Convertible arbitrage is a market neutral investment strategy often associated with
hedge funds. It involves the simultaneous purchase of convertible securities and the short sale of the same
issuer's common stock.
The premise of the strategy is that the convertible is sometimes priced inefficiently relative to the underlying stock, for
reasons that range from illiquidity to market
psychology. In particular, the equity option embedded in the convertible may be a source of cheap volatility, which convertible arbitrageurs can then exploit.
The number of shares sold short usually reflects a delta neutral or market neutral
ratio. As a result, under normal market conditions, the arbitrageur expects the combined position to be insensitive to
fluctuations in the price of the underlying stock. However, maintaining a market neutral position may require rebalancing
transactions, a process called dynamic delta hedging. This rebalancing adds to the return
of convertible arbitrage strategies.
As with most successful arbitrage strategies, convertible arbitrage has attracted a large
number of market participants, creating intense competition and reducing the effectiveness of the strategy. For example, many
convertible arbitrageurs suffered losses in early 2005 when the credit of General Motors
was downgraded at the same time Kirk Kerkorian was making an offer for GM's stock. Since
most arbitrageurs were long GM debt and short the equity, they were hurt on both sides. Going back a lot further, many such
"arbs" sustained big losses in the so-called "crash of '87". In theory, when a stock
declines, the associated convertible bond will decline less, because it is protected by its value as a fixed-income instrument:
it pays interest periodically. In the 1987 stock market crash, however, many convertible bonds declined more than the stocks into
which they were convertible, apparently for liquidity reasons (the market for the stocks being much more liquid than the
relatively small market for the bonds). Arbitrageurs who relied on the traditional relationship between stock and bond gained
less from their short stock positions than they lost on their long bond positions.
See also
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
