East Asian Cultural Sphere

East Asian Cultural Sphere
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese	漢字文化圏
Simplified Chinese	汉字文化圈
Transliterations Hakka - Romanization hon55 sii55 vun11 fa55 kien24 Mandarin - Hanyu Pinyin Hànzì Wénhuà Quān Min - Hokkien POJ hàn-jī bûn-huà-khuan Wu - Romanization hoe去 zy去 ven平 ho去 jioe上 Cantonese - Jyutping hon3 zi6 man4 faa3 hyun1
Japanese name
Kanji	漢字文化圏
Kana	かんじぶんかけん
Transliterations - Romaji kanji bunkaken
Korean name
Hangul	한자문화권
Hanja	漢字文化圈
Transliterations - Revised Romanization hanja munhwagwon
Vietnamese name
Quốc ngữ	Hán tự văn hoá khuyên[citation needed]

This article contains Chinese text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Chinese characters.

Sinosphere, also known as East Asian Cultural Sphere, Chinese world, Chinese cultural sphere or Chinese-character cultural sphere (simplified Chinese: 汉字文化圈; traditional Chinese: 漢字文化圏; pinyin: Hànzì Wénhuà Quān), a term coined by linguist James Matisoff, is a grouping of countries and regions that are currently inhabited with a majority Chinese population or were historically under heavy Chinese cultural influence. It is commonly used in areal linguistics to contrast with Indosphere, which refers to the cultures and languages influenced by proximity to India. James C. Bennett, founder of The Anglosphere Institute, sees it as a network commonwealth between Chinese people around the world. [1] Bennett envisages the Sinosphere as consisting of Greater China, and to some extent, its overseas Chinese population in Southeast Asia, notable countries like Malaysia and Singapore. One of the main unifying links is based on the Chinese language.

In East Asian commentator circles, the term Chinese cultural sphere or Chinese character cultural sphere is used interchangeably for Sinosphere but covering a broader definition. Chinese cultural sphere denotes a grouping of countries, regions, and people with Chinese cultural legacies. This includes the Sinosphere under the Bennett definition plus countries that have extensive Chinese cultural heritage including Japan, Korea (North and South), Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam. In French, the term le monde chinois (the Chinese world) is used for this concept.

Modern Origins: 1990s

The concept of Sinosphere, as a network commonwealth, predated the popularization of the modern idea of Anglosphere (simplified Chinese: 英语文化圈; traditional Chinese: 英語文化圈; pinyin: Yīngyǔ wénhuà quān, “English language cultural sphere”) in the English-speaking world, and developed largely independent of the Anglosphere. In the early post-Cold War period of the 1990s, economic reforms in the People's Republic of China, coupled with its recognition as a potent rival government of the Republic of China (Taiwan), increased economic and cultural exchanges between China and overseas Chinese itself, led to emergence of the concept of a network of Chinese people that transcend traditional national borders, political differences, and geographical distances.

Later on, this definition was broadened to include East Asian countries that had historical heritage influenced by China, countries such as Japan, North Korea, South Korea, Singapore and Vietnam have increased their economic and cultural contacts with the Chinese-speaking communities in both breadth and scope. This cultural region closely corresponds to the ancient Sinic civilization and its descendants, the Far Eastern civilizations (the Mainland and the Japanese ones), which Arnold J. Toynbee presented in the 1930s in "A Study of History", along with the Western, Islamic, Eastern Orthodox, Indic, etc. civilizations, among the major "units of study" of the world's history.^[1]

Sometimes in East Asia the term Sinosphere is used to imply the concept of East Asian integration.

Defining characteristics

Barbarians according to the Sinocentric world. Those in the east were called Dongyi (東夷), those in the west Xirong (西戎), those in the south Nanman (南蠻), and those in the north Beidi (北狄). The outward area of the Sinocentric influence were called Huawaizhidi (化外之地), which is one definition of the Sinosphere.^{[citation needed]}

Bennett considers the Sinosphere is unified by first language ability in Chinese. Asian commentators define the unifying factor as influence of traditional Chinese cultural beliefs, marked by Confucianist social and moral ethics, Taoist or Mahayana Buddhist religious beliefs, and the use of Chinese characters as a major part of writing system (Hanzi in Chinese, kanji in Japanese, hanja in Korean, and Hán tự in Vietnamese).

Another indicator is the everyday use of chopsticks, which also originate in China.

Current Developments

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008)

The concept of Sinosphere seemed to undergo a setback with the Asian financial crisis and the advent of the dotcom economies in 1997 and 1998. However, with China's membership in the WTO and continuing economic development there are some repopularizations of the use of the term Sinosphere.

The development of the Anglosphere provides an interesting contrast. The idea of a network commonwealth is common to both Sinosphere and Anglosphere, but the two visions were developed independently from each other. As of the first decade of the 21st century, the concept of the Anglosphere remains at large invisible among Asian commentators supportive of the Sinosphere. Among the few who have heard the concept, the common response is either derision or fear. Those who regard the Anglosphere with scorn take the route that regionalist consolidations will triumph over cultural affinities that are separated by geographical distances, and the Sinosphere is more consolidated on a geographical sense than the more dispersed Anglosphere, and also because they regard China's economic might will overtake the Anglosphere in the not too distant future. Detractors who see the Anglosphere as a threat to the Sinosphere regard the Anglosphere as a concept of Anglo-Saxon imperialism and hegemony, and translate the term into Chinese as 盎格魯共榮圈 (literally “Anglo-Saxon Co-Prosperity Sphere”) in an attempt to evoke the memory over the historical Japanese concept of a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere (Kyuujitai: 大東亞共榮圈) during the World War II. Some other commentators point out India is an Anglosphere member and it has the potential to overtake China in economic developments. Some also see the Anglosphere's flexible nature and civil society base as points of strengths that the Sinosphere lacks (James C. Bennett's Anglosphere Challenge) and which will guarantee it will pose a serious competition against the Sinosphere.

Currently Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea are contested by both Anglosphere and Sinosphere proponents as under each respective sphere of influence^{[citation needed]}. Singapore has a 76% Chinese majority, but its governmental, legal and business practice are more akin to English-speaking countries courtesy of its British colonial past. Hong Kong's position is similar to Singapore but its population is 98% Chinese and in Hong Kong, Chinese rather than English is commonly used as the daily communication medium. Japan has had ancient Chinese influence ever since the Taika Reform period; however, the Anglosphere has displaced China in influence from the time of Commodore Matthew Perry's visit in 1853. Post-World War II, Japanese political and military interests are generally aligned with the United States, and China is seen as Japan's strategic rival. The Korean Peninsula, which had also adopted ancient Chinese influences saw drastic changes through the post-Korean War era as two divided entities were formed. Although North Korea implemented a socialist regime and was an ally of the former Soviet bloc, South Korea's political, cultural, and legal policies grew more analogous with the United States and the Western World.

See also

• All under heaven
• Chinese Century
• East Asia
• Four Asian Tigers
• Foreign relations of Imperial China
• Greater China
• China proper
• History of China
• List of recipients of tribute from China
• List of tributaries of Imperial China
• Sinocentrism
• Sinoxenic
• Suzerainty
• Tributary state
• Anglosphere
• Ibero-America
• Indian cultural sphere
• Slavisphere
• Chinese World a journal created by Institut Choiseul for International Politics and Geoeconomics

References

• Ankerl, Guy. Global communication without universal civilization. INU societal research. Vol.1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations : Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western. Geneva: INU Press. ISBN 2-88155-004-5. 
• Joshua A. Fogel, Articulating the Sinosphere: Sino-Japanese Relations in Space and Time (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. Edwin O. Reischauer Lectures; 2007). ISBN 2008041259
• Developments, Exchanges, and Conflicts Between Eastern and Western Civilizations, Professor Lin Binye, East China Normal University, delivered 20 February 2002 at North Point Teachers Centre, Hong Kong (primary source material for the History and Culture subject curriculum developments, Education and Manpower Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government; Chinese)
• Chinese Cultural Sphere and the Use of Chinese Characters, Zhe Shiya, Lianhe Zaobao, 24 June 2004, Singapore (in Chinese)
• Export of Chinese Culture and Balance of Power in the World, Shinfeng, People's Daily, 28 March 2006, Beijing (in Chinese)

Further reading

• Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honor of James A. Matisoff, David Bradley, Randy J. LaPolla and Boyd Michailovsky eds., pp. 113–144. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. [2]