(mathematics) If an analytic function of the unit disk to itself sends the origin to the origin then it must be distance-decreasing.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: Schwarz's lemma |
(mathematics) If an analytic function of the unit disk to itself sends the origin to the origin then it must be distance-decreasing.
| 5min Related Video: Schwarz lemma |
| Wikipedia: Schwarz lemma |
In mathematics, the Schwarz lemma, named after Hermann Amandus Schwarz, is a result in complex analysis about holomorphic functions from the open unit disk to itself. The lemma is less celebrated than stronger theorems, such as the Riemann mapping theorem, which it helps to prove. It is however one of the simplest results capturing the rigidity of holomorphic functions.
Contents |
Let

be the open unit disk in the complex plane C centered at the origin and let

be a holomorphic map that fixes the origin, that is,

The Schwarz lemma states that
for all 
and that

Moreover, if
for some 
or if

then f is a rotation, that is,
for some
with 
The proof is a straightforward application of the maximum modulus principle on the function

which is holomorphic on the whole of D, including at the origin (because f fixes the origin). Now if

denotes the closed disk of radius r centered at the origin, then the maximum modulus principle implies that, for r < 1,

for all z in Dr and all zr on the boundary of Dr.
As r approaches 1 we get

Moreover, if there exists a z0 in D such that g(z0) = 1, then applying the maximum modulus principle to g, we obtain that g is constant. Therefore

where a is constant and |a| = 1. This is also the case if |f'(0)| = 1.
A variant of the Schwarz lemma can be stated that is invariant under analytic automorphisms on the unit disk, i.e. bijective holomorphic mappings of the unit disc to itself. This variant is known as the Schwarz–Pick theorem (after Georg Pick):
Let ƒ : D → D be holomorphic. Then, for all z1, z2 ∈ D,

and, for all z ∈ D,

The expression

is the distance of the points z1, z2 in the Poincaré metric, i.e. the metric in the Poincaré disc model for hyperbolic geometry in dimension two. The Schwarz–Pick theorem then essentially states that a holomorphic map of the unit disk into itself decreases the distance of points in the Poincaré metric. If equality holds throughout in one of the two inequalities above (which is equivalent to saying that the holomorphic map preserves the distance in the Poincaré metric) , then ƒ must be an analytic automorphism of the unit disc, given by a Möbius transformation mapping the unit disc to itself.
An analogous statement on the upper half-plane H can be made as follows:
Let
be holomorphic. Then, for all 

This is an easy consequence of the Schwarz–Pick theorem mentioned above: One just needs to remember that the Cayley transform W(z) = (z − i)/(z + i) maps the upper half-plane H conformally onto the unit disc D. Then, the map W o ƒ o W−1 is a holomorphic map from D onto D. Using the Schwarz–Pick theorem on this map, and finally simplifying the results by using the formula for W, we get the desired result. Also, for all z ∈ H,

If equality holds for either the one or the other expressions, then ƒ must be a Möbius transformation with real coefficients. That is, if equality holds, then

with a, b, c, d being real numbers, and ad − bc > 0.
The proof of the Schwarz–Pick theorem follows from Schwarz's lemma and the fact that a Möbius transformation of the form
where |z0| < 1 maps the unit circle to itself. Fix z1 and define the Möbius transformations

Since M(z1) = 0 and the Möbius transformation is invertible, the composition φ(ƒ(M −1(z))) maps 0 to 0 and the unit disk is mapped into itself. Thus we can apply Schwarz's lemma, which is to say

Now calling z2 = M −1(z) (which will still be in the unit disk) yields the desired conclusion

To prove the second part of the theorem, we just let z2 tend to z1.
The Schwarz–Ahlfors–Pick theorem provides an analogous theorem for hyperbolic manifolds.
De Branges' theorem, formerly known as the Bieberbach Conjecture, is an important extension of the lemma, giving restrictions on the higher derivatives of ƒ at 0 in case ƒ is injective; that is, conformal.
The Koebe 1/4 theorem provides a related estimate in the case that ƒ is conformal.
This article incorporates material from Schwarz lemma on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Best of the Web: Schwarz lemma |
Some good "Schwarz lemma" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
| Complex dynamics | |
| Schwarz–Ahlfors–Pick theorem | |
| Schwarz |
| What does the root word lemma mean? Read answer... | |
| What is Euclid's division lemma? Read answer... | |
| Difference between a theorem and lemma? Read answer... |
| What is the difference between dilemma and lemma? | |
| Can you bring a stroller into FAO Schwarz? | |
| Who was Harry Schwarz and what was his role in apartheid? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Schwarz lemma". Read more |