| Topics in journalism |
|---|
| Professional issues |
|
News • Writing • Ethics • Objectivity • Values • Attribution • Defamation • Editorial independence • Education • Other topics |
| Fields |
| Arts • Business • Entertainment • Environment • Fashion • Medicine • Politics • Science • Sports • Tech • Trade • Traffic • Weather |
| Genres |
|
Advocacy • Churnalism • Citizen • Civic • Collaborative • Community • Conspiracy • Database • Gonzo • Investigative • Literary • Muckraker • Narrative • New • Opinion • Peace • Visual • Watchdog |
| Social impact |
|
Fourth Estate • Fifth Estate • Freedom of the press • Infotainment • Media bias • Public relations • Yellow journalism |
| News media |
|
Newspapers • Magazines • News agencies • Broadcast • Online • Photojournalism • Alternative media |
| Roles |
| Journalist • Marketer • Reporter • Editor • Columnist • Commentator • Photographer • Presenter • Meteorologist • Production Manager • Intern |
|
|
Science journalism is a branch of journalism that uses the art of reporting to convey information about science topics to a public forum. The communication of scientific knowledge through mass media requires a special relationship between the world of science and news media, which is still just beginning to form.
The first task of a science journalist is to render the very detailed, specific, and often jargon-laden information produced by scientists into a form that the average media consumer can understand and appreciate, while still communicating the information accurately. Science journalists often do not have advanced training in the particular scientific disciplines that they cover — they may have been scientists or medical doctors before becoming journalists — or have at least exhibited talent in writing about science subjects.
In recent years, the amount of scientific news has grown rapidly with science playing an increasingly central role in society, and interaction between the scientific community and news media has increased. The differences between the methodologies of these two "pillars" of modern society, particularly their distinct ways of developing their realities, have led to some difficulties. Journalism tends to have a stronger bias towards sensationalism and speculative theories than science, whereas science focuses more on fact and empirical measurement.
Science journalists regularly come under criticism for falsely reporting scientific stories. Very often, such as with climate change, this leaves the public under the impression that the scientific community is divided. Science is based on experimental evidence, testing and not dogma, and disputation is a normal activity.[1]
See also
- Popular science
- Public awareness of science
- Scientific literature
- Frontiers of Science
- Science by press conference
External links
- Training Course in Science Journalism
- European Union of Science Journalists' Associations
- National Association of Science Writers (USA)
- Northwest Science Writers Association (Pacific Northwest, USA)
- Association of British Science Writers
- Canadian Science Writers' Association
- Arab Science Journalists Association
- New York University Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program
- Union of Italian Science Journalists (UGIS, Unione Giornalisti Italiani Scientifici)
- World Federation of Science Journalists
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
