Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Comparison of the imperial and US customary measurement systems

 
Wikipedia: Comparison of the imperial and US customary measurement systems

Both the imperial and United States customary systems of measurement derive from earlier English systems developed in England since the Battle of Hastings in 1066. They were a combination of the Anglo-Saxon and Roman systems.

Having this shared heritage, the two systems are quite similar, but there are differences. The US customary system is based on English systems of the 1700s, while the Imperial system was defined in 1824, after American independence.

Contents

Volume

A baby bottle that measures in all three measurement systems—metric, imperial (UK), and US customary.
A one US gallon gas can purchased near the USA-Canada border. It shows equivalences in imperial gallons and litres.

The imperial gallon was originally defined as the volume of 10 avoirdupois pounds of water under specified conditions. The imperial gallon (4.5460litres (L)) is 20% larger than the United States liquid gallon (3.785411784 L). The imperial bushel (36.36872 L) is 8 imperial gallons and is about 3% larger than the US bushel (35.23907016688 L)

The subdivision of the imperial gallon in British apothecaries' fluid measure differed in two important respects from the corresponding United States subdivision: the imperial gallon was divided into 160 fluid ounces, the United States gallon into 128 fluid ounces; and a "fluid scruple" is included.

These differences come from the various systems that were in use in Britain when the first colonies in North America were established. The American colonists adopted the English wine gallon of 231 cubic inches (3.78541178 litres), and used it for all fluid purposes. The English of that period used this wine gallon, but they also had the ale gallon of 282 cubic inches (4.62115205 litres). In 1824, the British adopted the British imperial gallon, defined as the volume of 10 pounds of water at a temperature of 62 °F, weighed in air with brass weights, by calculation equivalent to about 277.42 cubic inches (4.5461 L)—much closer to the ale gallon than the wine gallon. At the same time, they redefined the bushel to be 8 gallons.

Even under the new imperial system, wine volumes continued to be measured in the old 231-cubic-inch wine gallons (3.78541178 litres) for tax purposes, and this practice continued until the late 1990s.

As noted above, in the imperial British system the units of dry measure are the same as those of liquid measure. In the United States these two are different: the gallon and its subdivisions are used in the measurement of liquids, the bushel and its subdivisions in the measurement of certain dry commodities. The US gallon (3.785411784 L) is divided into four liquid quarts (946.352946 mL each) and the US bushel (35.23907016688 L) into 32 dry quarts (1.101220942715 L each) or 4 pecks (8.80976754172 L each). All these units of volume for liquid measures are about 20% larger in the imperial system than in the US system. However, the British fluid ounce is only about 96% of the US fluid ounce because there are 40 fluid ounces in the British quart but only 32 fluid ounces in the US quart.

In the imperial system an avoirdupois ounce of water at 62 °F (16.67 °C) has a volume of one fluid ounce, because 10 pounds is equivalent to 160 avoirdupois ounces and 1 imperial gallon is equivalent to 4 imperial quarts, or 8 pints. This convenient fluid-ounce-to-avoirdupois-ounce relation does not exist in the US system because a US gallon of water at 62 °F weighs about 8+13 pounds, or 133+13 avoirdupois ounces, and the US gallon is equivalent to 128 fluid ounces.

In the apothecary system of liquid measure the British add a unit, the fluid scruple, equal to one third of a fluid drachm (spelt dram in the United States) between their minim and their fluid drachm.

One noticeable comparison between the imperial system and the US system is between some Canadian and American beer bottles. Many Canadian brewers, like Labatt, package beer in 12-imperial-fluid-ounce bottles, which are 341 mL each. American brewers package their beer in 12-US-fluid-ounce bottle, which are 355 mL each. This results in the Canadian bottles being labeled as 11.5 fl.oz in US units when imported into the United States.

Comparison of current imperial, US and metric volume measures
Notes:
  • Approximate values are denoted with ≈
  • Exact values are denoted with ≡
  • Definitions are marked in bold
Unit name Imperial measures US fluid measures US dry measures Metric measures

fluid ounces
Imperial fluid ounce
(fl oz)

1 fl oz

0.96075994040 fl oz
0.94710208333 fl oz (food)

28.4130625 mL
0.0284130625 L

US fluid ounce
(customary)
(fl oz)

1.04084273079 fl oz

1 fl oz
0.98578431875 fl oz (food)

29.5735295625 mL
0.0295735295625 L

US fluid ounce
(food nutrition labeling)
(fl oz) (food)

1.05585239184 fl oz

1.01442068106 fl oz
1 fl oz (food)

30 mL
0.03 L


pints
Imperial pint
(pt)

20 fl oz
1 pt
0.5 qt
0.125 USgal

19.2151988081 fl oz
18.9420416667 fl oz (food)
1.20094992550 pt
0.15011874069 USgal

1.03205674349 pt
0.12900709294 USgal

568.26125 mL
0.56826125 L

US liquid pint
(pt)

16.6534836926 fl oz
0.83267418463 pt
0.10408427308 USgal

16 fl oz
15.7725491 fl oz (food)
1 pt
0.5 qt
0.125 USgal

0.859367007375 pt
0.107420875922 USgal

473.176473 mL
0.473176473 L

US dry pint
(pt)

19.3787794384 fl oz
0.96893897192 pt
0.12111737149 USgal

18.6183549784 fl oz
18.3536823786 fl oz (food)
1.16364718615 pt
0.14545589827 USgal

1 pt
0.5 qt
0.125 USgal

550.6104713575 mL
0.5506104713575 L


quarts
Imperial quart
(qt)

40 fl oz
1 qt
2 pt
0.25 USgal

38.4303976162 fl oz
37.8840833333 fl oz (food)
1.20094992550 qt
0.30023748138 USgal

1.03205674349 qt
0.25801418587 USgal

1136.5225 mL
1.1365225 L

US liquid quart
(qt)

33.3069673852 fl oz
0.83267418463 qt
0.20816854616 USgal

32 fl oz
31.5450982 fl oz (food)
2 pt
1 qt
0.25 USgal

0.859367007375 qt
0.214841751844 USgal

946.352946 mL
0.946352946 L

US dry quart
(qt)

38.7575588768 fl oz
0.96893897192 qt
0.24223474298 USgal

37.2367099567 fl oz
36.7073647572 fl oz (food)
1.16364718615 qt
0.29091179654 USgal

1 qt
2 pt
0.25 USgal

1101.220942715 mL
1.101220942715 L


gallons
Imperial gallon
(gal)

160 fl oz
4 qt
1 USgal

153.721590465 fl oz
151.536333333 fl oz (food)
1.20094992550 USgal

4.12822697395 qt
1.03205674349 USgal

4546.09 mL
4.54609 L

US liquid gallon
(gal)

133.227869541 fl oz
3.33069673852 qt
0.83267418463 USgal

128 fl oz
126.1803928 fl oz (food)
4 qt
1 USgal

3.437468029501 qt
0.859367007375 USgal

3785.411784 mL
3.785411784 L

US dry gallon
(gal)

155.030235507 fl oz
3.87575588768 qt
0.96893897192 USgal

148.946839827 fl oz
146.829459029 fl oz (food)
4.6545887446 qt
1.16364718615 USgal

4 qt
1 USgal

4,404.88377086 mL
4.40488377086 L


metric
litre
(l or L or dm3)

35.1950797279 fl oz
0.87987699320 qt
0.21996924830 USgal

33.8140227018 fl oz
33.3333333333 fl oz (food)
1.05668820943 qt
0.26417205236 USgal

0.90808298427 qt
0.22702074607 USgal

1000 mL
1 L

Length

The international yard is defined as exactly 0.9144 metres. This definition was agreed by the US, Canada, the UK, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand in 1959. However, the US continued to use its previous national definition of the length units for surveying purposes.

The US survey foot is defined so that 1 metre is exactly 39.37 inches; the international foot is exactly two parts per million shorter. The US survey foot and survey mile have been maintained as separate units for surveying purposes. This was done to avoid the accumulation of error that would follow replacing them with the international versions. This was not a problem for the United Kingdom, as the Ordnance Survey has been metric since before World War II.

The main units of length (inch, foot, yard and international mile) were the same in the USA, though some of the intermediate units, such as the (surveyor's) chain (22 yards) and the furlong (220 yards), were hardly used there.

At one time the nautical mile was defined differently in the UK and the US, but today both countries use the international definition of 1852 metres.

Mass

Both Britain and the US traditionally used three different weight systems. There was troy weight for precious metals and avoirdupois weight for most other purposes. The third, apothecaries' weight, has been superseded by the metric system.

One important difference is the widespread use in Britain of the stone of 14 pounds (6.35029318 kg) for body weight. This unit is not used in the United States, although its influence was seen in the practice until World War II of selling flour by a barrel of 196 pounds (14 stone). Another difference arose when Britain abolished the troy pound (373.2417216 g) on January 6, 1879, leaving only the troy ounce (31.1034768 g) and its decimal subdivisions, whereas the troy pound (of 12 troy ounces) and pennyweight are still legal in the United States, although they are not now greatly used.

In all the systems, the fundamental unit is the pound (lb), and all other units are defined as fractions or multiples of it. The tables of imperial troy mass and apothecaries' mass are the same as the corresponding United States tables, except for the British spelling "drachm" in the table of apothecaries' mass. The table of imperial avoirdupois mass is the same as the United States table up to 1 pound, but above that point the tables differ.

The imperial system uses a hundredweight of eight stone or 112 lb (50.80234544 kg), whereas a US hundredweight is 100 lb (45.359237 kg). In both systems, 20 hundredweights make a ton. In the US, the terms long ton (2240 lb, 1016.0469088 kg) and short ton (2000 lb; 907.18474 kg) are used to distinguish them. The term metric ton is also used to denote a tonne (1000 kg, 2204.622 lb), which is about 2% less than the long ton.

See also


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Comparison of the imperial and US customary measurement systems" Read more