|
|
This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2008) |
In economics, a firm will shutdown production when the revenue received from the sale of the goods or services produced cannot even cover the variable costs of production. In that situation, the firm will experience a higher loss when it produces, compared to not producing at all.
Technically, shutdown occurs if marginal revenue is below average variable cost at the profit-maximizing output. Producing anything would not generate returns significant enough to offset any fixed cost and part of the variable cost. By not producing, the firm loses only the fixed cost.
Contents |
Explaining
In the short run, a firm operating at a loss (R < TC or P < ATC) must decide whether to continue to operate or temporarily shutdown.[1] The shutdown rule states “in the short run a firm should continue to operate if price exceeds average variable costs.”[2] Restated the rule is to produce in the short run a firm must earn sufficient revenue to cover its variable costs. [3]The rationale for the rule is straightforward. By shutting down a firm avoids all variable costs.[4] However, the firm must still pay fixed costs.[5] Because fixed cost must be paid regardless of whether a firm operates they should not be considered in deciding whether to produce or shutdown.
Thus in determining whether to shut down a firm should compare total revenue to total variable costs (VC) rather than total costs (FC + VC). If the revenue the firm is receiving is greater than its total variable cost (R > VC) then the firm is covering all variable cost plus there is additional revenue (“contribution”), which can be applied to fixed costs.[6] (The size of the fixed costs is irrelevant as it is a sunk cost. [7]The same consideration is used whether fixed costs are one dollar or one million dollars.) On the other hand if VC > R then the firm is not even covering its production costs and it should immediately shut down. The rule is conventionally stated in terms of price (average revenue) and average variable costs. The rules are equivalent (If you divide both sides of inequality TR > TVC by Q gives P > AVC). If the firms decides to operate firm will continue to produce where marginal revenue equals marginal costs because these conditions insure not only profit maximization (loss minimization) but also maximum contribution.[8]
Another way to state the rule is that a firm should compare the profits from operating to those realized if it shutdown and select the option that produces the greater profit.[9][10] A firm that is shutdown is generating zero revenue and incurring no variable costs. However the firm still has to pay fixed cost. So the firm’s profit equals fixed costs or (- FC). [11]An operating firm is generating revenue, incurring variable costs and paying fixed costs. The operating firm's profit is R - VC - FC . The firm should continue to operate if R - VC - FC ≥ - FC which simplified is R ≥ VC.[12] [13]The difference between revenue, R, and variable costs, VC, is the contribution to fixed costs and any contribution is better than none. Thus, if R ≥ VC then firm should operate. If R < VC the firm should shut down.
Long run consequences
A decision to shutdown means that the firm is temporarily suspending production. It does not mean that the firm is going out of business (exiting the industry). [14]If market conditions improve, and prices increase, the firm can resume production. Shuttingdown is a short run decision. A firm that has shut down is not producing. The firm still retains its capital assets; however, the firm cannot leave the industry or avoid its fixed costs in the short run. Exit is a long term decision. A firm that has exited an industry has avoided all commitments and freed all capital for use in more profitable enterprises.[15]
However, a firm cannot continue to incurr losses indefinitely. In the long run, the firm will have to decide whether to continue in business or to leave the industry and pursue profits elsewhere. The long run decision is based on the relationship of the price and long run average costs.[16] If P ≥ AC then the firm will not exit the industry. If P < AC, then the firm will exit the industry. These comparisons will be made after the firm has made the necessary and feasible long term adjustments. In the long run a firm operates where marginal revenue equals long run marginal costs.[17]
Notes
- ^ Revenue, R, equals price, P, times quantity, Q.
- ^ Samuelson, W & Marks, S Managerial Economics 4th ed. page 227. Wiley 2003.
- ^ Melvin & Boyes, Microeconomics 5th ed. page 222. Houghton Mifflin 2002.
- ^ Pindyck, R & Rubinfeld, D: Microeconomics 5th ed. Page 259 Prentice-Hall 2001.
- ^ Pindyck, R & Rubinfeld, D: Microeconomics 5th ed. Page 259. Prentice-Hall 2001.
- ^ Samuelson, W & Marks, S Managerial Economics 4th ed. page 296. Wiley 2003.
- ^ Perloff, J. Microeconomics 5th ed. Page 237 Pearson 2009.
- ^ Samuelson, W & Marks, S Managerial Economics 5th ed. page 286. Wiley 2006
- ^ Png, I: Managerial Economics page 102 Blackwell 1999.
- ^ Landsburg, S Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. Page 193 South-Western 2002.
- ^ Landsburg, S Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. Page 193 South-Western 2002.
- ^ Png, I: Managerial Economics page 102 Blackwell 1999.
- ^ Landsburg, S Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. Page 194 South-Western 2002.
- ^ Landsburg, S Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. Page 193 South-Western 2002.
- ^ Landsburg, S Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. South-Western 2002.
- ^ In the long run there is no distinction between average variable and average costs because all costs are variable. Landsburg, S Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. Page 167 South-Western 2002.
- ^ Perloff, J: Microeconomics Theory & Applications with Calculus page 266. Pearson 2008
References
- 1. Landsburg, S 2002 Price Theory & Applications, 5th ed. South-Western.
- 2. Melvin & Boyes, 2002 Microeconomics 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin.
- 3. Perloff, J. 2009 Microeconomics 5th ed. Pearson. ISBN 0321584391
- 4. Perloff, J: 2008 Microeconomics Theory & Applications with Calculus Pearson. ISBN 0321277945
- 5. Pindyck, R & Rubinfeld, D: 2001 Microeconomics 5th ed. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0130196738
- 6. Png, I: 1999 Managerial Economics page 102 Blackwell. ISBN 1557869278
- 7. Samuelson, W & Marks, S 2003 Managerial Economics 4th ed. Wiley. ISBN 0470000449
- 8. Samuelson, W & Marks, S 2006 Managerial Economics 5th ed. Wiley. ISBN 047166362X
See also
Further reading
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)




