Marketing Accountability Standards Board

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Wikipedia on Answers.com:

Marketing Accountability Standards Board

Top
Marketing Accountability Standards Board
Founded 2007
Motto . . . where marketing and finance align on measurement for reporting, forecasting and improving financial returns from buyers in markets . . . short-term and over time.
Website www.themasb.org

The Marketing Accountability Foundation[1] and its Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB) is an independent, private sector, self-governing group of academics and practitioners whose purpose is to establish marketing measurement and accountability standards. The standards are intended for continuous improvement in financial performance, and for the guidance and education of users of performance and financial information.[2]

Contents

History

Establishment of the Board was recommended by The Boardroom Project (2004–2007)[3] in response to growing demand for marketing accountability. A group of practitioners and academics saw an opportunity to increase the contribution of the marketing function, through the development of standard metrics and processes that link marketing activities more objectively and more closely to the financial performance of the firm.[4]

Over a three-year period, The Boardroom Project conducted a review of current practices, needs and initiatives, and found:

  1. Marketing has been relegated to the “default” category (control costs) because it lacks metrics that reliably tie activities and costs to financial return
  2. While issues surrounding metrics and accountability were not being ignored, practices and initiatives were too narrow in focus, lacking integration and generally not tied to financial return in predictable ways
  3. Measurement standards are essential for the efficient and effective functioning of a marketing-driven business because decisions about allocation of resources and assessment of results rely on credible, valid, transparent and understandable information
  4. Standards across industries and domains as well as a transparent process by which to develop and select the metrics will be necessary to improve the current situation
  5. As was true for manufacturing and product quality with ISO & ANSI and for accounting & financial reporting with FASB & IASB, there is need for an industry-level authority to establish standards and ensure continuing relevancy.[5]
  6. The development of generally accepted common standards for measurement and measurement processes will enhance the credibility of the marketing discipline, improve the effectiveness and efficiency of marketing activities, guide continuous improvement, and enable Marketing to move from discretionary business expense to board-level strategic investment

Mission

The Mission of MASB is to “Establish marketing measurement and accountability standards across industry and domain for continuous improvement in financial performance and for the guidance and education of business decision makers and users of performance and financial information.”[2]

Role

MASB sets the standards and processes for evaluating marketing measurement that ensures credibility, validity, transparency and understanding. The Board does not endorse specific measures. Rather, it documents how measures stack up against the Marketing Metric Audit Protocol (MMAP). The intention is that the market will select specific measures based on these evaluations. The Board's Dynamic Marketing Metrics Catalogue is intended to be the primary vehicle for documentation and publication.

The Board also intends to demonstrate how to use ideal measures according to MMAP for specific marketing activities, such as TV or on-line advertising or other specialized activities and areas. The Board also investigates practices underlying the development and management of ideal measures as well as practices utilized to create knowledge, determine causality, and apply the findings to process management for improved return. .”[2]

Precepts of conduct

MASB Directors operate according to the following precepts of conduct:

  • Be open and objective in decision making
  • Weigh carefully the needs and views of constituency
  • Promulgate standards when the logic and empiric support is convincing, the scientific evidence pros and cons are acknowledged, and the conclusions are meaningful, with expected benefits exceeding costs
  • Ensure transparency of the standards setting activity through open due process
  • Bring about needed change while minimizing disruption
  • Review effects of past decisions (interpret, amend, replace) [6]

Projects

The work of the MASB is conducted on a project basis, including the overall categories of standards, research, and concepts. Selection of priorities is based on pervasiveness of the issue, alternative solutions, technical feasibility, and resources, as well as practical consequences, convergence possibilities, and cooperative opportunities. Projects on the agenda were recommended by its charter members, with feedback from C-Level interviews.[7] [8] (See these links for an up-to-date list of projects: completed, underway, and ready for industry feedback.)

Marketing Metric Audit Protocol (MMAP)

Marketing Metric Audit Protocol (MMAP)

The Marketing Metric Audit Protocol (MMAP) is a formal process for connecting marketing activities to the financial performance of the firm.[5]

The process includes the conceptual linking of marketing activities to intermediate marketing outcome metrics to cash flow drivers of the business, as well as the validation and causality characteristics of an ideal metric. Cash flow both short-term and over time is the ultimate metric to which all activities of a business enterprise, including marketing, should be causally linked through the validation of intermediate marketing measures; therefore the process of validating the intermediate outcome measures against short-term and long-term cash flow drivers is necessary to forecast and improve the return.[9]

MMAP Metric Profiles

MMAP Metric Profiles is a catalogue of marketing metrics documenting the psychometric properties of the measures and giving specific information about reliability, validity, range of use, sensitivity, particularly in terms of validity and sensitivity with respect to financial criteria. This is intended to remedy a situation where most commercial providers offer little detail about their measures, with most publicly available information focusing on integrated suites of products and services with little technical information.

The Metrics Catalogue is provided on the MASB website as metric providers undergo the audit and their offerings are profiled according to MMAP.[9]

Marketing Accountability Foundation

The Marketing Accountability Foundation (MAF)[1] is the independent, private sector, self-governing organization that oversees the activities of the Board. It provides oversight, administration and funding for its standards-setting Board (MASB) and its Advisory Council (MAC) and selects the MASB Directors and MAC Advisors. It is authorized by its constituency to establish and improve marketing measurement and accountability standards, educate constituents about those standards, and protect the independence and integrity of the standards-setting process. The Foundation is incorporated exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Sources of funding include membership dues, projects, workshops, technical services, publications, and training, advisory and auditing services.

Membership

Membership is organization-based, and open to marketers, business schools, measurement (modeling and software) providers, media providers, media and advertising agencies, industry associations, and independent consultants. Founding members in order of joining are University of California Riverside, The MMAP Center, Starcom MediaVest Group, The Nielsen Company, The Advertising Research Foundation (ARF), Marketing Science Institute (MSI), UCLA Anderson School of Management, and Columbia University. Charter Members include ConAgra Foods, University of Michigan, American Marketing Association (AMA), Association of National Advertisers (ANA), Kimberly-Clark, Foresight ROI, Blue Marble Enterprises, Mobile Marketing Association (MMA), The Wharton School, NYU Stern School of Business, CoreBrand, The Coca-Cola Company, Darden School of Business, University of Cologne, comScore, AAAA, McCombs School of Business, iab, gptv, and J. Mack Robinson College of Business. [5][10][11]

References

  1. ^ a b MASB. Marketing Accountability Foundation (MAF). [cited 8 December 2010]
  2. ^ a b c MASB Mission. [cited 8 December 2010]
  3. ^ The Boardroom Project.[cited 8 December 2010]
  4. ^ Gregory, James. "In Search of Brand Accountability." Branding Strategy Insider. 9 July 2010. [cited 19 January 2011]
  5. ^ a b c Neff, Jack. "Mass of Metrics May Mean Marketers Know Less." Advertising Age. 20 September 2010. [cited 19 January 2011]
  6. ^ MASB. Precepts of Conduct. [cited 8 December 2010]
  7. ^ [1]
  8. ^ MASB. MASB Projects. [cited 8 December 2010]
  9. ^ a b MASB. MMAP. [cited 8 December 2010]
  10. ^ click here.
  11. ^ Charter Membership. [cited 8 December 2010]

External links


Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights: