(paleontology) A suborder of extinct reptiles of the order Thecodontia comprising bipedal, unarmored or feebly armored forms which resemble dinosaurs in many skull features but retain a primitive pelvis.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: Pseudosuchia |
(paleontology) A suborder of extinct reptiles of the order Thecodontia comprising bipedal, unarmored or feebly armored forms which resemble dinosaurs in many skull features but retain a primitive pelvis.
| 5min Related Video: Pseudosuchia |
| Wikipedia: Pseudosuchia |
Pseudosuchia ("false crocodiles") is the name originally given to a group of prehistoric reptiles from the Triassic period. The name has been variously interpreted, and it is still sometimes, if infrequently, used in scientific literature today.
The name Pseudosuchia was coined by Karl Alfred von Zittel in 1887-1890 to include three taxa (two aetosaurs and Dyoplax) that were superficially crocodilian-like, but were not actually crocodilian. Hence the name "false crocodiles".
In mid-twentieth century textbooks like Romer's Vertebrate Paleontology and Colbert's Evolution of the Vertebrates the Pseudosuchia constitute one of the suborders of the Thecodontia. Zittel's aetosaurs were now placed in their own suborder. For typical Pseudosuchians, Colbert uses the example of small lightly-built archosaurs such as Ornithosuchus and Hesperosuchus, both of which were at the time reconstructed as bipeds like miniature (length about 1 meter) Theropods. These little animals were assumed to be the ancestors of all later archosaurs. The name however also became a sort of wastebasket taxon for all thecodonts that didn't fit in the other three suborders. Even Sharovipteryx and Longisquama have been regarded as pseudosuchians.
Under the cladistic system, Pseudosuchia was recognised as a paraphyletic assemblage, and hence invalid. Some writers however, such as Gauthier and Padian (1985) and Gauthier (1986) have tried to establish this name in a cladistic context, using it as a monophyletic stem-based taxon for crocodile-ancestors and their descendants (including crocodiles, which makes the original name somewhat ironic). These definitions include "Crocodiles and all archosaurs closer to crocodiles than to birds" (Gauthier and Padian), "Extant crocodiles and all extinct archosaurs that are closer to crocodiles than they are to birds" (Gauthier 1986), and more recently "the most inclusive clade within Archosauria that includes Crocodylia but not Aves" (Senter 2005).
A different definition was suggested by Benton and Clark, 1988: the node-based taxon including the Rauisuchidae and the aetosaurs. However, relations between those two groups and other archosaurs are controversial, and so this clade may be invalid (or include living crocodiles).
Paul Sereno rejects the term Pseudosuchia, and it is not often applied; his Crurotarsi being more often used instead (another partial synonym is Benton and Clark's Crocodylotarsi).
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Evolution of the Reptiles (zoology) | |
| Desmatosuchus | |
| Euparkeriidae |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Pseudosuchia". Read more |