| This article relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject, rather than references from independent authors and third-party publications. Please add citations from reliable sources. (September 2010) |
The Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities is a ranking system of 500 world universities by scientific paper volume, impact, and performance output. The ranking is published by the Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT)[1] The project employs bibliometric methods to analyze and rank the scientific paper performance. In addition to the overall ranking, HEEACT publishes a list of the top 300 universities by six fields and ten subjects of science and technology. [2]
The rankings were introduced in 2007. The original ranking methodology favored toward universities with medical schools. In 2008, HEEACT began publishing a "Field Based Ranking" including six fields: agriculture and environmental sciences (AGE), clinical medicine (MED), engineering, computing, and technology (ENG), life sciences (LIFE), natural sciences (SCI), and social sciences (SOC).[3]
In 2010, HEEACT began publishing subject rankings in fields of various field of science and technology. Science fields are divided into physics, chemistry, mathematics, and geosciences. Technology fields are split up into electrical engineering, computer science, mechanical engineering, chemical engineering (including energy and fuels), materials science, and civil engineering (including environmental engineering).
|
Contents
|
The HEEACT rankings use the following criteria:
Quantitative data is drawn from Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). The data is normalized by faculty number to account for different institution sizes. The indicators used in this methodology highly emphasize research quality (80% of the performance score) and short-term research performance (55% of the score).
Due to disagreement about ranking results, the Taiwanese education authority has announced that the government will not continue support the Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan to do this ranking in 2012.Taiwan refuse to continue supporting the HEEACT ranking</ref>
Agriculture & Environment Sciences
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | University | Country |
| 01 | 01 | 01 | University of California- Davis | USA |
| 02 | 02 | 02 | Wageningen University | Netherlands |
| 03 | 03 | 03 | Cornell University | USA |
| 04 | 04 | 04 | University of California- Berkeley | USA |
| 05 | 05 | 05 | University of Wisconsin- Madison | USA |
| 06 | 06 | 06 | University of Florida | USA |
| 07 | 08 | 09 | Michigan State University | USA |
| 08 | 07 | 08 | University of Minnesota- Twin Cities | USA |
| 09 | 10 | 11 | Harvard University | USA |
| 10 | 15 | 19 | Ghent University | Belgium |
| 11 | 11 | 14 | Oregon State University | USA |
| 12 | 14 | 10 | The University of British Columbia | Canada |
| 13 | 12 | 13 | Duke University | USA |
| 14 | 09 | 07 | University of Georgia | USA |
| 15 | 13 | 48 | University of Copenhagen | Denmark |
| 16 | 19 | 17 | The University of Tokyo | Japan |
| 17 | 20 | 20 | University of Arizona | USA |
| 18 | 16 | 16 | Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | Sweden |
| 19 | 17 | 15 | University of Helsinki | Finland |
| 20 | 18 | 18 | University of Illinois- Urbana-Champaign | USA |
Clinical Medicine
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | University | Country |
| 01 | 01 | 01 | Harvard University | USA |
| 02 | 02 | 02 | Johns Hopkins University | USA |
| 03 | 03 | 03 | University of California- San Francisco | USA |
| 04 | 05 | 04 | University of California- Los Angeles | USA |
| 05 | 06 | 12 | University of Toronto | Canada |
| 06 | 07 | 05 | University of Washington- Seattle | USA |
| 07 | 04 | 07 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
| 08 | 08 | 06 | University of Pittsburgh- Pittsburgh | USA |
| 09 | 12 | 10 | Mayo Clinic College of Medicine | USA |
| 10 | 11 | 08 | Duke University | USA |
| 11 | 10 | 09 | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor | USA |
| 12 | 9 | 11 | Columbia University | USA |
| 13 | 13 | 13 | Stanford University | USA |
| 14 | 15 | 14 | University College London | United Kingdom |
| 15 | 14 | 16 | The University of Texas- M. D. Anderson Cancer Center | USA |
| 16 | 17 | 15 | Karolinska Institutet | Sweden |
| 17 | 16 | 19 | University of California- San Diego | USA |
| 18 | 19 | 18 | University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill | USA |
| 19 | 18 | 17 | Yale University | USA |
| 20 | 20 | 20 | Washington University in St. Louis | USA |
Engineering, Computing & Technology
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | University | Country |
| 01 | 01 | 02 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
| 02 | 02 | 01 | University of California- Berkeley | USA |
| 03 | 06 | 05 | Tsinghua University | China |
| 04 | 04 | 03 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
| 05 | 05 | 04 | Stanford University | USA |
| 06 | 03 | 06 | Georgia Institute of Technology | USA |
| 07 | 10 | 14 | Nanyang Technological University | Singapore |
| 08 | 07 | 08 | University of Illinois- Urbana-Champaign | USA |
| 09 | 08 | 10 | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor | USA |
| 10 | 12 | 11 | University of Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| 11 | 09 | 07 | Pennsylvania State University- University Park | USA |
| 12 | 17 | 21 | Seoul National University | South Korea |
| 13 | 13 | 13 | Harvard University | USA |
| 14 | 14 | 12 | The University of Tokyo | Japan |
| 15 | 11 | 09 | Tohoku University | Japan |
| 16 | 19 | 15 | Imperial College London | United Kingdom |
| 17 | 18 | 23 | Northwestern University | USA |
| 18 | 15 | 16 | Swiss Federal Institute of Technology- Zurich | Switzerland |
| 19 | 30 | 41 | National Cheng Kung University | ROC(Taiwan) |
| 20 | 24 | 38 | Zhejiang University | China |
Life Sciences
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | University | Country |
| 01 | 01 | 01 | Harvard University | USA |
| 02 | 02 | 02 | Johns Hopkins University | USA |
| 03 | 03 | 03 | University of California- San Francisco | USA |
| 04 | 06 | 06 | University of California- San Diego | USA |
| 05 | 04 | 04 | Stanford University | USA |
| 06 | 08 | 11 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
| 07 | 12 | 12 | University of Oxford | United Kingdom |
| 08 | 09 | 07 | University of Washington- Seattle | USA |
| 09 | 07 | 05 | Yale University | USA |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | University College London | United Kingdom |
| 11 | 05 | 08 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
| 12 | 11 | 9 | University of California- Los Angeles | USA |
| 13 | 13 | 13 | University of Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| 14 | 18 | 18 | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor | USA |
| 15 | 16 | 15 | Washington University in St. Louis | USA |
| 16 | 14 | 16 | University of Toronto | Canada |
| 17 | 17 | 17 | The University of Tokyo | Japan |
| 18 | 15 | 14 | Columbia University | USA |
| 19 | 19 | 19 | Duke University | USA |
| 20 | 27 | 35 | Imperial College London | United Kingdom |
Physical, Chemical
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | University | Country |
| 01 | 01 | 01 | University of California- Berkeley | USA |
| 02 | 02 | 02 | The University of Tokyo | Japan |
| 03 | 03 | 03 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
| 04 | 04 | 04 | California Institute of Technology | USA |
| 05 | 05 | 05 | Harvard University | USA |
| 06 | 06 | 07 | Stanford University | USA |
| 07 | 07 | 06 | University of Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| 08 | 08 | 08 | Princeton University | USA |
| 09 | 12 | 16 | University of California- Los Angeles | USA |
| 10 | 09 | 12 | University of Washington- Seattle | USA |
| 11 | 16 | 15 | University of Oxford | United Kingdom |
| 12 | 10 | 9 | Kyoto University | Japan |
| 13 | 11 | 19 | Columbia University | USA |
| 14 | 15 | 13 | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor | USA |
| 15 | 14 | 10 | Pennsylvania State University- University Park | USA |
| 16 | 13 | 17 | Swiss Federal Institute of Technology- Zurich | Switzerland |
| 17 | 23 | 21 | University of Illinois- Urbana-Champaign | USA |
| 18 | 20 | 23 | University of Wisconsin- Madison | USA |
| 19 | 26 | 32 | University of Maryland- College Park | USA |
| 20 | 22 | 24 | University of Paris VI: Pierre et Marie Curie | France |
Social Sciences
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | University | Country |
| 01 | 01 | 01 | Harvard University | USA |
| 02 | 02 | 02 | University of Michigan- Ann Arbor | USA |
| 03 | 05 | 05 | Columbia University | USA |
| 04 | 03 | 04 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
| 05 | 04 | 03 | University of California- Los Angeles | USA |
| 06 | 06 | 08 | Stanford University | USA |
| 07 | 07 | 06 | University of Washington- Seattle | USA |
| 08 | 11 | 12 | University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill | USA |
| 09 | 10 | 09 | University of California - Berkeley | USA |
| 10 | 14 | 13 | University of Minnesota- Twin Cities | USA |
| 11 | 08 | 11 | Johns Hopkins University | USA |
| 12 | 09 | 07 | The University of Chicago | USA |
| 13 | 13 | 14 | Yale University | USA |
| 14 | 12 | 18 | Duke University | USA |
| 15 | 28 | 29 | University of Oxford | United Kingdom |
| 16 | 16 | 22 | University of Toronto | Canada |
| 17 | 20 | 10 | University of Wisconsin- Madison | USA |
| 18 | 15 | 17 | Northwestern University | USA |
| 19 | 21 | 23 | University of Pittsburgh- Pittsburgh | USA |
| 20 | 23 | 19 | University of California- San Francisco | USA |
Physics (includes Astronomy and Space Science)
Chemistry
Mathematics
Geosciences
Electrical Engineering
Computer Science
Civil Engineering (including Environmental Engineering)
Mechanical Engineering
Chemical Engineering (including Energy & Fuels)
Materials Science
The Australian higher education indicated that the 2007 performance ranking of scientific papers for world universities produced by HEEACT is a useful addition to the present world university ranks because of its rigorous method and robust results, which are made possible by its more modest scope. [4] There are more comments on the HEEACT rankings. The senior research fellow of Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Wu Yi-shan, claimed that the HEEACT ranking is the best ranking system he has ever seen. Wu indicated that the HEEACT ranking considers both long term and short term performance of a university. The idea of combining long term and short term ranking indicators is a pioneering thought. [5] Richard Holmes posted on University Ranking Watch and noted: “Although the Shanghai rankings show a high correlation with other rankings (based on a tiny sample of US universities) the HEEACT rankings from Taiwan do somewhat better.” [6] Vice-President Research for the University of Toronto, Professor Paul Young, remarked that “the HEEACT rankings are relatively new, they are an important and methodologically robust measure of the quantity and quality of research performed by universities around the world.” [7]Also, dean of academic affairs at National Taiwan University, Chiang Been-Huang stated that “2009 Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities by HEEACT are conducted based on objective figures.” [8]
|
||||||||||||||
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)