Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act

 
Act of Congress:

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (1986)

Excerpt from the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act

Not later than six months after October 17, 1986, the Governor of each State shall appoint a State emergency response commission.... Not later than nine months after October 17, 1986, the State emergency response commission shall designate emergency planning districts in order to facilitate preparation and implementation of emergency plans.... Not later than 30 days after designation of emergency planning districts or 10 months after October 17, 1986, whichever is earlier, the State emergency response commission shall appoint members of a local emergency planning committee for each emergency planning district.

The Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (88 Stat. 2156) establishes a framework of state, regional, and local agencies that can inform the public about the presence of hazardous and toxic chemicals and provide for emergency response if accidental release of such chemicals threatens public health.

Congress passed EPCRA in response to the tragedy in Bhopal, India, in December 1984, in which many thousands were killed by an accidental release of a toxic chemical from a Union Carbide facility. Within the year, a similar but less serious accident occurred in Institute, West Virginia. The disorganized response of local authorities prompted further calls for systematic planning in anticipation of such incidents. Those in support of such planning also argued for improved disclosure to the public about the use, storage, and release of dangerous chemicals.

The act requires systematic planning at the state and local level to prepare responses to emergencies created by chemical releases. Under the act, facilities that exceed specified threshold amounts of hazardous chemicals must make recurrent reports to authorities. EPCRA limits the use of the "trade secret" protection, which allows facilities to withhold the specific chemical identity of the substances they use.

Legislative Debate

The legislative debate that led to the passage of EPCRA involved a much broader range of issues than those addressed in the act itself. EPCRA was closely related to the "Superfund" legislation, formally known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Congress enacted EPCRA as part of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. Intense controversy developed over the cost of the Superfund legislation. President Ronald Reagan threatened to veto the bill, and the bill's supporters planned to mount an effort to override that veto. However, Reagan signed the statute on October 17, 1986, as he had been urged to do by the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Enforcement

EPCRA is enforced in a variety of ways. The EPA may use a broad range of enforcement mechanisms, and those violating the act may be subject to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. State and local governments may also seek civil penalties or ask courts to issue injunctions to stop a particular action at a facility. Private individuals and other entities can also take action against alleged violators. The EPA must be notified sixty days before an enforcement action is filed by others against the owner or operator of a chemical facility. If the agency is "diligently" seeking enforcement then no other enforcement action is permitted against the owner.

Effectiveness

EPCRA has improved governmental planning to deal with releases of dangerous chemicals that may harm the public, and the reports required by the act have greatly expanded the amount of information available to the public about risks relating to such substances.

The Internet has made this information easy to obtain for those interested in receiving it. EPCRA's system of community notification uses the material safety data sheets (MSDS) prepared under the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA). Over the years that EPCRA has been in force, the reported releases of toxic chemicals into the environment have decreased significantly, suggesting that the statute has been effective in reducing the risks to communities. However, some have suggested that EPCRA is less effective than it seems. This is because the chemicals industry has to some extent shifted from using chemicals subject to EPCRA reporting to alternative dangerous chemicals that are beyond the reach of the statute.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
Top

The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 is a United States federal law passed by the 99th United States Congress located at Title 42, Chapter 116 of the U.S. Code, concerned with emergency response preparedness.

On October 17, 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). This act amended the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), commonly known as "Superfund".

A free-standing law, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) was commonly known as SARA Title III. Its purpose is to encourage and support emergency planning efforts at the state and local levels and to provide the public and local governments with information concerning potential chemical hazards present in their communities.

Contents

EPCRA Reporting Requirements

EPCRA does not place limits on which chemicals can be stored, used, released, disposed, or transferred at a facility. It only requires a facility to document, notify, and report information. Each section of the law, however, applies different requirements, has different deadlines and covers a different group of chemicals.

Emergency Planning (Sections 301-303)

These sections are to ensure that state and local communities are prepared to respond to potential chemical accidents. As a first step, each state had to establish a State Emergency Response Commission (SERC). In turn, the SERC designated local emergency planning districts. For each district, the SERC appoints, supervises and coordinates the activities of a Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC). The LEPC must, in turn, develop an emergency response plan for its district and review it annually. The membership of the LEPC includes representatives of public and private organizations as well as a representative from every facility subject to EPCRA emergency planning requirements.

The plan developed by the LEPC must:

  • identify affected facilities and transportation routes;
  • describe emergency notification and response procedures;
  • designate community and facility emergency coordinators;
  • describe methods to determine the occurrence and extent of a release;
  • identify available response equipment and personnel;
  • outline evacuation plans;
  • describe training and practice programs and schedules; and
  • contain methods and schedules for exercising the plan.

Determining if a facility is subject to the EPCRA emergency planning requirements is straightforward. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published a list of "extremely hazardous substances (EHS)." For each EHS, the list includes the name, the Chemical Abstract Service number of the substance, and a number called a threshold planning quantity (TPQ). The TPQ, expressed in pounds, is the critical number. If a facility has within its boundaries an amount of an extremely hazardous substance equal to or in excess of its threshold planning quantity, the facility is subject to the EPCRA emergency planning requirements and must notify both the SERC and the LEPC of this fact. The facility must also appoint an emergency response coordinator who will work with the LEPC on developing and implementing the local emergency plan at the facility.

Emergency Release Notification (Section 304)

A facility may be subject to these reporting requirements even if it is not subject to the provisions of Sections 301-303. This section applies to any facility which stores, produces or uses a "hazardous chemical" (any chemical which is a physical hazard or a health hazard) and releases a reportable quantity (RQ) of a substance contained in either of the following two tables published by the EPA in the Code of Federal Regulations:

    • list of extremely hazardous substances; and
    • list of CERCLA hazardous substances.

The RQ is the critical number that determines if a release must be reported. This is a number expressed in pounds that is assigned to each chemical in the above-mentioned tables. If the amount of a chemical released to the environment exceeds the reportable quantity, the facility must immediately report the release to the appropriate LEPC and SERC and provide a written follow-up as soon as practicable.

Of course there are exceptions. A release which results in exposure to persons solely within the facility boundary or is a federally permitted release does not have to be reported. Also, continuous pesticide and radionuclide releases meeting specified conditions are exempt.

Community Right-to-Know Reporting Requirements (Sections 311-312)

The purpose of these requirements is to increase community awareness of chemical hazards and to facilitate emergency planning. This section applies to any facility that is required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under its Hazard Communication Standard to prepare or have available a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for a hazardous chemical (See II above for definition) or that has on-site, for any one day in a calendar year, an amount of a hazardous chemical equal to or greater than the following threshold limits established by the EPA:

    • 10,000 pounds for hazardous chemicals; or
    • lesser of 500 pounds or the threshold planning quantity (TPQ) for extremely hazardous substances.

If a facility is subject to reporting under these sections, it must submit information to the SERC, the LEPC and the local fire department with jurisdiction over the facility under two categories: MSDS reporting and inventory reporting.

MSDS Reporting

MSDS reporting requirements specifically provide information to the local community about mixtures and chemicals present at a facility and their associated hazards. For all substances whose on-site quantities exceed the above threshold limits, the facility must submit the following:

  • initially a copy of the MSDS for each above-threshold chemical on-site or a list of the chemicals grouped into categories; and
  • within three months of any change, an MSDS or list for additional chemicals which meet the reporting criteria.

Inventory Reporting

Inventory reporting is designed to provide information on the amounts, location and storage conditions of hazardous chemicals and mixtures containing hazardous chemicals present at facilities. The inventory report has two forms. The Tier One form, the simpler of the two, contains aggregate information for applicable hazard categories and must be submitted yearly by March 1st. The Tier Two form contains more detailed information, including the specific names of each chemical. This form is submitted upon request of any of the agencies authorized to receive the Tier One form. It can also be submitted yearly in lieu of the Tier One Form.

Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting (Section 313)

The data gathered will assist in research and development of regulations, guidelines, and standards. Under this section, The EPA is required to establish the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI), an inventory of routine toxic chemical emissions from certain facilities. The original data requirements for the TRI, specified in SARA Title III, have been greatly expanded by the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990. The TRI must now also include information on source reduction, recycling and treatment.

To obtain this data, EPCRA requires each affected facility to submit a Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Form (Form R) to the EPA and designated state officials each year on July 1. A facility must file a Form R if it:

  • has 10 or more full-time employees;
  • is in a specified Standard Industrial Classification Code; and
  • manufactures more than 25,000 lb/year of a listed toxic chemical; or
  • processes more than 25,000 lb/year of a listed toxic chemical; or
  • otherwise uses more than 10,000 lb/year of a listed toxic chemical; or
  • manufactures, processes or otherwise uses a listed persistent bioaccumaltive toxic (PBT) chemical above the respective PBT's reporting threshold. PBT reporting thresholds can vary anywhere from 0.1 grams for dioxin compounds to 100 pounds for lead.

On October 29, 1999, EPA published a final rule (64 FR 58666) adding certain chemicals and chemical categories to the EPCRA section 313 list of toxic chemicals and lowering the reporting threshold for persistent bioaccumulative toxic (PBT) chemicals. On January 17, 2001 EPA published a final rule (66 FR 4500) that classified lead and lead compounds as PBT chemicals and lowered their reporting thresholds.

In December 2006, the EPA finalized a new TRI Rule which expands eligibility for use of the Form A Certification Statement in lieu of the more detailed Form R. Details about this final rule can be found on the EPA website under TRI Reporting.

Federal Agency Responsibilities Under EPCRA

Since April 30, 1993, the United States Air Force, in accordance with AFR 355-1, "Disaster Preparedness, Planning and Operations," has voluntarily complied with Sections 303 and 304 of EPCRA in spite of the fact that federal facilities were initially exempt from its requirements. On August 3, 1993, President Clinton signed Executive Order 12856, "Federal Compliance With Right-to-Know Laws and Pollution Prevention Requirements." This Executive Order requires federal agencies, including the Department of Defense, to fully comply with all provisions of EPCRA and the Pollution Prevention Act with one notable exception: the reporting requirements under Section 313. Currently, a non-federal facility must file a Form R only if it is in a specified Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code. This exclusion does not apply to federal agencies. Federal agencies will comply with the provisions of Section 313 regardless of the SIC code that applies to their facilities.

See also

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Act of Congress. Major Acts of Congress. Copyright © 2004 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act" Read more