Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Illicit minor

 
Philosophy Dictionary: illicit minor

Fallacy committed in a syllogism when the minor term is distributed in the conclusion but not in the premise in which it occurs. ‘Some lions are friendly; no friendly things roar; therefore no lions roar.’

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Illicit minor
Top

Illicit minor is a logical fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its minor term is undistributed in the minor premise but distributed in the conclusion.

This fallacy has the following argument form:

All A are B.
All A are C.
Therefore, all C are B.

Example:

All cats are felines.
All cats are mammals.
Therefore, all mammals are felines.

The minor term here is mammal, which is not distributed in the minor premise "All cats are mammals," because this premise is only defining a property of possibly some mammals (i.e., that they're cats.) However, in the conclusion "All mammals are felines," mammal is distributed (it is talking about all mammals being felines). It is shown to be false by any mammal that is not a feline; for example, a dog.

See also

This article was originally based on material from the Free On-line Dictionary of Philosophy, which is licensed under the GFDL.




 
 

 

Copyrights:

Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Illicit minor" Read more