(Participation in) government of a workplace by those who work there. Also known by its French name, autogestion. The idea of industrial democracy arose along with socialism, but the two are not always intimate. A typical socialist commitment, from Clause IV of the constitution of the British Labour Party, as it was worded from 1918 until 1995, is to ‘the common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service’. But when, say, coal-mining is nationalized, do the mines then belong to the miners or to the people? The interests of the miners and the people as a whole are not identical: the former benefit from dear coal and the latter from cheap coal.
Socialist theorists have debated this many times: for instance in controversy between Marx and Bakunin in the 1870s, and especially between c.1900 and 1920, with the rise of revolutionary syndicalism and of guild socialism. Syndicalists believed that the workers in each industry should seize it, but had no theory of equitable or efficient distribution or exchange. Guild socialism supported non-revolutionary industrial democracy, but again without addressing issues of distribution or exchange. Therefore there was no sustained intellectual challenge to the standard pattern of nationalization, in which a railwayman might be appointed to the Coal Board and a miner to the Railways Board, but never a miner to the Coal Board.
The rise of market socialism in the 1980s revived interest in industrial democracy, and concentrated attention on the relatively few successful experiments in it. The most notable of these is the network of producer cooperative enterprises at Mondragon, in the Spanish Basque country. Elsewhere, worker-controlled enterprises suffer chronically from shortages of capital and from conflict of interest between existing members and new entrants. These conflicts are least serious where a firm depends more on human capital (brain-power and skills) than on machinery, and so industrial democracy is commonest in service enterprises, notably in computing and information technology.
Not all advocates of industrial democracy are socialists: for instance Robert A. Dahl is a liberal who argues that people should have as much power to decide in the workplace as in the political marketplace.




