dialogic

The English terms dialogic and dialogism often refer to the concept used by the Russian philosopher Mikhail Bakhtin in his work of literary theory, The Dialogic Imagination. Bakhtin contrasts the dialogic and the "monologic" work of literature. The dialogic work carries on a continual dialogue with other works of literature and other authors. It does not merely answer, correct, silence, or extend a previous work, but informs and is continually informed by the previous work. Dialogic literature is in communication with multiple works. This is not merely a matter of influence, for the dialogue extends in both directions, and the previous work of literature is as altered by the dialogue as the present one is. In this sense, Bakhtin's "dialogic" is analogous to T. S. Eliot's ideas in "Tradition and the Individual Talent," where he holds that "the past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past." [1]

The term 'dialogic', however, does not just apply to literature. For Bakhtin, all language - indeed, all thought - appeared dialogic. This means that everything anybody ever says always exists in response to things that have been said before and in anticipation of things that will be said in response. We never, in other words, speak in a vacuum. As a result, all language (and the ideas which language contains and communicates) is dynamic, relational and engaged in a process of endless redescriptions of the world.

When scholars in France, the United States and United Kingdom in the 1970s and 1980s rediscovered Bakhtin's work, it seemed to fit with the then-nascent concepts of "intertextuality". European social psychologists also applied Bakhtin's work to the study of human social experience, preferring it as a more dynamic alternative to Cartesian monologicality.

See also

• Dialectic process vs. dialogic process
• Dialogical analysis
• Dialogical self
• Relational dialectics
• Intertextuality
• Heteroglossia[2]

References

Eliot, T. S. "Tradition and the Individual Talent." From The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. 1922. Accessed August 21, 2006.

Gillespie, A. (2006). Descartes’ demon: A dialogical analysis of ‘Meditations on First Philosophy.’[3] Theory & Psychology, 16, 761-781.

Hatch, M. J. & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organizational theory (2nd Ed.) pp. 205-206. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press

Marková,I.(Ivana Markova) (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

This literature-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v • d • e