Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Community psychology

 
Encyclopedia of Public Health: Community Psychology
 

Community psychology (CP), as a discipline, began in 1965 in Swampscott, Massachusetts, during a meeting of psychologists discussing training for community mental health. This group identified CP to be distinct from clinical psychology and community mental health. The original focus was on social and cultural influences on mental health, and it has since widened, with CP now being a discipline within psychology that examines ecological issues beyond the individual level, explores the value of diversity, challenges narrow unidimensional measures of health, and validates psychologists as agents of social changes. A public health approach was used to help provide the burgeoning field with an alternative to the medical model used in clinical psychology that focuses on illness, treatment, and recovery. This helped establish prevention as a founding principle of the field. CP has become a science of prevention, community intervention, and social epidemiology. Themes of the field include ecological perspectives, cultural relevance and diversity, and empowerment. Ecological perspectives emphasize social and environmental contexts at the individual, organizational, and community levels of analysis, and apply principles of resource mobilization, interdependence, and adaptation.

The following intervention and evaluation projects exemplify efforts in community psychology that have contributed to public health and welfare. The community lodge system was an alternative community living and employment setting for individuals with serious mental illness. The setting provided residents an opportunity to progressively operate and own their lodge including their own janitorial business. Another example is the Juvenile Diversion project. This project provided an alternative program for youth who would have otherwise entered the juvenile court system or a social service agency. The youth in the program were connected to a college student who worked with each youth to help them with school, social relations (peer and family), and accessing community resources. These projects are two examples within the field of community psychology designed to encourage consumer participation, build on their strengths and competencies, and promote health. Other research in community psychology has also helped provide public health with an empirical and theoretical basis for much of its work on community involvement and lay helpers, empowerment, and social capital.

Community Psychology and Public Health

Community psychology has many methods, topics, theories, and values in common with public health. Both fields emphasize skill development and utilize an approach that involves participants in program planning, implementation, and evaluation. They also employ qualitative and quantitative methods for process and outcome evaluation. Methods such as advocacy, community organizing, policy influence, and dissemination are used by both fields. Community psychologists focus on social determinants of health, including interpersonal support, stress and coping, citizen participation, social capital, wellness and health promotion, and social change in individuals, families, schools, churches, workplaces, and communities. Mutual and self-help approaches also overlap the two fields.

Community psychology and public health apply similar theories and conceptual models, including empowerment theory, social change theories, dissemination of innovation, and ecological theory. CP addresses cultural issues and diversity in both the application of theory and research and in intervention design. This is consistent with public health approaches because programs are developed and modified to match the values, norms, and beliefs of the audience, whether the focus is on ethnic, behavioral (e.g., homosexual, intravenous drug use), gender, or cultural differences. Both CP and public health consider social relationships, involve diverse community members, and study factors outside the individual when looking at the problems of individuals, so as to avoid blaming individuals solely for their problems.

Community psychology also differs from traditional public health in some ways. Much of the focus of CP is on mental health issues while public health stresses more traditional health concerns such as communicable diseases, cardiovascular disease, asthma, diabetes, and cancer. CP tends to focus more on behavioral aspects of health such as alcohol and drug use, risky sexual behavior, teen pregnancy, and violence. CP also includes topics that are considered fringe public health topics, such as homelessness, school dropout, and unemployment. Public health has a more practice-oriented approach to social problems, while CP emphasizes theory and social research. Both CP and public health, however, stress prevention, empowerment, promotion of healthy behaviors and contexts, and creating settings for community involvement and improvement.

Community Psychology Versus Health Psychology

Community psychology differs from health psychology in several ways. CP focuses on social change and social factors related to health outcomes, and pays more attention to context and change at organizational and community levels, while health psychology emphasizes individual health behavior and change. Theories applied in health psychology also focus on factors that predict behavior change, such as the health belief model, the theory of reasoned action, and stages of change. CP examines multiple determinants of health and the context in which behavioral choices are made, while health psychology focuses on individual motivation and cognitive factors associated with health behavior. Health psychology also tends to use approaches to intervention where participants are passive recipients of programs. CP approaches, like public health approaches, are more participatory in nature and involve program recipients in the design, implementation, and evaluation of programs. These two fields, however, overlap in some ways. Health psychology and community psychology include studies of social support and interventions to enhance support, and they both stress skill building, competence, and self agency. They also examine similar topics, but community psychology includes a broader array of issues that may extend beyond traditional definitions of health.

(SEE ALSO: Antisocial Behavior; Behavioral Determinants; Community Health; Community Mental Health Services; Ecosystems; Environmental Determinants of Health; Health Belief Model; Prevention; Social Determinants; Transtheoretical Model of Stages of Change)

Bibliography

Dalton, J. H.; Elias, M. J.; and Wandesman, A. (2001). Community Psychology: Linking Individuals and Communities. Stanford, CT: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, Inc.

Kelly, J. G. (1986). "An Ecological Paradigm: Defining Mental Health Consultation as a Preventive Service." Prevention in Human Services, 4:1–36.

Meritt, D. M.; Greene, G. J.; Jopp, D. A.; and Kelly, J. G. (1999). "A History of Division 27 (Society for Community Research and Action)." In Unification through Division: Histories of the Divisions of the American Psychological Association, Volume III, ed. D. A. Dewsbury. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Rappaport, J., and Seidman, E. (2000). The Handbook of Community Psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

— MARC ZIMMERMAN



Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
Medical Dictionary: community psychology
 

n.

The application of psychology to community programs for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of mental health.

 
Wikipedia: Community psychology
Top
Part of the series on
Community
Concepts

Sense of community
Social capital

Perspectives

Community psychology
Community studies

Kinds and types

Community of interest
Community of practice
Community of place

Development

Community development
Community organizing

Other

List of community topics
Community Portal

Join project

Community psychology deals with the relationships of the individual to communities and the wider society. Community psychologists seek to understand the quality of life of individuals, communities, and society. Their aim is to enhance quality of life through collaborative research and action.[1].

Community Psychology makes use of various perspectives within and outside of Psychology to address issues of communities, the relationships within them, and people's attitudes about them. Through collaborative research and action, community psychologists (practitioners and researchers) seek to understand and to enhance quality of life for individuals, communities, and society. Community psychology takes a public health approach and focuses on prevention and early intervention as a means to solve problems in addition to treatment. Rappaport (1977) discusses the perspective of community psychology as an ecological perspective with the person-environment fit being the focus of study and action instead of attempting to change the person or the environment when an individual is seen as having a problem.[2]

Closely related disciplines include Social Psychology, Political Science, Sociology, Social Work, and Community development.

No direct relation with community psychiatry.


Contents

Society for Community Research & Action

Division 27 of the American Psychological Association is the community psychology division of APA, called the Society for Community Research & Action (SCRA). The Society's mission is as follows:

The Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA) is an international organization devoted to advancing theory, research, and social action. Its members are committed to promoting health and empowerment and to preventing problems in communities, groups, and individuals. SCRA serves many different disciplines that focus on community research and action.[3]

The SCRA website has resources for teaching and learning community psychology, information on events in the field and related to research and action, how to become involved and additional information on the field, members and undergraduate and graduate programs in community psychology.

History of Community Psychology in the U.S.

In the 1950s and 1960s, many factors contributed to the beginning of community psychology in the U.S. Some of these factors include:

  • A shift away from socially conservative, individual-focused practices in health care and psychology into a progressive period concerned with issues of public health, prevention and social change after World War II[1]
  • The perceived need of larger-scale mental illness treatment for veterans[2]
  • Psychologists questioning the value of psychotherapy alone in treating large numbers of people with mental illness[2]
  • The development of community mental health centers and deinstitutionalization of people with mental illnesses into their communities[1]

Swampscott Conference

In 1965, several psychologists met to discuss the future of community mental health as well as discuss the issue of only being involved with problems of mental health instead of the community as a whole. The Swampscott Conference is considered the birthplace of community psychology. A published report on the conference calls for community psychologists to be political activists, agents of social change and “participant-conceptualizers.”[1]

Theories, Concepts & Values in Community Psychology

Ecological Levels of Analysis

James Kelly (1966; Trickett, 1984) developed an ecological analogy used to understand the ways in which settings and individuals are interrelated. Unlike the ecological framework developed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), the focus of Kelly's framework was not so much on how different levels of the environment may impact on the individual, but on understanding how human communities function. Specifically, Kelly suggests that there are 4 important principles that govern people in settings:

  • adaptation: i.e. that what individuals do is adaptive given the demands of the surrounding context
  • succession: every setting has a history that created current structures, norms, attitudes, and policies, and any intervention in the setting must appreciate this history and understand why the current system exists in the form that it does
  • cycling of resources: each settings has resources that need to be identified and possibilities for new resources to be developed; a resource perspective emphasizes a focus on strengths of individuals, groups, and institutions within the setting and interventions are more likely to succeed if they build on such existing strengths, rather than introduce new external mechanisms for change
  • interdependence: settings are systems, and any change to one aspect of the setting will have consequences for other aspects of the setting, so any intervention needs to anticipate its impact across the entire setting, and be prepared for unintended consequences.

First-Order and Second-Order Change

Watzlawick, et al. (1974) differentiated between first-order and second-order change and how second-order change is often the focus of community psychology.[4]

  • First-Order Change: Changing the individuals in a setting to attempt to fix a problem.
  • Second-Order Change: Attending to systems and structures involved with the problem to adjust the person-environment fit.

As an example of how these methods differ, consider homelessness. A first-order change to “fix” homelessness would be to offer shelter to one or many homeless people. A second-order change would be to address issues in policy regarding affordable housing.

Empowerment

One of the goals of community psychology involves Empowerment of individuals and communities that have been marginalized by society.

One definition for the term is “an intentional, ongoing process centered in the local community, involving mutual respect, critical reflection, caring, and group participation, through which people lacking an equal share of resources gain greater access to and control over those resources (Cornell Empowerment Group).[5]

Rappaport’s (1984) definition includes: “Empowerment is viewed as a process: the mechanism by which people, organizations, and communities gain mastery over their lives.”[6]

While empowerment has had an important place in community psychology research and literature, some have criticized its use. Riger (1993), for example, points to the paradoxical nature of empowerment being a masculine, individualistic construct being used in community research.[7]

Social Justice

A core value of community psychology is seeking Social Justice through research and action. Community psychologists are often advocates for equality and policies that allow for the wellbeing of all people, particularly marginalized populations.[1]

Diversity

Another value of community psychology involves embracing Diversity. Rappaport includes diversity as a defining aspect of the field, calling research to be done for the benefit of diverse populations in gaining equality and justice. This value is seen through much of the research done with communities regardless of ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability status, socioeconomic status, gender and age.[2]

Individual Wellness

Individual wellness is the physical and psychological wellbeing of all people. Research in community psychology focuses on methods to increase individual wellness, particularly through prevention and second-order change.[1]

Citizen Participation

Citizen participation refers to the ability of individuals to have a voice in decision-making, defining and addressing problems, and the dissemination of information gathered on them.[1] This is the basis for the usage of Participatory Action Research in community psychology, where community members are often involved in the research process by sharing their unique knowledge and experience with the research team and working as co-researchers.

Collaboration and Community Strengths

Collaboration with community members to construct research and action projects makes community psychology an exceptionally applied field. By allowing communities to use their knowledge to contribute to projects in a collaborative, fair and equal manner, the process of research can itself be empowering to citizens. This requires an ongoing relationship between the researcher and the community from before the research begins to after the research is over.[1]

Psychological Sense of Community

Psychological Sense of Community (or simply Sense of Community), was introduced in 1974 by Seymour Sarason[8]. In 1986 a major step was taken by David McMillan[9] and David Chavis[10] with the publication of their Theory of Sense of Community and Sense of Community Index. Originally designed primarily in reference to neighborhoods, the Sense of Community Index (SCI) can be adapted to study other communities as well, including the workplace, schools, religious communities, Community of interest|communities of interest, etc.

Empirical Grounding

Community psychology grounds all advocacy and social justice action in empiricism. This Empirical Grounding is what separates community psychology from a social movement or grassroots organization. Methods from psychology have been adapted for use in the field that acknowledge value-driven, subjective research involving community members. The methods used in community psychology are therefore tailored to each individual research question. Quantitative as well as qualitative methods and other innovative methods are embraced.[1]

See also

Peer-reviewed journals

The following journals provide peer-reviewed articles related to Community Psychology:

  • American Journal of Community Psychology (Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA) journal)
  • The Australian Community Psychologist (Journal of the Australian Psychological Society)[11]
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (international journal)
  • Journal of Community Psychology (international journal)
  • Journal of Rural Community Psychology (e-journal)[12]

In addition, there are a number of interdisciplinary journals, such as the Community Mental Health Journal,[12] with articles in the field of community health that deal with aspects of community psychology.

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Dalton, J.H., Elias, M.J., & Wandersman, A. (2001). "Community Psychology: Linking Individuals and Communities." Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
  2. ^ a b c d Rappaport, J. (1977). "Community Psychology: Values, Research, & Action". New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  3. ^ Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA). Division 27 of the American Psychological Association. Retrieved on: February 5, 2008.
  4. ^ Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). "Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution". New York: Norton.
  5. ^ Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Empowerment Theory: Psychological, Organizational and Community Levels of Analysis. "Handbook of Community Psychology", 43-63.
  6. ^ Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. "Prevention in human Services, 3, 1-7.
  7. ^ Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment? "American Journal of Community Psychology", 21(3), 279-292
  8. ^ Sarason, S.B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  9. ^ McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
  10. ^ Chavis, D.M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55-81.
  11. ^ APS College of Community Psychologists: Publications. Retrieved on: December 29, 2007.
  12. ^ a b Social Psychology Network Professional Journals. Retrieved on: December 19, 2007.

References

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). "The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design". Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Dalton, J.H., Elias, M.J., & Wandersman, A. (2001). "Community Psychology: Linking Individuals and Communities". Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
  • Chavis, D.M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55-81.
  • Kelly, J. G. (1966). Ecological constraints on mental health services. American Psychologist, 21, 535-539.
  • McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
  • Rappaport, J. (1977). "Community Psychology: Values, Research, & Action". New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. "Prevention in human Services, 3, 1-7.
  • Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment? "American Journal of Community Psychology", 21(3), 279-292.
  • Sarason, S.B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Trickett, E. J. (1984). Towards a Distinctive Community Psychology: An Ecological metaphor for Training and the Conduct of Research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 261-279.
  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). "Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution". New York: Norton.
  • Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Empowerment Theory: Psychological, Organizational and Community Levels of Analysis. "Handbook of Community Psychology", 43-63.

External links



 
 

 

Copyrights:

Encyclopedia of Public Health. Encyclopedia of Public Health. Copyright © 2002 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Medical Dictionary. The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Community psychology" Read more