Cover of the 2001 Metropolitan Books edition
Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America is a book authored by Barbara Ehrenreich. Written from the perspective of the undercover journalist, it sets out to investigate the impact of the 1996 welfare reform on the "working
poor" in the United States. In some ways it is similar to George Orwell's much earlier Down and Out in Paris
and London as well as German investigative reporter Günter Wallraff's Ganz
Unten (The Lowest of the Low).
The events related in the book took place between spring 1998 and summer 2000. The book was first published in 2001 by
Metropolitan Books. An earlier version appeared as an article in the January 1999 issue of
Harper's magazine. Ehrenreich later wrote a companion book, Bait and
Switch (published September 2005), which discusses her attempt to find a white-collar job.
A stage adaptation by Joan Holden opened in 2002.
Storyline
During a conversation with Lewis Lapham, editor of Harper's, Ehrenreich proposes a journalistic approach to the
effects of welfare reform, an infiltration of the "unskilled" work market; unbeknownst to her, she would be the one
investigating. Securing funds all for unexpected expenses, approximately $1300, she leaves her home and her middle-class
existence, with a few personal items and her car, for a few months of low wage work.
Starting off in her backyard, Ehrenreich searches for lodging and a job in neighboring Key
West, Florida. Securing jobs at two restaurants, "Jerry's" and "Hearthside", fictitiously named, in consonance with other
locations and people throughout the book, and a one-day housekeeping stint, she works for one month before succumbing to an
extremely busy night at Jerry's; after walking out mid-shift, Ehrenreich heads to Portland,
Maine, without an automobile, for a fresh start.
Beginning anew, Ehrenreich lands two more jobs after a four day search, one as an assistant at a nursing home and another as a
maid at a cleaning franchise. Worn down by her work-load and work-related stress, she
travels to her final destination, Minneapolis, Minnesota, where she is employed
in the women's department at a Wal-Mart before ultimately ending her investigation. Even with
the odds stacked on her side -- a car, no dependents (other than herself), and initial funds --
Ehrenreich fails to achieve a sustainable lifestyle.
Social issues
Written as an exposé, Ehrenreich attempts to combat the "too lazy to work" and "a job will defeat poverty" ideals held by
traditionalists. Suggesting problems with the argument, Ehrenreich highlights many of the difficulties people have working jobs
that pay low wages.
Foremost, she attacks the notion that low-wage jobs require "unskilled" labor. The author, a Ph.D. educated journalist, found
manual labor taxing, uninteresting and degrading. She described how the work required incredible feats of stamina, focus, memory,
quick thinking, and fast learning. Constant and repeated movement creates a risk of repetitive stress injury, pain must often be worked through to hold a job in a market with
constant turnover; and the days are filled with degrading and uninteresting tasks (e.g. toilet-cleaning and
shirt-reordering).
She argues "personality" tests, questionnaires designed to weed out "incompatible"
potential employees, and urine drug tests, increasingly common in the low wage market, deter potential applicants and violate
liberties while managerial apathy and austereness contribute to class separation and promote an unhealthy, stressful work
environment.
She reports that "help needed" signs don't necessarily indicate an opening; more often their purpose is to sustain a pool of
applicants to safeguard against rapid turnover of employees. She also argues one low wage job is often not enough to support one
person (let alone a family); with inflating housing prices and stagnant wages, this practice increasingly becomes difficult to
maintain. Many of the workers encountered in the book survive by living with relatives or other persons in the same position, or
in their cars in parking lots.
She concludes by refuting the claim that low-wage workers, recipients of government or charitable services like welfare, food,
and healthcare, are simply living off the generosity of others. Instead, she suggests, "we" live off their generosity:
- When someone works for less pay than she can live on ... she has made a great sacrifice for you ... The "working poor" ...
are in fact the major philanthropists of our society. They neglect their own children so that the children of others will be
cared for; they live in substandard housing so that other homes will be shiny and perfect; they endure privation so that
inflation will be low and stock prices high. To be a member of the working poor is to be an anonymous donor, a nameless
benefactor, to everyone else. (p. 221)
See also
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
