) − y(t), then we have:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
When x is constant, we can regard f(x,y) as a function fx(y) of y. Thus the limit on the right is equal to the derivative of fx(y(t)), which by the single variable chain rule is
.
To calculate the limit on the left, regard f(x,y + Δy) as a function fy + Δy(x) of x. By the mean value theorem, we can select a real number
such that the numerator on the left limit is equal to
. So the left limit is equal to
, which equals
Thus, it follows that

The chain rule is a fundamental property of all definitions of derivative and is therefore valid in much more general contexts. For instance, if E, F and G are Banach spaces (which includes Euclidean space) and f : E → F and g : F → G are functions, and if x is an element of E such that f is differentiable at x and g is differentiable at f(x), then the derivative (the Fréchet derivative) of the composition g o f at the point x is given by

Note that the derivatives here are linear maps and not numbers. If the linear maps are represented as matrices (namely Jacobians), the composition on the right hand side turns into a matrix multiplication.
A particularly clear formulation of the chain rule can be achieved in the most general setting: let M, N and P be Ck manifolds (or even Banach-manifolds) and let
be differentiable maps. The derivative of f, denoted by df, is then a map from the tangent bundle of M to the tangent bundle of N, and we may write

In this way, the formation of derivatives and tangent bundles is seen as a functor on the category of C∞ manifolds with C∞ maps as morphisms.
See tensor field for an advanced explanation of the fundamental role the chain rule plays in the geometric nature of tensors.
Faà di Bruno's formula generalizes the chain rule to higher derivatives. The first few derivatives are




This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| stochastic chain rule (mathematics) | |
| chain | |
| Reciprocal rule |
| How do you define the chain rule for the composition of three four and n-functions? Read answer... | |
| In cricket if batsman hit ball and ball away by unused helmet than how many run counted and what is rule or rule name and which match followed that rule or when? Read answer... | |
| When advertisers say Obey this one old or simple rule they never give a rule to obey they are always just selling something that has nothing to do with a rule What is up with that? Read answer... |
| How did the Norman Conquest set in motion a chain of events that changed English rule and law? | |
| All lipids 1. are soluble in nonpolar solvents 2.contain the ester functional group 3. follow the isopropyl rule 4. have long chain of fatty acid 5. all of these? | |
| I got a mini harley they call it mini bike how so you put a chain saw motor on it been tryn cant get it and where would i get a sprocket for a drive chain and not a cutting chain? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Chain rule". Read more |
Mentioned in