Residue: Information from Answers.com

In mathematics, more specifically complex analysis, the residue is a complex number which describes the behavior of line integrals of a meromorphic function around a singularity. Residues can be computed quite easily and, once known, allow the determination of more complicated path integrals via the residue theorem.

1 Definition
2 Motivation
3 Calculating residues
4 See also
5 External links
6 References

Definition

The residue of a meromorphic function $f$ at an isolated singularity $a$ , often denoted $\operatorname{Res}(f,a)$ is the unique value $R$ such that $f (z) - R / (z - a)$ has an analytic antiderivative in a punctured disk $0<\vert z-a\vert<\delta$ . Alternatively, residues can be calculated by finding Laurent series expansions, and are sometimes defined in terms of them.

Motivation

As an example, consider the contour integral

$\oint_C {e^z \over z^5}\,dz$

where C is some simple closed curve about 0.

Let us evaluate this integral without using standard integral theorems that may be available to us. Now, the Taylor series for $e z$ is well-known, and we substitute this series into the integrand. The integral then becomes

$\oint_C {1 \over z^5}\left(1+z+{z^2 \over 2!} + {z^3\over 3!} + {z^4 \over 4!} + {z^5 \over 5!} + {z^6 \over 6!} + \cdots\right)\,dz.$

Let us bring the 1/z⁵ factor into the series, so we obtain

$\oint_C \left({1 \over z^5}+{z \over z^5}+{z^2 \over 2!\;z^5} + {z^3\over 3!\;z^5} + {z^4 \over 4!\;z^5} + {z^5 \over 5!\;z^5} + {z^6 \over 6!\;z^5} + \cdots\right)\,dz$

$=\oint_C \left({1 \over\;z^5}+{1 \over\;z^4}+{1 \over 2!\;z^3} + {1\over 3!\;z^2} + {1 \over 4!\;z} + {1\over\;5!} + {z \over 6!} + \cdots\right)\,dz.$

The integral now collapses to a much simpler form. Recall that

$\oint_C {1 \over z^n} \,dz=0,\quad n \in \mathbb{Z},\mbox{ for }n \ne 1.$

So now the integral around C of every other term not in the form cz⁻¹ becomes zero, and the integral is reduced to

$\oint_C {1 \over 4!\;z} \,dz={1 \over 4!}\oint_C{1 \over z}\,dz={1 \over 4!}(2\pi i) = {\pi i \over 12}.$

The value 1/4! is the residue of e^z/z⁵ at z = 0, and is notated as

$\mathrm{Res}_0 {e^z \over z^5},\ \mathrm{or}\ \mathrm{Res}_{z=0} {e^z \over z^5},\ \mathrm{or}\ \mathrm{Res}(f,0).$

Calculating residues

Suppose a punctured disk D = {z : 0 < |z − c| < R} in the complex plane is given and f is a holomorphic function defined (at least) on D. The residue Res(f, c) of f at c is the coefficient a₋₁ of (z − c)⁻¹ in the Laurent series expansion of f around c. Various methods exist for calculating this value, and the choice of which method to use depends on the function in question, and on the nature of the singularity.

According to Cauchy's integral formula, we have:

$\operatorname{Res}(f,c) = {1 \over 2\pi i} \int_\gamma f(z)\,dz$

where γ traces out a circle around c in a counterclockwise manner. We may choose the path γ to be a circle of radius ε around c, where ε is as small as we desire. This may be used for calculation in cases where the integral can be calculated directly, but it is usually the case that residues are used to simplify calculation of integrals, and not the other way around.

Removable singularities

If the function f can be continued to a holomorphic function on the whole disk { z : |z − c| < R }, then Res(f, c) = 0. The converse is not generally true.

Simple poles

At a simple pole c, the residue of f is given by:

$\operatorname{Res}(f,c)=\lim_{z\to c}(z-c)f(z).$

It may be that the function f can be expressed as a quotient of two functions, f(z)=g(z)/h(z), where g and h are holomorphic functions in a punctured neighbourhood of c, with h(c) = 0 and h'(c) ≠ 0. In such a case, the above formula simplifies to:

$\operatorname{Res}(f,c) = \frac{g(c)}{h'(c)}.$

Limit formula for higher order poles

More generally, if c is a pole of order n, then the residue of f around z = c can be found by the formula:

$\mathrm{Res}(f,c) = \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \lim_{z \to c} \frac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}}\left( (z-c)^{n}f(z) \right).$

This formula can be very useful in determining the residues for low-order poles. For higher order poles, the calculations can become unmanageable, and series expansion is usually easier. Also for essential singularities, residues often must be taken directly from series expansions.

Series methods

If parts or all of a function can be expanded into a Taylor series or Laurent series, which may be possible if the parts or the whole of the function has a standard series expansion, then calculating the residue is significantly simpler than by other methods.

1. As a first example, consider calculating the residues at the singularities of the function

$f(z)={\sin{z} \over z^2-z}$

which may be used to calculate certain contour integrals. This function appears to have a singularity at z = 0, but if one factorizes the denominator and thus writes the function as

$f(z)={\sin{z} \over z(z-1)}$

it is apparent that the singularity at z = 0 is a removable singularity and then the residue at z = 0 is therefore 0.

The only other singularity is at z = 1. Recall the expression for the Taylor series for a function g(z) about z = a:

$g(z) = g(a) + g'(a)(z-a) + {g''(a)(z-a)^2 \over 2!} + {g'''(a)(z-a)^3 \over 3!}+ \cdots$

So, for g(z) = sin z and a = 1 we have

$\sin{z} = \sin{1} + \cos{1}(z-1)+{-\sin{1}(z-1)^2 \over 2!} + {-\cos{1}(z-1)^3 \over 3!}+\cdots.$

and for g(z) = 1/z and a = 1 we have

$\frac1z = \frac1 {(z-1)+1} = 1 - (z-1) + (z-1)^2 - (z-1)^3 + \cdots.$

Multiplying those two series and introducing 1/(z − 1) gives us

$\frac{\sin{z}} {z(z-1)} = {\sin{1} \over z-1} + (\cos{1}-\sin1) + (z-1) \left(-\frac{\sin{1}}{2!} - \cos1 + \sin1\right) + \cdots.$

So the residue of f(z) at z = 1 is sin 1.

2. The next example shows that, computing a residue by series expansion, a major role is played by the Lagrange inversion theorem. Let

$u(z):=\sum_{k\geq 1}u_k z^k$

be an entire function, and let

$v(z):=\sum_{k\geq 1}v_k z^k$

with positive radius of convergence, and with $\textstyle v_1\neq 0$ . So $\textstyle v(z)$ has a local inverse $\textstyle V(z)$ at 0, and $\textstyle u(1/V(z))$ is meromorphic at 0. Then we have:

$\mathrm{Res_0}\big(u(1/V)\big)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} ku_k v_k$ .

Indeed,

$\mathrm{Res_0}\big(u(1/V)\big)=\mathrm{Res_0}\Big(\sum_{k\geq 1}u_k V(z)^{-k}\Big)=\sum_{k\geq 1} u_k \mathrm{Res_0}\big(V(z)^{-k}\big)$

because the first series converges uniformly on any small circle around 0. Using the Lagrange inversion theorem

$\mathrm{Res_0}\big(V(z)^{-k}\big)=kv_k$ ,

and we get the above expression. Note that, with the corresponding stronger symmetric assumptions on $\textstyle u(z)$ and $\textstyle v(z)$ , it also follows

$\mathrm{Res_0}\big(u(1/V)\big)=\mathrm{Res_0}\big(v(1/U)\big)$ ,

where $\textstyle U(z)$ is a local inverse of $\textstyle u(z)$ at 0.

External links

References

Ahlfors, Lars (1979). Complex Analysis. McGraw Hill.
Marsden, Jerrold E.; Hoffman, Michael J. (1998). Basic Complex Analysis (3rd ed.). W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0716728771.

This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)

Donate to Wikimedia

	What is gastric residual? Read answer...
	What is a filtration residue? Read answer...
	What is residue is evil.com? Read answer...

	What is residual hearinginfromation?
	What is residual credit?
	What is a residual insulin?

Residue

Contents