colossally abundant number
| Divisibility-based sets of integers |
| Form of factorization: |
| Prime number |
| Composite number |
| Powerful number |
| Square-free number |
| Achilles number |
| Constrained divisor sums: |
| Perfect number |
| Almost perfect number |
| Quasiperfect number |
| Multiply perfect number |
| Hyperperfect number |
| Unitary perfect number |
| Semiperfect number |
| Primitive semiperfect number |
| Practical number |
| Numbers with many divisors: |
| Abundant number |
| Highly abundant number |
| Superabundant number |
| Colossally abundant number |
| Highly composite number |
| Superior highly composite number |
| Other: |
| Deficient number |
| Weird number |
| Amicable number |
| Friendly number |
| Sociable number |
| Solitary number |
| Sublime number |
| Harmonic divisor number |
| Frugal number |
| Equidigital number |
| Extravagant number |
| See also: |
| Divisor function |
| Divisor |
| Prime factor |
| Factorization |
In mathematics, a colossally abundant number (sometimes abbreviated as CA) is a certain kind of natural number. Formally, a number n is colossally abundant if and only if there is an ε > 0 such that for all k > 1,
where σ denotes the divisor function. The first few colossally abundant numbers are 2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520, 5040, ... (sequence A004490 in OEIS); all colossally abundant numbers are also superabundant numbers, but the converse is not true.
Properties
All colossally abundant numbers are Harshad numbers.
Relation to the Riemann hypothesis
If the Riemann hypothesis is false, a colossally abundant number will be a counterexample. In particular, the RH is equivalent to the assertion that the following inequality is true for n > 5040:
where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.
This result is due to Robin[1].
Lagarias[2] and Smith[3] discuss this and similar formulations of the RH.
References
- ^ G. Robin, "Grandes valeurs de la fonction somme des diviseurs et hypothèse de Riemann", Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 63 (1984), pp. 187-213.
- ^ J. C. Lagarias, An elementary problem equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis, American Mathematical Monthly 109 (2002), pp. 534-543.
- ^ Warren D. Smith, A "good" problem equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis, 2005
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)







