 |
This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from other articles related to it. (July 2009) |
J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd and Others v Graham and another [2002] UKHL 30 is a House of Lords judgment on adverse possession.
Contents |
Facts
Pye was the owner of the land and Graham was a squatter. The land had development potential but Pye allowed Graham to use it for grazing under an agreement which was described as a licence. The document expressly stated that the agreement would end on a certain date and that to continue the arrangement a new contract would need to be entered into. Pye did not enter into an another agreement because he wanted to develop the land but Graham continued to occupy the land.[1]
European Convention
The case was litigated as J. A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and Another v United Kingdom in the European Convention on Human Rights.[2]
References
- ^ http://www.propertylawuk.net/adversepossessionpyegraham.html
- ^ http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article2393084.ece
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
