For more information on quotient rule, visit Britannica.com.
| Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: quotient rule |
For more information on quotient rule, visit Britannica.com.
| 5min Related Video: Quotient rule |
| Wikipedia: Quotient rule |
In calculus, the quotient rule is a method of finding the derivative of a function that is the quotient of two other functions for which derivatives exist.
If the function one wishes to differentiate, f(x), can be written as

and h(x) ≠ 0, then the rule states that the derivative of g(x) / h(x) is equal to:
![f'(x) = \frac{g'(x)h(x) - g(x)h'(x)}{[h(x)]^2}.](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/a/c/e/acedbab55b97d9c1bb42c57302faea9a.png)
Or, more precisely, if all x in some open set containing the number a satisfy h(x) ≠ 0; and g'(a) and h'(a) both exist; then, f'(a) exists as well and:
![f'(a)=\frac{g'(a)h(a) - g(a)h'(a)}{[h(a)]^2}.](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/c/1/f/c1fb89063c9c2285cffa29f34ca44490.png)
Contents |
The derivative of (4x − 2) / (x2 + 1) is:
![\begin{align}\frac{d}{dx}\left[\frac{(4x - 2)}{x^2 + 1}\right] &= \frac{(x^2 + 1)(4) - (4x - 2)(2x)}{(x^2 + 1)^2}\\&= \frac{(4x^2 + 4) - (8x^2 - 4x)}{(x^2 + 1)^2} &= \frac{-4x^2 + 4x + 4}{(x^2 + 1)^2}\end{align}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/8/a/3/8a33ee87fb73468b1b7e0681b9e4cd01.png)
In the example above, the choices
were made. Analogously, the derivative of sin(x) / x2 (when x ≠ 0) is:

Another example is:

whereas g(x) = 2x2 and h(x) = x3, and g'(x) = 4x and h'(x) = 3x2.
The derivative of f(x) is determined as follows:

This can be checked by using laws of exponents and the power rule:


The quotient rule is not useful at points where either the numerator or denominator are not differentiable; it's possible that the quotient may be differentiable at such points. For example, consider the function:

where |x| denotes the absolute value of x. This is of course simply the function f(x) = 1, so it is differentiable everywhere and in particular f'(0) = 0. If we try to use the quotient rule to compute f'(0), however, an undefined value will result, since |x| is nondifferentiable at x = 0.
Suppose f(x) = g(x) / h(x) where
and g and h are differentiable.

We pull out the 1 / Δx and combine the fractions in the numerator:

Adding and subtracting g(x)h(x) in the numerator:

We factor this and multiply the 1 / Δx through the numerator:

Now we move the limit through:

By the definition of the difference quotient, the limits in the numerator are derivatives, so we have:
![= \frac{g'(x)h(x) - g(x)h'(x)}{[h(x)]^2}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/7/9/4/79455cf2bc5ba292947ea4e5fa92ab3f.png)
Consider the identity
![\frac{u}{v}\; =\; \frac{1}{4}\left[ \left( u+\frac{1}{v} \right)^{2}-\; \left( u-\frac{1}{v} \right)^{2} \right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/6/0/b/60bc449c145864d6aff210c363124d93.png)
Then
![\frac{d\left( \frac{u}{v} \right)}{dx}\; =\; \frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{4}\left[ \left( u+\frac{1}{v} \right)^{2}-\; \left( u-\frac{1}{v} \right)^{2} \right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/3/c/b/3cb39a303706e6cc43740c40ab8617e0.png)
Leading to
![\frac{d\left( \frac{u}{v} \right)}{dx}\; =\; \frac{1}{4}\left[ 2\left( u+\frac{1}{v} \right)\left( \frac{du}{dx}-\frac{dv}{v^{2}dx} \right)-\; 2\left( u-\frac{1}{v} \right)\left( \frac{du}{dx}+\frac{dv}{v^{2}dx} \right) \right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/e/c/5/ec5d0c8ab79b13a3b4dc0fbb63918567.png)
Multiplying out leads to
![\frac{d\left( \frac{u}{v} \right)}{dx}\; =\; \frac{1}{4}\left[ \frac{4}{v}\frac{du}{dx}-\frac{4u}{v^{2}}\frac{dv}{dx} \right]](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/5/4/3/5439cee6a06381bcc7791e123632cc92.png)
Finally, taking a common denominator leaves us with the expected result
![\frac{d\left( \frac{u}{v} \right)}{dx}\; =\; \frac{\left[ v\frac{du}{dx}-u\frac{dv}{dx} \right]}{v^{2}}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/d/b/b/dbbafcd15e3b438d569c42f5639cb51d.png)
An even more elegant proof is a consequence of the law about total differentials, which states that the total differential,

of any function in any set of quantities is decomposable in this way, no matter what the independent variables in a function are (i.e., no matter which variables are taken so that they may not be expressed as functions of other variables). This means that, if N and D are both functions of an independent variable x, and F = N(x) / D(x), then it must be true both that

and that
.But we know that dN = N'(x)dx and dD = D'(x)dx.
Substituting and setting these two total differentials equal to one another (since they represent limits which we can manipulate), we obtain the equation

which requires that
.We compute the partials on the right:
;
.If we substitute them into (#),


which gives us the quotient rule, since, by (*),
.This proof, of course, is just another, more systematic (even if outmoded) way of proving the theorem in terms of limits, and is therefore equivalent to the first proof above - and even reduces to it, if you make the right substitutions in the right places. Students of multivariable calculus will recognize it as one of the chain rules for functions of multiple variables.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Best of the Web: Quotient rule |
Some good "Quotient rule" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
| Year 1677 (in Science & Technology) | |
| Reciprocal rule | |
| Parametric derivative |
| What is a Networking Quotient? Read answer... | |
| What is the quotient of 8? Read answer... | |
| Which number is the quotient? Read answer... |
| What is the rule for determining the number of digits in a quotient? | |
| Procedure in Quotient point system in basket ball rules? | |
| What are the rules to Estimating products and quotients of mixed numbers? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Quotient rule". Read more |
Mentioned in