Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

George Shiras, Jr.

 
US Supreme Court: Shiras, George, Jr.

(b. Pittsburgh, Pa., 26 January 1832; d. Pittsburgh, Pa., 2 August 1924; interred Allegheny Cemetery, Pittsburgh), associate justice, 1892–1903. George Shiras, Jr., was an obscure but nonetheless important justice in determining winning blocs on the Court and designating accepted constitutional interpretations. His career demonstrated the impact that background variables of family position, educational experience, and pre‐Court career can have on judicial attitudes.

The son of a wealthy, retired brewery merchant turned gentleman farmer, Shiras was raised to respect property and business entrepreneurship. Educated at Yale College, Shiras also spent a short time at the law school there. Throughout the Civil War he left military service to his brothers, concentrating instead on his expanding, lucrative corporate law practice. He refused positions in public service, rejecting a senatorial nomination in 1881 on the grounds that it would make him a pawn of Pennsylvania's Republican party machine.

Although Shiras lacked both judicial and public service experience, he was nevertheless nominated to the bench of the United States Supreme Court in July 1892 by President Benjamin Harrison. Two factors were critical in his selection: first, he was from the same geographic section as his predecessor on the Court; and second, he had demonstrated independence of the anti‐Harrison faction of the Pennsylvania Republican party.

Shiras brought to the Court a professional style and a social and economic ideology that shaped his and the Court's constitutional positions from 1892 to 1903. During this time the Court expanded judicial review of socioeconomic legislation through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Shiras's lawyerly approach to case facts and precedent meant that he did not always agree with the bloc of ultraconservative justices dedicated to the establishment of laissez‐faire economics through strict judicial review of state and national progressive reform laws (see Laissez‐Faire Constitutionalism). Thus in Brass v. North Dakota (1894) Shiras produced a liberal opinion upholding state police power to regulate business. Shiras's social and economic background, however, appeared directly in a long line of conservative decisions from United States v. E. C. Knight (1895) to Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897) that struck down national and state regulatory laws. In these cases Shiras voted to restrict the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and to use the freedom of contract doctrine to annul labor and other social legislation.

Identified by history as the justice who made the Sixteenth Amendment necessary, Shiras's legal reputation has suffered undeservedly. He was accused of having “Shirased,” that is, torpedoed, the most promising reform measure of the 1890s, the income tax. While it was true that he was one of the five justices voting to strike down the income tax in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895), Shiras himself was not apparently the pivotal vote. And this focus has obscured Shiras's liberal civil liberties decisions where he adopted a consistent due process approach and, as in Wong Wing v. United States (1896), protested denial of basic rights to individuals.

— Alice Fleetwood Bartee

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
US Government Guide: George Shiras, Jr., Associate Justice, 1892–1903
Top

Born: Jan. 26, 1832, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Education: Ohio University, 1849–51; Yale College, B.A., 1853; studied law at Yale and privately
Previous government service: none
Appointed by President Benjamin Harrison July 19, 1892, replaced Joseph P. Bradley, who died
Supreme Court term: confirmed by the Senate July 26, 1892, by a voice vote; retired Feb. 23, 1903
Died: Aug. 2, 1924, Pittsburgh, Pa.

George Shiras, Jr., was a successful lawyer before his appointment to the Supreme Court. However, he had no prior experience in government service, unlike all other Supreme Court justices.

Justice Shiras strongly supported property rights and economic liberty. Thus, he voted to strike down or limit federal and state regulations of businesses in the cases of United States v. E. C. Knight (1895) and Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897). In Wong Wing v. United States (1896), however, Justice Shiras wrote for the Court in protecting the rights of illegal aliens against unduly harsh punishments that disregarded 5th and 6th Amendment rights of due process and trial by jury.

Sources

  • Winfield Shiras, Justice George Shiras, Jr. of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1953)
Wikipedia: George Shiras, Jr.
Top
George Shiras, Jr.


In office
July 26, 1892 – February 23, 1903 (retired)
Nominated by Benjamin Harrison
Preceded by Joseph Philo Bradley
Succeeded by William R. Day

Born January 26, 1832(1832-01-26)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Died August 2, 1924 (aged 92)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Spouse(s) Lillie E. Kennedy
Religion Presbyterian

George Shiras, Jr. (January 26, 1832 – August 2, 1924) was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States who was nominated to the Court by Republican President Benjamin Harrison. At that time, he had 37 years of private legal practice, but had never judged a case. He remains the only Supreme Court Justice who had no prior judicial experience.[1]

Shiras was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania January 26, 1832. He graduated from Yale College, Phi Beta Kappa, in 1853.[2] He began law school at Yale, but left before earning a law degree[1] He finished his training at a law office, then practiced law in Dubuque, Iowa from 1855 to 1858, and in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from 1858 to 1892.[3]

Although Shiras sat on the Court for more than 10 years authoring 253 majority decisions and 14 dissents, he is noted for his votes on just two landmark cases, Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895), and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).[1] He sided with the majority in the 5-4 decision in Pollock to strike down the Income Tax Act of 1894 as unconstitutional. Some historians believe Shiras was the pivotal Justice who switched his vote, while other historians suspect that it was either Justice Horace Gray or Justice David Brewer.[1] Regardless, the ruling in Pollock led to the need for a constitutional amendment to impose a federal income tax, and in 1913, Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. Shiras also voted with the 7-1 majority Plessy, a case which upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the doctrine of separate but equal, and which was not overruled until 1954.

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d George Shiras, HistoryCentral.com, accessed Oct 10, 2009
  2. ^ Supreme Court Justices Who Are Phi Beta Kappa Members, Phi Beta Kappa website, accessed Oct 4, 2009
  3. ^ George Shiras, Biographical Directory of Federal Judges, accessed Oct 10 2009

References

External links

Legal offices
Preceded by
Joseph Philo Bradley
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
October 10, 1892 – February 23, 1903
Succeeded by
William R. Day

 
 

 

Copyrights:

US Supreme Court. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Copyright © 1992, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
US Government Guide. The Oxford Guide to the United States Government. Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1998, 2001, 2002 by John J. Patrick, Richard M. Pious, Donald M. Ritchie. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "George Shiras, Jr." Read more