Wikipedia:

Farebox recovery ratio

The farebox recovery ratio of a passenger transportation system is the proportion of the amount of revenue generated through fares by its paying customers as a fraction of the cost of its total operating expenses. Most systems aren't self-supporting, so advertising revenue and government subsidies are usually required to cover costs. The Hong Kong MTR Corporation is one of the few self-supporting transit systems in the world.

Need for government subsidy

There are several practical reasons for government subsidies of public transit. By subsidizing mass transit, it encourages ridership and subsequently lowers traffic congestion. Another benefit is lowering pollution from single occupant vehicles that are no longer on the roads. The third benefit is reducing infrastructure costs needed to build and maintain more street, highway, and freeway lanes associated with increased traffic congestion. These factors considered together also contribute to a better quality of life as defined by global quality of living measurements. [1]

However, some argue that there would be no need to subsidize mass transit if gasoline (petroleum) were not also subsidized. In 1965, the landmark "Urban Transportation Problem" by John Meyers argued that the urban transportation problem was actually a pricing problem. Consumers do not pay the actual cost for congestion and the government subsidizes all modes. This creates a modal imbalance between all modes but particularly between subsidized urban highways and transit. from A study by the International Center for Technology Assessment found that after accounting for government subsidies, pollution cleanup and other costs, the real price of gasoline is estimated to be somewhere between US$5.60 and US$15.37 per gallon.[2] Were gasoline sold within this range of prices, people might voluntarily drive less, choose more fuel-efficient vehicles, and use mass transit.

Farebox ratios around the world

The following table lists farebox ratios for some public transportation systems around the world.

Ratio of fares to operating costs for public transport systems (%)
System Ratio Year
Europe
Brussels 28% 1991[3]
Copenhagen 52% 1991[3]
London Underground 84% 1991[3]
Milan 28% 1991[3]
Munich 42% 1991[3]
RATP (Paris) 43% 1991[3]
Stockholm 30% 1991[3]
Vienna 50% 1991[3]
Zurich 66% 1991[3]
Japan
Osaka (Hankyu Railway) 123% 1991[3]
Osaka (OMTB) 137% 1991[3]
Teito RTA (now Tokyo Metro) 170% 1991[3]
North America
Atlanta (MARTA) 32.3% 2006[4]
Bay Area (BART) 56% 2005[5]
Chicago (CTA) 44.3% 2002[6]
Edmonton, Canada (ETS) 39.4% 2007 [7]
Cleveland (GCRTA) 21.5% 2002[6]
Detroit (DDOT) 13.9% 2002"#wp-_note-National_Transit_Database">[8]
Los Angeles (LACMTA) 30.6% 2004[9]
Las Vegas Monorail 56.0% 2006[10]
Maryland (MTA) 26.3% 2002[6]
Massachusetts Bay (MBTA) 43.7% 2002[6]
Miami-Dade Transit 16.1% 2002[6]
Montreal (SMT) 57.1% 2006 [11]
New York City subway 67.3% 2002[6]
Ottawa(OC) 43.2% 2007 [12]
New York/New Jersey (PATH) 41.0% 2002[6]
Philadelphia (SEPTA) 58.6% 2002[6]
Philadelphia/New Jersey (PATCO) 61.4% 2002[6]
Staten Island Railway 15.2% 2002[6]
Toronto Transit Commission 74.5% 2005 [13]
Washington, DC (WMATA) 61.6% 2002[6]

Notes

  1. ^ http://www.mercerhr.com/summary.jhtml?idContent=1173370>Mercer Human Resources Consulting QOL Reports c2005
  2. ^ http://www.icta.org/doc/Real%20Price%20of%20Gasoline.pdf
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l http://www.jrtr.net/jrtr29/pdf/f12_sho.pdf
  4. ^ MARTA FY2006 annual report
  5. ^ http://www.bart.gov/docs/AR2005.txt BART 2005 Annual Report
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1215/is_7_205/ai_n6150069
  7. ^ http://www.edmonton.ca/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_0_280_218_0_43/http%3B/CMSServer/COEWeb/getting+around/about+ets/2007+ETS+Operating+Budget.htm
  8. ^ http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/pubs/dt/2002/PDF_files/2002_Table_26.pdf
  9. ^ http://www.mta.net/about_us/finance/pdf/sandp2004.htm Standard & Poors Credit Rating 2004
  10. ^ Calculation based on figures of "$159,000 needed daily to cover operating costs and debt service" and "falling as much as $70,000 a day short". Sofradzija, Omar. "Monorail rating, ridership go down: Bleak outlook puts bond sale at risk", 2006-02-11. Retrieved on 2007-06-30. 
  11. ^ http://www.stcum.qc.ca/English/en-bref/a-rapfin06.pdf
  12. ^ http://www.octranspo.com/admin/Facts_Figures/Facts_funding.htm
  13. ^ http://www.toronto.ca/ttc/pdf/ttc_annual_report_2005.pdf

 
 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Farebox recovery ratio" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Farebox recovery ratio" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In: