These forms of special-purpose government are utilized in the United States and in other countries. In the early 2000s special-purpose governments were the fastest growing type of local government in the nation (municipalities were second). Port authorities are tax-free corporations funded by user fees and/or proceeds from tax-free bonds. Their function is typically legally limited to the financing, construction, and operation of facilities and projects involving rivers, lakes, oceans, and other waterways, such as canals, harbors, docks, wharves, and terminals. One hundred fourteen U.S. metropolitan areas had port authorities with varying levels of function and authority in 1987. The oldest port authority in the United States is likely that of Portland, Oregon, established in 1917. The most well-known port authority in the United States is the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, established in 1921. It is exceptional because it serves two different states and because the actions of its governing body may be vetoed by the governors of New York and New Jersey. Sometimes port authority activities have been controversial, for instance over the question of whether port authority autonomy fosters growth and development inconsistent with public goals.
Bibliography
Foster, Kathryn A. The Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997.
Mitchell, Jerry, ed. Public Authorities and Public Policy: The Business of Government. New York: Greenwood Press, 1992.
In Canada and the United States a port authority (less commonly a port district) is a governmental or quasi-governmental public authority for a special-purpose district usually formed by a legislative body (or bodies) to operate ports and other transportation infrastructure.
Port authorities are usually governed by boards or commissions, which are commonly appointed by governmental chief executives, often from different jurisdictions.[1] For example, in Canada the federal Minister of Transport selects one board member, the local chief executive one, and the rest of the board are at the recommendation of port users to the federal Minister. In Canada all port authorities have a federal or Crown charter called Letters Patent.
Most port authorities are financially self-supporting. In addition to owning land, setting fees, and sometimes levying taxes, port districts can also operate shipping terminals, airports, railroads, and irrigation facilities.
In Mexico the federal government created sixteen port administrations in 1994–1995 called Administración Portuaria Integral (API) in Spanish, as result of the Ley de Puertos of 1993. These are organized as variable capital corporations (Sociedad Anónima de Capital Variable or S.A. de C.V.), with the intent of creating more private investment in a state owned sector.
Numerous Caribbean nations also have port authorities, including those of Aruba, British Virgin Islands, Bahamas, Jamaica, Cayman Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Lucia, St. Maarten, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.[2]
Central and South America also have port agencies such as autoridad and consorcio (authority and consortium).[citation needed]
|
Contents
|
The distinction between inland and being marine is occasionally open to discussion. No distinction is made here between river and Great Lakes ports.
With date of Letters Patent.
|
Atlantic
Great Lakes
|
Pacific
St. Lawrence Seaway
|
Charter date in parenthesis.
|
Atlantic
Gulf of Mexico
|
Great Lakes / St. Lawrence Seaway
Pacific
|
Listed from northwest to southeast. API is Administración Portuaria Integral.
|
Pacific |
Gulf of Mexico |
In the United Kingdom operators of ports and harbours become de facto Port Authorities under several pieces of legislation. Examples include the:-
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)