In ring theory or abstract algebra, a ring homomorphism is a function between two rings which respects the operations of addition and multiplication.
More precisely, if R and S are rings, then a ring homomorphism is a function f : R → S such that[1]
- f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b) for all a and b in R
- f(ab) = f(a) f(b) for all a and b in R
- f(1) = 1
Naturally, if one does not require rings to have a multiplicative identity then the last condition is dropped.
The composition of two ring homomorphisms is a ring homomorphism. It follows that the class of all rings forms a category with ring homomorphisms as the morphisms (cf. the category of rings).
Contents |
Properties
Directly from these definitions, one can deduce:
- f(0) = 0
- f(−a) = −f(a)
- If a has a multiplicative inverse in R, then f(a) has a multiplicative inverse in S and we have f(a−1) = (f(a))−1. Therefore, f induces a group homomorphism from the (multiplicative) group of units of R to the (multiplicative) group of units of S.
- The kernel of f, defined as ker(f) = {a in R : f(a) = 0} is an ideal in R. Every ideal in a commutative ring R arises from some ring homomorphism in this way. For rings with identity, the kernel of a ring homomorphism is a subring without identity.
- The homomorphism f is injective if and only if the ker(f) = {0}.
- The image of f, im(f), is a subring of S.
- If f is bijective, then its inverse f−1 is also a ring homomorphism. f is called an isomorphism in this case, and the rings R and S are called isomorphic. From the standpoint of ring theory, isomorphic rings cannot be distinguished.
- If there exists a ring homomorphism f : R → S then the characteristic of S divides the characteristic of R. This can sometimes be used to show that between certain rings R and S, no ring homomorphisms R → S can exist.
- If Rp is the smallest subring contained in R and Sp is the smallest subring contained in S, then every ring homomorphism f : R → S induces a ring homomorphism fp : Rp → Sp.
- If R is a field, then f is either injective or f is the zero function. (Note, however, that if f preserves the multiplicative identity, then it cannot be the zero function.)
- If both R and S are fields, then im(f) is a subfield of S (if f is not the zero function).
- If R and S are commutative and S has no zero divisors, then ker(f) is a prime ideal of R.
- If R and S are commutative, S is a field, and f is surjective, then ker(f) is a maximal ideal of R.
- For every ring R, there is a unique ring homomorphism Z → R. This says that the ring of integers is an initial object in the category of rings.
Examples
- The function f : Z → Zn, defined by f(a) = [a]n = a mod n is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel nZ (see modular arithmetic).
- There is no ring homomorphism Zn → Z for n > 1.
- If R[X] denotes the ring of all polynomials in the variable X with coefficients in the real numbers R, and C denotes the complex numbers, then the function f : R[X] → C defined by f(p) = p(i) (substitute the imaginary unit i for the variable X in the polynomial p) is a surjective ring homomorphism. The kernel of f consists of all polynomials in R[X] which are divisible by X2 + 1.
- If f : R → S is a ring homomorphism between the commutative rings R and S, then f induces a ring homomorphism between the matrix rings Mn(R) → Mn(S).
Types of ring homomorphisms
A bijective ring homomorphism is called a ring isomorphism. A ring homomorphism whose domain is the same as its range is called a ring endomorphism. A ring automorphism is a bijective endomorphism.
Injective ring homomorphisms are identical to monomorphisms in the category of rings: If f:R→S is a monomorphism which is not injective, then it sends some r1 and r2 to the same element of S. Consider the two maps g1 and g2 from Z[x] to R which map x to r1 and r2, respectively; f o g1 and f o g2 are identical, but since f is a monomorphism this is impossible.
However, surjective ring homomorphisms are vastly different from epimorphisms in the category of rings. For example, the inclusion Z ⊆ Q is a ring epimorphism, but not a surjection. However, they are exactly the same as the strong epimorphisms.
Notes
- ^ See Hazewinkel et. al. (2004), p. 3.
References
- Michiel Hazewinkel, Nadiya Gubareni, Nadezhda Mikhaĭlovna Gubareni, Vladimir V. Kirichenko. Algebras, rings and modules. Volume 1. 2004. Springer, 2004. ISBN 1402026900
See also
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)




