Metaphone

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Lawrence Philips redirects here. For the football player, see Lawrence Phillips.

Metaphone is a phonetic algorithm, an algorithm published in 1990 for indexing words by their English pronunciation[1]. It fundamentally improves on the Soundex algorithm by using information about variations and inconsistencies in English spelling and pronunciation to produce a more accurate encoding, which does a better job of matching words and names which sound similar. As with Soundex, similar sounding words should share the same keys. Metaphone is available as a built-in operator in a number of systems, including later versions of PHP.

The original author later produced a new version of the algorithm, which he named Double Metaphone. Contrary to the original algorithm whose application is limited to English only, this version takes into account spelling peculiarities of a number of other languages. In 2009 Lawrence Philips released a third version, called Metaphone 3, which achieves an accuracy of approximately 99% for English words, non-English words familiar to Americans, and first names and family names commonly found in the United States, having been developed according to modern engineering standards against a test harness of prepared correct encodings.

Contents

Procedure

Metaphone codes use the 16 consonant symbols 0BFHJKLMNPRSTWXY.[2] The '0' represents "th" (as an ASCII approximation of Θ), 'X' represents "sh" or "ch", and the others represent their usual English pronunciations. The vowels AEIOU are also used, but only at the beginning of the code.[3]

  1. Drop duplicate adjacent letters, except for C.
  2. If the word begins with 'KN', 'GN', 'PN', 'AE', 'WR', drop the first letter.
  3. Drop 'B' if after 'M' at the end of the word.
  4. 'C' transforms to 'X' if followed by 'IA' or 'H' (unless in latter case, it is part of '-SCH-', in which case it transforms to 'K'). 'C' transforms to 'S' if followed by 'I', 'E', or 'Y'. Otherwise, 'C' transforms to 'K'.
  5. 'D' transforms to 'J' if followed by 'GE', 'GY', or 'GI'. Otherwise, 'D' transforms to 'T'.
  6. Drop 'G' if followed by 'H' and 'H' is not at the end or before a vowel. Drop 'G' if followed by 'N' or 'NED' and is at the end.
  7. 'G' transforms to 'J' if before 'I', 'E', or 'Y', and it is not in 'GG'. Otherwise, 'G' transforms to 'K'.
  8. Drop 'H' if after vowel and not before a vowel.
  9. 'CK' transforms to 'K'.
  10. 'PH' transforms to 'F'.
  11. 'Q' transforms to 'K'.
  12. 'S' transforms to 'X' if followed by 'H', 'IO', or 'IA'.
  13. 'T' transforms to 'X' if followed by 'IA' or 'IO'. 'TH' transforms to '0'. Drop 'T' if followed by 'CH'.
  14. 'V' transforms to 'F'.
  15. 'WH' transforms to 'W' if at the beginning. Drop 'W' if not followed by a vowel.
  16. 'X' transforms to 'S' if at the beginning. Otherwise, 'X' transforms to 'KS'.
  17. Drop 'Y' if not followed by a vowel.
  18. 'Z' transforms to 'S'.
  19. Drop all vowels unless it is the beginning.

Double Metaphone

The Double Metaphone phonetic encoding algorithm is the second generation of this algorithm. Its implementation was described in the June 2000 issue of C/C++ Users Journal.

It is called "Double" because it can return both a primary and a secondary code for a string; this accounts for some ambiguous cases as well as for multiple variants of surnames with common ancestry. For example, encoding the name "Smith" yields a primary code of SM0 and a secondary code of XMT, while the name "Schmidt" yields a primary code of XMT and a secondary code of SMT--both have XMT in common.

Double Metaphone tries to account for myriad irregularities in English of Slavic, Germanic, Celtic, Greek, French, Italian, Spanish, Chinese, and other origin. Thus it uses a much more complex ruleset for coding than its predecessor; for example, it tests for approximately 100 different contexts of the use of the letter C alone.

Metaphone 3

A professional version was released in October 2009, developed by the same author, Lawrence Philips. Metaphone 3 further improves phonetic encoding of words in the English language, non-English words familiar to Americans, and first names and family names commonly found in the United States.[4] It improves encoding for for proper names in particular to a considerable extent.[5] The author claims that in general it improves accuracy for all words from the approximately 89% of Double Metaphone to over 99%. Developers can also now set switches in to code to cause the algorithm to encode Metaphone keys 1) taking non-initial vowels into account, as well as 2) encoding voiced and unvoiced consonants differently. This allows the result set to be more closely focused if the developer finds that the search results include too many words that don't resemble the search term closely enough.[6] Metaphone 3 is sold as source code in C++, Java and C#.[7]

See also

External links

Metaphone Implementations

Double Metaphone Implementations

References

  1. ^ Hanging on the Metaphone, Lawrence Philips. Computer Language, Vol. 7, No. 12 (December), 1990.
  2. ^ http://www.sound-ex.com/alternative_zu_soundex
  3. ^ http://www.morfoedro.it/doc.php?n=222&lang=en
  4. ^ B P Pande and Prof. H S Dhami. Article: Application of Natural Language Processing Tools in Stemming. International Journal of Computer Applications 27(6):14-19, August 2011. Published by Foundation of Computer Science, New York, USA.
  5. ^ Best Faces Forward: A Large-scale Study of People Search in the Enterprise I Guy, S Ur, I Ronen, S Weber… - 2012 - http://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/imt/papers/guyCHI12.pdf
  6. ^ http://aspell.net/metaphone/
  7. ^ http://www.amorphics.com/

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

Copyrights: