Results for Parson's Cause
On this page:
 

Dispute involving English clergy in colonial Virginia over payment of salaries. When the British vetoed colonial laws that substituted currency for tobacco as payment for clerical salaries (1759), the clergy sued for back pay. In the most publicized case (1763), Patrick Henry defended a colonial parish against a suit by a clergyman, citing interference by the British and convincing a jury to return only one penny in damages. The clergy soon gave up their protest.

For more information on Parson's Cause, visit Britannica.com.

 
 
US History Encyclopedia: Parson's Cause

Parson'S Cause, refers to conflict over ministers' salaries in the 1750s and 1760s. Ministers' salaries had been fixed (1748) at 17,200 pounds of tobacco a year, and laws in 1755 and 1758 sought to limit price fluctuations by allowing payment in paper money at two pence per pound. Because tobacco sold for sixpence a pound, ministers assailed the law, obtaining a royal veto in 1759. In court battles in the 1760s, Patrick Henry defended Virginia against claims for back wages, assailing vetoes of laws for the public good and securing a jury award of one penny damages. After a series of further setbacks, the ministers ceased their agitation after 1767.

Bibliography

Christie, I. R. Crisis of Empire. New York: Norton, 1966.

 
Wikipedia: Parson's Cause

The Parson's Cause was an important legal and political dispute in the Colony of Virginia often viewed as an important event leading up to the American Revolution. The case arose with regard to the Virginia Two-Penny Act. This act was a reaction to the poor tobacco crop of 1758. The shortage caused the price of a pound of tobacco to rise from two pennies a pound to six. Virginia had passed legislation in 1748 pegging salaries for Anglican clergy in the Colony of Virginia at 16,000 pounds of tobacco a year. The Virginia legislature responded to the tobacco price increase by allowing debts in tobacco to be paid to in currency equivalent to two pennies a pound, which was a third of the market price. King George III of England vetoed the law causing an uproar. The Virginia legislature saw the veto as a breach of its authority.

Reverend James Maury, a clergyman, responded to the veto by suing for back wages as requested of all the ministers involved; in effect, he became a representative of the British cause. Patrick Henry first emerged as notable figure by defending Hanover County, Virginia against the policies of Reverend James Maury. Henry argued for the Two-Penny Act, saying, "that a King, by disallowing Acts of this salutary nature, from being the father of his people, degenerated into a Tyrant and forfeits all right to his subjects' obedience."

The court found in favor of Rev. James Maury (grandfather of Matthew Fontaine Maury), but awarded him only one penny in damages. The case effectively nullified the veto and no other clergy sued. Interestingly, Patrick Henry's daughter, Martha, married Reverend John Fontaine, who was part of Reverend James Maury's family, and there are descendants today from both of these men.

References


 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Parson's Cause" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
US History Encyclopedia. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Parson's Cause" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In:

Related Topics