Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Strato of Lampsacus

 
Philosophy Dictionary:

Strato of Lampsacus

(d. 269 BC) Head of the Peripatetic school after Theophrastus. He held a limited theory of the void as a kind of porosity in space. He also argued against the universal teleology of the Stoics, although it is not known to what extent he rejected Aristotelian teleological thinking in biology.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Wikipedia:

Strato of Lampsacus

Top
Strato of Lampsacus
Western Philosophy
Ancient philosophy

Strato, depicted as a medieval scholar in the Nuremberg Chronicle
Full name Strato of Lampsacus
Born c. 335 BC
Lampsacus
Died c. 269 BC
Athens
School/tradition Peripateticism
Main interests Natural philosophy, Physics

Strato of Lampsacus (or Straton, Greek: Στράτων; c. 335-c. 269 BC) was a Peripatetic philosopher, and the third director (scholarch) of the Lyceum after the death of Theophrastus. He devoted himself especially to the study of natural science, and increased the naturalistic elements in Aristotle's thought to such an extent, that he denied the need for a god to construct the universe, preferring to place the government of the universe in the unconscious force of nature alone.

Contents

Life

Strato, son of Arcesilaus or Arcesius, was born at Lampsacus between 340 and 330 BC.[1] It is not impossible that he might have known Epicurus during his period of teaching in Lampsacus between 310 and 306.[1] He attended Aristotle's school in Athens, after which he left Athens and went to Egypt where he was the tutor of Ptolemy Philadelphus and also taught Aristarchus of Samos. He returned to Athens after the death of Theophrastus (c. 287 BC) and was chosen as his successor. He died sometime between 270 and 268 BC,[1] and was succeeded as head of the Lyceum by Lyco of Troas.

Strato devoted himself especially to the study of natural science, whence he obtained, or, as it appears from Cicero, assumed the name of Physicus (Greek: Φυσικός). Cicero, while speaking highly of his talents, blames him for neglecting the most important part of philosophy, that which concerns virtue and morals, and giving himself up to the investigation of nature.[2] In the long list of his works, given by Diogenes Laërtius, several of the titles are upon subjects of moral philosophy, but the great majority belong to the department of physical science. None of his writings survive, his views are known only from the fragmentary reports preserved by later writers.

Philosophy

Aristotle, Theophrastus, and Strato. Part of a fresco in the National University of Athens.

Strato emphasized the need for exact research,[3] and, as an example of this, he made use of the observation of how water pouring from a spout breaks into separate droplets as evidence that falling bodies accelerate.[4]

Whereas Aristotle defined time as the numbered aspect of motion,[5] Strato argued that because motion and time are continuous whereas number is discrete, time has an existence independent of motion.[6] He was critical of Aristotle's concept of place as a surrounding surface,[7] preferring to see it as the space which a thing occupies.[8] He also rejected the existence of Aristotle's fifth element.[9]

He emphasized the role of pneuma, ('breath' or 'spirit') in the functioning of the soul; soul-activities were explained by pneuma extending throughout the body from the 'ruling part' located in the head.[10] All sensation is felt in the ruling-part of the soul, rather than in the extremities of the body; all sensation involves thought, and there is no thought not derived from sensation.[11] He denied that the soul was immortal, and attacked the 'proofs' put forward by Plato in his Phaedo.[3]

Strato believed all matter consisted of tiny particles, but he rejected Democritus' theory of empty space. In Strato's view, void does exist, but only in the empty spaces between imperfectly fitting particles; Space is always filled with some kind of matter.[12] Such a theory permitted phenomena such as compression, and allowed the penetration of light and heat through apparently solid bodies.[7]

The opinions of Strato have given rise to much controversy; but unfortunately the result has been very unsatisfactory on account of lack of information. He seems to have denied the existence of any god outside of the material universe, and to have held that every particle of matter has a plastic and seminal power, but without sensation or intelligence; and that life, sensation, and intellect, are but forms, accidents, and affections of matter.

Nor does his pupil Strato, who is called the natural philosopher, deserve to be listened to; he holds that all divine force is resident in nature, which contains, he says, the principles of birth, increase, and decay, but which lacks, as we could remind him, all sensation and form.[13]

Like the atomists (Leucippus and Democritus) before him, Strato of Lampsacus was a materialist and believed that everything in the universe was composed of matter and energy. Strato was one of the first philosophers to formulate an atheistic worldview, in which God is merely the unconscious force of nature.

You deny that without God there can be anything: but here you yourself seem to go contrary to Strato of Lampsacus, who concedes to God a pardon from a great task. If the priests of God were on vacation, it is much more just that the Gods would also be on vacation; in fact he denies the need to appreciate the work of the Gods in order to construct the world. All the things that exist he teaches have been produced by nature; not hence, as he says, according to that philosophy which claims these things are made of rough and smooth corpuscles, indented and hooked, the void interfering; these, he upholds, are dreams of Democritus which are not to be taught but dreamt. Strato, in fact, investigating the individual parts of the world, teaches that all that which is or is produced, is or has been produced, by weight and motion. Thus he liberates God from a big job and me from fear.[14]

Strato endeavoured to replace the Aristotelian teleology by a purely physical explanation of phenomena, the underlying elements of which he found in heat and cold, with especially heat as the active principle.[3] Although Strato's view of the universe can be seen as atheistic, he would probably have accepted the existence of lesser gods within the universe, and in the context of Greek religion it is unlikely that he would have regarded himself as an atheist.[15]

Modern era

Strato's name meant little in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, however, in the 17th century his name suddenly became famous because of the supposed similarities between his system and the pantheistic views of Spinoza.[16] Ralph Cudworth, in choosing to attack atheism in 1678, chose Strato's system as one of four types of atheism, and in doing so, coined the term hylozoism to describe any system where primitive matter is endowed with a life-force.[17] These ideas reached Pierre Bayle, who adopted Strato and 'Stratonism' as key components of his own philosophy.[18] In his Continuation des Pensees diverses, published in 1705, Stratonism had become the most important ancient equivalent of Spinozism.[19] For Bayle, Strato had made everything follow a fixed order of necessity, with no innate good or bad in the universe; the universe is not a living thing with intelligence or intent, and there is no other divine power but nature.[20]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c Dorandi 2005, p. 36
  2. ^ Cicero, Acad. Quaest. i. 9; de Finibus, v. 5.
  3. ^ a b c Zeller, Nestle & Palmer 2000, p. 204
  4. ^ "This experiment goes back to a passage in Simplicius' Commentary on the Physics, where it is said that Strato of Lampsacus, had offered this "experiment" of pouring water from a spout as evidence of the fact that falling bodies are accelerated." Grant 1974, p. 227
  5. ^ Aristotle, Physics, 4.11 219b5
  6. ^ Furley 2003, p. 156
  7. ^ a b Furley 2005, p. 416
  8. ^ Furley 2003, p. 157
  9. ^ Furley 2005, p. 417
  10. ^ Furley 2003, p. 162
  11. ^ Furley 2003, p. 163
  12. ^ Algra 1995, p. 58ff
  13. ^ Cicero, De Natura Deorum, i. 13.
  14. ^ Cicero, Lucullus, 121. quoted in Reale & Catan 1985, p. 103
  15. ^ Israel 2006, p. 454
  16. ^ Israel 2006, p. 445
  17. ^ Erdmann 2002, p. 101
  18. ^ Israel 2006, p. 447
  19. ^ Israel 2006, p. 450
  20. ^ Israel 2006, p. 451

References

  • Algra, Keimpe (1995), Concepts of Space in Greek Thought, BRILL 
  • Dorandi, Tiziano (2005), "Chronology", in Algra, Keimpe; Barnes, Jonathon; Mansfeld, Jaap et al., The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521616700 
  • Erdmann, Johann Eduard (2002), A History of Philosophy, Anmol Publications 
  • Furley, David (2003), From Aristotle to Augustine: Routledge History of Philosophy, Volume 2, Routledge 
  • Furley, David (2005), "Cosmology", in Algra, Keimpe; Barnes, Jonathon; Mansfeld, Jaap et al., The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521616700 
  • Grant, Edward (1974), A Source Book in Medieval Science, Harvard University Press 
  • Israel, Jonathan Irvine (2006), Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, Oxford University Press 
  • Reale, Giovanni; Catan, John R. (1985), A History of Ancient Philosophy, Vol 3, SUNY Press 
  • Zeller, Eduard; Nestle, Wilhelm; Palmer, Leonard (2000), Outlines of the history of Greek philosophy, Routledge 

External links


 
 
Learn More
Stratonician presumption (philosophy)
Peripatetic school (philosophy)
Peripatetics (organization – in education, history)

Is strato and composite the same thing? Read answer...
Words that begin with strato? Read answer...
What does a strato - volcano look like? Read answer...

Help us answer these
Is mt pinatuba a strato or composite?
Can a strato volcano eruped agian?
Where can you get elemental hero stratos?

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Strato of Lampsacus" Read more