| This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2009) |
A no-contest clause, also called an in terrorem clause, is a clause in a legal document, such as a contract or a will, that is designed to threaten someone, usually with litigation or criminal prosecution, into acting, refraining from action, or ceasing to act. The phrase is typically used to refer to a clause in a will that threatens to disinherit a beneficiary of the will if that beneficiary challenges the terms of the will in court. Many states[1] allow for a Will to have a no contest clause, so long as the person challenging the will doesn't have probable cause to do challenge so.[2]
Contents |
No-contest clause in wills
The Uniform Probate Code (UPC) §§ 2-517 and 3‑905 allow for no contest clauses so long as the person challenging the will doesn't have probable cause to do so.[2] The full wording is:
A provision in a will purporting to penalize an interested person for contesting the will or instituting other proceedings relating to the estate is unenforceable if probable cause exists for instituting proceedings.
—UPC §§ 2-517 and 3‑905 [2]
The UPC has been adopted in several smaller states, including Alaska, Montana, and New Mexico, but also by Florida, one of the larger states in population.[1]
Some states allow for "living probate" and "ante mortem" probate, which are statutory provisions which authorize testators to institute an adversary proceeding during their life to declare the validity of the will, in order to avoid later will contests.[citation needed]
No-contest clauses by state
California
In California, no-contest clauses are completely effective, and will divest any party that unsuccessfully contests a will containing such a clause.[citation needed]
New York
New York has rejected the "probable cause" defense to enforcement of such clauses. Such clauses are given full effect upon challenge. Some exceptions apply, e.g. election against the will by a minor, contest on ground of forgery or revocation by later Will.[3]
N.Y. EPTL specifically states:
A condition, designed to prevent a disposition from taking effect in case the will is contested by the beneficiary, is operative despite the presence or absence of probable cause for such contest, subject to [exceptions]
—N.Y. EPTL § 3-3.5 [3]
Virginia
Virginia has generally rejected the "probable cause" defense.[citation needed]
References
- ^ a b Cornell Law School website page on Uniform Probate Code. Accessed October 5, 2009.
- ^ a b c Uniform Probate Code (UPC) § 2-517. Penalty Clause for Contest, replicated at § 3‑905. Penalty Clause for Contest. Both found at Univeristy of Pennsylvania Law School website page on Uniform Probate Code. Accessed October 5, 2009.
- ^ a b N.Y. EPTL § 3-3.5 Conditions qualifying dispositions; conditions against contest; limitations thereon, found at New York state Assembly website, go to EPT Estates, Powers & Trusts. Accessed October 5, 2009.
| This article relating to law in the United States, or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)




