Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts

 
Wikipedia: Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 23, 1967
Decided June 12, 1967
Full case name Curtis Publishing Company v. Wally Butts
Citations 388 U.S. 130 (more)
94 S. Ct. 2997; 41 L. Ed. 2d 789; 1974 U.S. LEXIS 88; 1 Media L. Rep. 1633
Prior history Cert. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Subsequent history No. 37, 351 F.2d 702, affirmed; No. 150, 393 S.W.2d 671, reversed and remanded
Holding
Libel damages may be recoverable (in this instance against a news organization) if the injured party is a non-public official; but claimants must demonstrate a reckless lack of professional standards on the part of the organization in examining allegations for reasonable credibility.
Court membership
Case opinions
Plurality Harlan, joined by Clark, Stewart, Fortas
Concurrence Warren
Concur/dissent Black, joined by Douglas
Concur/dissent Brennan, joined by White
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I

Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (1967)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of First Amendment protection against defamation claims brought by private individuals.

Curtis, no. 37, held that, while news organizations were protected from liability when printing allegations about public officials under the Supreme Court's New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision (1964), they may still be sued by public figures if the information they disseminate is recklessly gathered and unchecked.

The damages awarded in the suit led to the closure of the Saturday Evening Post.

See also

References

  1. ^ 388 U.S. 130 (1967)



Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts" Read more