Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Paul v. Virginia

 
US Supreme Court: Paul v. Virginia

8 Wall. (75 U.S.) 168 (1869), argued 12 Oct. 1869, decided 1 Nov. 1869 by vote of 8 to 0; Field for the Court. During the nineteenth century, fire and life insurance companies were among the first corporations to market products on a national basis. To encourage the development of local enterprise, many states levied discriminatory taxes and license fees against nonresident, or “foreign,” insurance companies chartered in other states. Such protectionist legislation was directed chiefly against large corporations in the Northeast. Paul v. Virginia was a test case financed by the National Board of Fire Underwriters to challenge these discriminatory practices. The case arose when Paul, an agent for a number of New York fire insurance companies, was convicted under a Virginia law for selling insurance without a license.

Company lawyers argued that corporations were “citizens” as defined in the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and that insurance sales were transactions in interstate commerce under Article I, section 8. A victory on the Commerce Clause issue would have preempted the states from regulating or taxing any aspects of interstate insurance sales.

A unanimous Supreme Court held against the insurance industry on both questions, thereby allowing state protectionist legislation to continue. The decision reflected the nineteenth‐century view that corporations were not citizens for purposes of the Privileges and Immunities Clause. The Court ultimately held, in United States v. South‐Eastern Underwriters Association (1944), that the insurance business affected interstate commerce, but by then state regulatory systems were well entrenched. Congress recognized this fact by authorizing the continuation of state insurance regulation through the McCarran‐Ferguson Act of 1945.

See also Citizenship; Commerce Power; Privileges and Immunities.

— Philip L. Merkel

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia: Paul v. Virginia
Top
Paul v. Virginia
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 8, 12, 1869
Decided November 1, 1869
Full case name Samuel Paul v. Virginia
Citations 75 U.S. 168 (more)
75 U.S. (8 Wall) 168; 19 L. Ed. 357; 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1092
Holding
A corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause and issuing a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Field
Laws applied
U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8. and U.S. Const. Art. IV, § 2

Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. (8 Wall) 168 (1869), was a historic case in corporate law in which the United States Supreme Court held that a corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause. Of greater consequence, the Court further held that "issuing a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce," effectively removing the business of insurance beyond Congress' legislative reach.

Contents

Case history

In the 19th century, the insurance business was exclusively regulated by the States individually. As a result, a patchwork of separate regulations proliferated to the dismay of insurance companies which sought uniform regulation across States. In an effort to promote federal regulation of the insurance industry, a number of New York insurance companies orchestrated a test case that they hoped would invalidate State regulation. On February 3, 1866, the legislature of Virginia had passed a statute provided that no insurance company, not incorporated under the laws of the State, should carry on its business within the State without previously obtaining a license for that purpose; and that it should not receive such license until it had deposited with the treasurer of the State bonds in an amount varying from thirty to fifty thousand dollars.

In May, 1866, Samuel Paul, a resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, was appointed the agent of the New York insurance companies, to carry on the general business of insurance against fire. He then applied for a license to act as such agent within the State, offering at the time to comply with all the requirements of the statute with the exception of the provision requiring a deposit of bonds with the treasurer of the State. Based on his failure to comply with the requirements of the statute, the license was refused. Notwithstanding this refusal he undertook to act in the State as agent for the New York companies without any license.

Subsequent to the issuance of a fire insurance policy to a citizen of Virginia, Paul was indicted and convicted in the Circuit Court of the city of Petersburg, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50. On error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State, this judgment was affirmed, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court on the ground of the writ of error being that the judgment below violated Privileges and Immunities Clause, which provides that "the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the of citizens in the several States;" and the Commerce Clause, which empowers Congress "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States."

Reversal

In 1944, the Supreme Court overturned the holding of Paul v. Virginia in United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, finding that insurance transactions were subject to federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.[1]

Notes

  1. ^ 322 U.S. 533, 64 S. Ct. 1162, 88 L. Ed. 1440, 1944 U.S. LEXIS 1199

See also

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

US Supreme Court. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. Copyright © 1992, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Paul v. Virginia" Read more