Rouché's theorem, named after Eugène Rouché, states that if the complex-valued functions f and g are holomorphic inside and on some closed contour K, with |g(z)| < |f(z)| on K, then f and f + g have the same number of zeros inside K, where each zero is counted as many times as its multiplicity. This theorem assumes that the contour K is simple, that is, without self-intersections.
|
Contents
|
Theodor Estermann (1902–1991) proved in his book Complex Numbers and Functions the following relation: Let
be a bounded region with continuous boundary
. Two holomorphic functions
have the same number of roots in
, if the strict inequality

holds on the boundary
.
The theorem is usually used to simplify the problem of locating zeros, as follows. Given an analytic function, we write it as the sum of two parts, one of which is simpler and grows faster than (thus dominates) the other part. We can then locate the zeros by looking at only the dominating part. For example, the polynomial
has exactly 5 zeros in the disk
since
for every
, and
, the dominating part, has five zeros in the disk.
It is possible to provide an informal explanation of Rouche's theorem.
Let C be a closed, simple curve (i.e., not self-intersecting). Let h(z) = f(z) + g(z). If f and g are both holomorphic on the interior of C, then h must also be holomorphic on the interior of C. Then, with the conditions imposed above, the Rouche's theorem in its original (and not symmetric) form says that
Notice that the condition |f(z)| > |h(z) − f(z)| means that for any z, the distance from f(z) to the origin is larger than the length of h(z) − f(z), which in the following picture means that for each point on the blue curve, the segment joining it to the origin is larger than the green segment associated with it. Informally we can say that the blue curve f(z) is always closer to the red curve h(z) than it is to the origin.
The previous paragraph shows that h(z) must wind around the origin exactly as many times as f(z). The index of both curves around zero is therefore the same, so by the argument principle, f(z) and h(z) must have the same number of zeros inside C.
One popular, informal way to summarize this argument is as follows: If a person were to walk a dog on a leash around and around a tree, and if the length of the leash is less than the minimum radius of the walk, then the person and the dog go around the tree an equal number of times.
Rouché's theorem can be used to give a short proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra. Let

and choose
and so large that:

Since
has
zeros inside the disk
(because
), it follows from Rouché's theorem that
also has the same number of zeros inside the disk.
One advantage of this proof over the others is that it shows not only that a polynomial must have a zero but the number of its zeros is equal to its degree (counting, as usual, multiplicity).
Another use of Rouché's theorem is to prove the open mapping theorem for analytic functions. We refer to the article for the proof.
The hypothesis ensures both that
and
do not have any roots on the boundary
and that
is not a negative real number for
. Thus the homotopy

is well defined for
, where
.
Clearly,
as
. As
is continuous and integer valued, it follows that
. By the argument principle, this winding number is given by

where NF(K) is the number of zeroes of F inside K, PF(K) is the number of poles inside K. Hence NF = PF. But F is the ratio of two holomorphic functions f and g inside K, and so the zeroes are those of f and the poles are the zeros of g (at least if f and g are coprime polynomials, which we can assume since otherwise, we are free to divide f and g by any common divisor). That is,

as required.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)