The implied author is the virtual author of fiction and film assumed as the subject that lets the persons in the story to talk and act. It is distinct from the real author and the narrator in the story.
This concept comes onstage in the interpretation dispute or Hermeneutics of text. Succeeding the old tradition since Goethe, Thomas Carlyle and Benedetto Croce, obstinate Intentionalists P. D. Juhl and E. D. Hirsch Jr. insist yet that the interpretation is right that reflects the intention of the real author exactly.
However, under the influence of structuralism, Roland Barthes declared "the death of the (real) author" and he said the text talks itself in reading. Anti-intentionalist like Monroe Beardsley and Roger Fowler also thought that interpretation should be brought out only from the text. We should not confuse the meaning of the text with the intention of the author. A text has its own meaning by itself without the author. We can actually understand the meaning of the text even if the author is unknown.
Wayne C. Booth brought the new term "implied author" to distinguish the following virtual author of the text from the real author. 1. The virtual author made by the real author to write a text without his private bias. 2. A particular side of the author in the particular work. 3. The fictional narrator made by the real author. 4. The whole group that made or affected the work. 5. The subject or theme used as the norm to choice the various things in the work. In addition, he proposed another concept "career-author", the unity of the whole works of the real author to apply for the norm to interpret a work instead of the then intention of the real author.
Gérard Genette tried to treat this problem with his new term "Focalization". He distinguished 3 cases. 1. Zero Focalisation: the implied author knows all and he can describe even the mental states of the all persons. 2. Internal Focalisation: the implied author is one of the persons in the story and he talks always as monologue with his impresions. 3. External Focalization: the implied author talks objectively only the external behavior of the persons in the story . Mieke Bal pointed out however that this examination is not for the implied author but only for the narrator in the story. The implied author is the subject that lets the narrator in the story to talk. He talks nothing by himself.
Seymour Chatman pays attention to the productivity of the meaning that a work has more than the intention of the real author. This productivity is given by the real reader of the later period and it is not the dead real author but the implied author living in the work that the real reader converses with. Hans-Georg Gadamer also considered the creativity of the text as conversation with the reader.
However, with the attention to the creativity of the work independent of the real author, post-modernism was thereafter in fashion. They do not postulate the presence of the implied author that gives to the work the unity. They regard a work as miscellany of the various traditional contexts or only "the bundle of the contexts". They think there is no whole unity of the work essentially and that we can derive anything from the work with our own interest. Therefore, they prefer to treat works as the material for "Cultural studies", for example research of ideology, nationality, ethnicity, social class and gender.
By the way, the implied author problem was more serious in film studies. André Bazin, Alexandre Astruc and François Truffaut advocated Author policy or the "caméra-stylo (camera-pen)" theory that the director is the only author of the film. They hated the making way of Hollywood on initiative of film studio and applauded independent films in U.S known as New Hollywood.
However, such gloomy films and experimental films could never catch the heart of the public of TV age in practice. The next generation Steven Spielberg and George Lucas steered for entertainment films of big budget and the film studios in Hollywood retrieved the initiative with the power of money. The studio uses plural writers and changes even the director till the film measures up to the expectation.
Seymour Chatman said that there is no real author of the film more and that the implied author of the film is therefore postulated here to analyze the story. The wave of post-modernism however swelled also here and they did not ask any author more. Teruaki Georges Sumioka researched the practical film making process as the act by Body corporate of film studio and regarded film as the same sort of compilation like a dictionary commented in 17 U.S.C. § 101 of United States copyright law. He says the real author of film is not the director but the studio all along, while he postulates proper implied author of each film as the collective subject of the T Grand Structure conversing with the audience.
References
- P. D. Juhl, Interpretation: An Essay in the Philosophy of Literary Criticism, 1981 (ISBN 0691020337)
- E. D. Hirsch Jr., Validity in Interpretation, 1967 (ISBN 0300016921)
- Roland Barthes, La mort de l'auteur, in French 1968, in Image-Music-Text, translated in English 1977 (ISBN 0374521360)
- Monroe Beardsley, Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, 1958, 2nd ed. 1981 (ISBN 091514509X)
- Roger Fowler, Linguistic Criticism, 1986, 2nd ed. 1996 (ISBN 0192892614)
- Wayne C. Booth, The Rhetoric of Fiction, 1961 (ISBN 0226065588)
- Gérard Genette, Figures III, 1972, Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, translated in English 1983 (ISBN 0801492599)
- Mieke Bal, De theorie van vertellen en verhalen, in Dutch 1980, Narratology: introduction to the theory of narrative, translated in English 1985, 1997 (ISBN 0802078060)
- Seymour Chatman, Coming to Terms: The Rhetric of Narrative in Fiction and Film, 1990 (ISBN 0801497361)
- Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, in German 1960, Truth and Method, translated in English 1989, 2nd ed. 2005 (ISBN 082647697X)
- Teruaki Georges Sumioka, The Grammar of Entertainment Film, in Japanese 2005 (ISBN 4845905744)