The term ridged band is a description of an area/band of wrinkly skin toward the end of the foreskin. The term ridged is used to describe the area instead of the more commonly used term "wrinkled". It has, especially in regards to phimosis, been called a preputial ring. Ring being analagous to 'band', referring to the shape, and preputial meaning pertaining to the prepuce.
More particularly it refers to the "transitional area from the external to the internal surface of the prepuce," or foreskin.[1]
John R. Taylor, a Canadian pathologist and medical researcher, first used the term "ridged band" instead of "wrinkly skin" and described the ridged band at the Second International Symposium on Circumcision, organized by NOCIRC (an organisation opposing infant circumcision) in San Francisco, 1991, after examining the foreskins of 22 adults obtained at autopsy.[2] The mean age was 37 years, range 22-58.[2] The prepuces were studied grossly and histologically.[2]
The term "ridged band" was subsequently used by Taylor in an anatomical and histological study of the foreskin published in the British Journal of Urology in 1996.[2] Most or all of the ridged band is removed by male circumcision.[2]
|
Contents
|
Taylor described a transversely-ridged band of mucosal tissue located just inside the tip of the foreskin near the mucocutaneous boundary known as preputial sphincter. He characterized this ridged band as "intensely vascular". He described the band as "richly innervated", stated that it "contains more Meissner's corpuscles than does the smooth mucosa", and noted that these corpuscles were found only in the crests of ridges.
This structure is generally part of the tissue that is removed in circumcisions.
Taylor postulates that "the ridged band with its unique structure, tactile corpuscles and other nerves, is primarily sensory tissue".[2] He hypothesizes that Meissner's corpuscles in the ridged band are adapted to detect stretch:
Taylor theorizes that the main function of the ridged band is to trigger sexual reflexes. In a letter to the editor of BJU International, 2007, Taylor writes:
In the Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2007, Taylor states:
A.M. Viens, a member of the Department of Philosophy, St Anne's College, Oxford University, comments:
Viens also criticized Taylor's methodology, on the grounds that the sample size of cadavers was "extremely small".[5]
The effect of circumcision on sexual function is the subject of intense debate. Taylor's view is that "almost certainly, removal of the prepuce and its ridged band distorts penile reflexogenic functions but exactly how and to what extent still remains to be seen".[3]
For an overview of the issues surrounding male circumcision and sexual function, see Sexual effects of circumcision.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)