Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Illicit major

 
Philosophy Dictionary: illicit major

Fallacy committed when a syllogism has a major term distributed in the conclusion but not in the premise. ‘Some mortals are herbivores; no lions are mortal; therefore no lions are herbivores.’

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Illicit major
Top

Illicit major is a logical fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its major term is undistributed in the major premise but distributed in the conclusion.

This fallacy has the following argument form:

   All A are B.
   No C are A.
   Therefore, no C are B. 

Example:

  • All dogs are mammals.
  • No cats are dogs.
  • Therefore, no cats are mammals.

In this argument, the major term is "mammals". This is distributed in the conclusion (the last statement) because we are making a claim about a property of all mammals: that they are not cats. However, it is not distributed in the major premise (the first statement) where we are only talking about a property of some mammals: Only some mammals are dogs.

The error is in assuming that the converse of the first statement (that all mammals are dogs) is also true.

See also

External links

This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Philosophy, which is licensed under the GFDL.




 
 

 

Copyrights:

Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Illicit major" Read more