Phronetic social science

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Bent Flyvbjerg. (Discuss) Proposed since May 2012.

Phronetic social science is an approach to the study of social – including political and economic – phenomena based on a contemporary interpretation of the Aristotelian concept phronesis, variously translated as practical judgment, common sense, or prudence. Phronesis is the intellectual virtue used to deliberate about which social actions are good or bad for humans. Phronetic social scientists study social phenomena with a focus on values and power. Researchers ask and answer the following four value-rational questions for specific instances of social action:

1. Where are we going?
2. Is this development desirable?
3. Who gains and who loses, and by which mechanisms of power?
4. What, if anything, should we do about it?

Phronetic social science was first described by Oxford University professor Bent Flyvbjerg in his book Making Social Science Matter^[1] published in 2001. Here he presented phronetic social science as an alternative to epistemic social science, that is, social science modeled after the natural sciences. Flyvbjerg states that despite centuries of trying the natural science model still does not work in social science: No predictive social theories have been arrived at as yet, if prediction is understood in the natural science sense. Flyvbjerg held that as long as social science would try to emulate natural science, social science would stand as loser in the Science Wars. If, however, the social sciences modeled themselves after phronesis they would be strong where the natural sciences are weak, namely in the deliberation about values and power that is essential to social and economic development in modern society. Flyvbjerg's position was further developed in the so-called Flyvbjerg Debate and in Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis, edited by Flyvbjerg, Landman, and Schram (2012), which contains further theoretical elaborations and a set of exemplary case studies in phronetic social science.^[2]

See also

• Phronesis
• Praxis intervention

Sources and further reading

• Bent Flyvbjerg, Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (Cambridge University Press, 2001) ISBN 0-521-77568-X
• Bent Flyvbjerg, Todd Landman, and Sanford Schram, Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
• Clifford Geertz, "Empowering Aristotle." Science, vol. 293, July 6, 2001, p. 53.
• Ted Schatzki, "Social Science in Society." Inquiry, vol. 45, no. 1, 2002, pp. 119–138.
• Francis Schrag, "What Future for Social Science?" Educational Theory, vol. 54, no. 1, 2004, pp. 89–101.
• Sanford F. Schram, "Beyond Paradigm: Resisting the Assimilation of Phronetic Social Science." Politics and Society, vol. 32, no. 3, September 2004, pp. 417–433.
• Schram, Sanford F. and Brian Caterino, 2006 eds. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. New York: New York University Press.]
• Russell K. Schutt, "Review Essay on Making Social Science Matter." Field Methods, vol. 14, no. 2, May 2002, pp. 228–240.

References

External links

• What is phronetic social science?
• Resources for phronetic social science