US Supreme Court:

Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. Resweber

329 U.S. 459 (1947), argued 18 Nov. 1946, decided 13 Jan. 1947 by vote of 5 to 4; Reed for the Court, Burton in dissent. In November 1944, Andrew Thomas, a white St. Martinsville, Louisiana, druggist, was murdered, apparently by fifteen‐year‐old Willie Francis, who was black. With little help from his court‐appointed attorneys, Francis was quickly convicted and condemned to execution in the electric chair. But when Francis sat in it on 3 May 1946, it malfunctioned; the two‐minute jolt of electricity failed to kill (or even disable) him. Reached by phone, the governor scheduled a new execution date for the next week.

But attorneys responding to the pleas of the inmate's father took the case to the Supreme Court. They argued that the attempt to execute Francis again would constitute double jeopardy, and, more importantly, cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The justices refused to block a second execution attempt. The swing vote was cast in a concurring opinion by Justice Felix Frankfurter, usually a death penalty foe.

Petitions for rehearing and clemency were unsuccessful, and one year and six days after the original blunder, Willie Francis again sat in the electric chair. This time it worked.

See also Capital Punishment; Race Discrimination and the Death Penalty.

— Michael L. Radelet

 
 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. Resweber" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

US Supreme Court. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Copyright © 1992, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In:

Related Topics