Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Home Mortgage Disclosure Act

 
Financial & Investment Dictionary: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA)

Act passed by Congress in 1975 and implemented by the Federal Reserve Board'S Regulation C, requiring lending institutions to report data that is used to determine if financial institutions are serving the housing needs of their communities, if discriminatory lending policies are in effect, and if public sector or private sector investments are needed in particular areas. See also Community Reinvestment Act Of 1977.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
Top

The United States Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (or HMDA, pronounced HUM-duh) was passed in 1975. It requires financial institutions to maintain and annually disclose data about home purchases, home purchase pre-approvals, home improvement, and refinance applications involving 1 to 4 unit and multifamily dwellings. It also requires branches and loan centers to display a HMDA poster.[1]

HMDA was designed by the Federal Reserve Board in order to:

  • Help public officials to distribute public-sector investments
  • Discover if financial institutions are serving housing needs of communities
  • Identify where there are discriminatory lending practices

Contents

Details of the Law

A US company is covered by HMDA if

  • It has at least $37 million in assets (as of 2008; the limit varies each year)[2]
  • It has made at least one home mortgage loan in the preceding year
  • The company itself is Federally insured or regulated or at least one of the loans it made were intended to be sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac

Approximately 8,600 companies are covered by HMDA.[3]

Companies covered under HMDA are required to keep a Loan Application Register (LAR). Each time someone applies for a home mortgage at an institution covered by HMDA, the company is required to make a corresponding entry into the LAR, noting the following information.

  • The loan amount
  • The purpose of the loan (home purchase, home improvement, refinancing)
  • The type of property involved (single-family, multifamily)
  • The loan type (conventional loan, FHA loan, VA loan or a loan guaranteed by the Farmers Home Administration)
  • The location (state, county, MSA and census tract) of the property
  • The race of the borrower(s)
  • The ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic) of the borrower(s)
  • The gender of the borrower(s)
  • Whether or not the loan was granted
  • If the loan was denied, the reason why it was denied
  • If the loan was denied, whether the interest rate charged was over a certain threshold
  • If the loan was subsequently sold in the secondary market, the type of entity that purchased it

Every March reporting institutions are required to submit their LARs to the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), an interagency body empowered to administer HMDA. Nowadays reporting takes place electronically. FFIEC screens the data for errors and the releases it to the public electronically (on CD-ROM and over the internet). Reporting institutions are also required to disclose their individual LARs to members of the public upon request.

Ways to Use HMDA to Pinpoint Discrimination

HMDA data can be used to identify probable housing discrimination in various ways:

  • If an institution turns down a disproportionate percentage of applications by certain races (e.g. African Americans), ethnicities (e.g. Hispanics) or genders (typically women) then there is reason to suspect that the institution may be discriminating against these classes of borrowers by unfairly denying them credit. Such discrimination is illegal in the United States.
  • If an institution has a disproportionately low percentage of applications by certain races (e.g. African Americans), ethnicities (e.g. Hispanics) or genders (typically women) then there is reason to suspect that the institution may be discriminating against these classes of borrowers by unfairly discouraging them from applying for mortgage loans. Such discrimination is illegal in the United States.
  • If an institution has a disproportionately low percentage of applications from certain areas, compared to areas immediately surrounding the area in question, then there is reason to suspect that the institution is engaging in redlining.
  • If there is a disproportionate prevalence of high-interest loans to certain classes of borrowers (e.g., Hispanics or women) then there is a reason to suspect that the institution is engaging in discrimination.

References


External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Financial & Investment Dictionary. Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms. Copyright © 2006 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Home Mortgage Disclosure Act" Read more