Socialism in One Country was a thesis developed by Nikolai Bukharin in
1925 and adopted as state policy by Joseph Stalin. The
thesis held that given the defeat of all communist revolutions in Europe from
1917–1921 except in
Russia, the Soviet Union should begin to strengthen itself internally. This theory
was in an opposition to Lenin's beliefs that while a revolution may happen in one
country, the final success of socialism in one country, especially in such a backward one as Russia is impossible without proletarian revolutions in other, advanced countries of Western Europe (see
"World revolution"). Mensheviks and Trotsky also came to the same conclusion, basing on Trotsky's theory of Permanent Revolution, disputed by Lenin.
Background
According to Stalin and his supporters, the idea of socialism in one country was strengthened by the defeat of several
proletarian revolutions in countries like Germany and Hungary, which ended Bolshevik hopes
for an imminent world revolution. Following those defeats, the Soviet Union changed the
focus of its external policy from the Third International to trade and peaceful relations with capitalist states.
In the first edition of the book Osnovy Leninizma (Foundations of Leninism, 1924),
Stalin was still a follower of Lenin's idea that revolution in one country is insufficient. But by the end of that year, in the
second edition of the book, his position started to turn around. "...proletariat can and
must build the socialist society in one country". In April 1925 Bukharin elaborated the issue in his brochure Can We Build Socialism in One Country in the Absence
of the Victory of the West-European Proletariat? The position was adopted as the state policy after Stalin's January 1926
article On the Issues of Leninism (К вопросам ленинизма).
In his 1915 article "On the Slogan for a United States of Europe", Lenin stated the following: "...Uneven economic and political
development is an absolute law of capitalism. Hence, the victory of socialism is possible first in several or even in one
capitalist country alone. After expropriating the capitalists and organising their own socialist production, the victorious
proletariat of that country will arise against the rest of the world ...". After Lenin's
death, Stalin used this quote to argue that Lenin shared his view of Socialism in One Country. Despite Stalin's stance,
the Soviet government under his leadership did provide aid to sympathising communists in other countries at various times.
Criticism and Reaction
The theory of Socialism in One Country was vigorously criticized by Zinoviev and
Trotsky. In particular, Trotskyists often claimed, and
still claim, that Socialism in One Country opposes both the basic tenets of Marxism and
Lenin's particular beliefs [1] that while a communist revolution may happen first in one
country, the final success of socialism in one country depends upon the revolution's degree of success in internationalizing itself and would ultimately be impossible without successful proletarian
revolutions in the more advanced countries of Western Europe. Trotskyists base their
criticism of Socialism in One Country on Trotsky's theory of Permanent Revolution,
which was meanwhile indeed disputed by Lenin as potentially reactionary during the time he
was alive because it appeared to discourage building socialism in the USSR at all, given that the hoped-for communist revolutions in more advanced countries like Germany and France had not been carried through. Trotsky believed that the development of the international division of labor made autarky, or economic isolation from the
world, economically reactionary in its own right. Yet, Trotsky acknowledged that dependence upon the international capitalist
market leads to economic plans becoming subordinate to world capitalism. He elaborated on these theses in his works The Draft
Program of the Communist International: A Criticism of Fundamentals and Permanent Revolution. Also, Trotskyists assert
that Stalin's support for the pro-Soviet section of the anti-fascist resistance forces in the Spanish Civil War was
actually hinged on suppression of any "truly revolutionary" activity that ran the risk of
delegitimizing what they characterize as his one-man dictatorship.
This was why, when it proved possible to build certain aspects of socialism in the Soviet Union despite such objections, it
temporarily threw Stalin's opposition into disarray. He later characterized Trotsky's position of Permanent Revolution as asking
the world to "wait" for Western workers and "simultaneous" global revolution, a position still carried by
anti-revisionists and other communists who oppose
Trotskyism today.
Stalin established several "communist states" in Eastern Europe after World War II, though some argue that this
action was motivated more by the desire to create Russian "satellite states" than to
spread the workers' revolution. In any case, neither the supporters of Stalin nor
those of Trotsky succeeded in starting a revolution in the West.
Quotes
"Will it be possible for this revolution to take place in one country alone?
No. By creating the world market, big industry has already brought all the peoples of the Earth, and especially the civilized
peoples, into such close relation with one another that none is independent of what happens to the others. Further, it has
co-ordinated the social development of the civilized countries to such an extent that, in all of them, bourgeoisie and
proletariat have become the decisive classes, and the struggle between them the great struggle of the day. It follows that the
communist revolution will not merely be a national phenomenon but must take place simultaneously in all civilized countries—that
is to say, at least in England, America, France, and Germany. It will develop in each of the these countries more or less
rapidly, according as one country or the other has a more developed industry, greater wealth, a more significant mass of
productive forces. Hence, it will go slowest and will meet most obstacles in Germany, most rapidly and with the fewest
difficulties in England. It will have a powerful impact on the other countries of the world, and will radically alter the course
of development which they have followed up to now, while greatly stepping up its pace. It is a universal revolution and will,
accordingly, have a universal range."
Friedrich Engels, The Principles of Communism,
1847
Notes and references
- ^ The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Government by V.I.
Lenin (1918). Lenin' Collected Works 4th English Edition, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1972 Volume 27, pages 235-77
External links
|
|
This section should be balanced out by including analyses of this concept from a Stalinist
and/or Maoist perspective. |
See also
|
Socialism by state |
| National
histories |
Socialism in the
Netherlands, History of socialism in Great Britain,
History of the Left in France, Socialism in the United States |
| National/Regional variants |
African
socialism, Arab socialism, Labor Zionism,
Melanesian socialism, Socialism with Chinese characteristics, Socialism in One
Country |
| Socialist
states |
Democratic
Republic of Afghanistan, Socialist People's Republic of
Albania, Azerbaijan People's Government, Bavarian Soviet Republic, Bukharan People's
Soviet Republic, People's Republic of China, Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Soviet Republic, German Democratic
Republic, Commune of the Working People of Estonia,
People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Far Eastern Republic, Finnish Democratic
Republic, Galician Soviet Socialist Republic, Hungarian Soviet Republic, Cambodia under
Pol Pot (1975-1979), Democratic Kampuchea, Cambodia
Under Vietnamese Occupation (1979-1989), Latvian Socialist Soviet
Republic, Mongolian People's Republic, Soviet Republic of Naissaar, People's Republic
of Poland, Communist Romania, Slovak
Soviet Republic, Socialist Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia, Soviet Union, Tuvinian
People's Republic, Republic of Užice, North
Vietnam, Republic of South Vietnam, South
Yemen |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)