Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'keefe

 
US Supreme Court: Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'keefe

306 U.S. 466 (1939), argued 6 Mar. 1939, decided 27 Mar. 1939 by vote of 7 to 2; Stone for the Court, Hughes and Frankfurter concurring, Butler and McReynolds in dissent. Until this case, there had been an explicit immunity of state employees from federal taxation and federal employees from state taxes, going back to the 1871 decision in Collector v. Day. This immunity had been reinforced in the famous Income Tax Cases (Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 1895), in which the Court had held that a tax on income was a tax on the source of that income.

New York imposed an income tax on a New York resident employed by the Federal Home Owners Loan Corporation, who paid the tax and then appealed on the basis of intergovernmental tax immunity. The Court held that nothing in the Constitution required such an immunity, nor did any act of Congress specifically grant immunity to federal employees. The Court thus concluded that salaries of federal employees were subject to regular state taxes.

Justice Harlan Fiske Stone's opinion specifically overruled Collector v. Day and other cases supporting immunity as well as the doctrine that a tax on income constitutes a tax on the source of that income.

Later in the year Congress enacted the Public Salary Tax Act, specifically extending federal income taxes to state employees and also consenting to state taxes on the incomes of federal employees, although under the ruling in this case such consent was no longer necessary.

See also Tax Immunities.

— Melvin I. Urofsky

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

US Supreme Court. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Copyright © 1992, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more