inalienable possession
Inalienable possession (opposed to alienable possession) in linguistics is a relationship between two objects indicating that they are (possibly on a less-than-physical level) connected in some way that cannot be changed. Some languages, such as Dholuo, mark this distinction with different forms. The first Dholuo example is a case of alienable possession, as the bone is not part of the dog.
- cogo guok
- bone dog
- 'the dog's bone' (which it is eating)
The following is however an example of inalienable possession, the bone being part of the cow:
- cok dhiang'
- bone (construct state) cow
- 'a cow bone'[1]
What counts as inalineable possession varies from one language to another. It may be used for family relationships, body parts, and authorship, among other things. It is therefore often impossible to say that a particular relationship is an example of inalienable possession without specifying the languages for which that holds true.
Both inalienable possession and alienable possession fall under a broader possessive category in most languages, including English, Latin, and Arabic, where this distinction is not marked, and therefore not referred to. Marking the distinction is much rarer than ignoring it.
Bernd Heine argues that the categories of inalienability are so variable because of processes of linguistic change: "rather than being a semantically defined category, inalienability is more likely to constitute a morpho-syntactic or morphophonological entity, one that owes its existence to the fact that certain nouns happened to be left out when a new pattern for marking attributive possession arose."[2].
References
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
