| Swain v. Alabama | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued December 8, 1964 Decided March 8, 1965 |
||||||
| Full case name | Robert Swain v. Alabama | |||||
| Citations | 380 U.S. 202 (more) | |||||
| Holding | ||||||
| The overall percentage disparity has been small and reflects no studied attempt to include or exclude a specified number of blacks. | ||||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | White | |||||
|
Overruled by
|
||||||
| Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) | ||||||
Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965), was a case heard before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the legality of a struck jury.
Swain, a black man, was indicted and convicted of rape in the Circuit Court of Talladega County, Alabama, and sentenced to death. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that there were no black jurors. Of eligible jurors in the county, 26% were black, but panels since 1953 averaged 10% to 15% black jurors.
The Supreme Court denied the appeal, because 8 of 100 empaneled jurors were black, but all were "struck" by peremptory challenges by the prosecution. The ruling for the majority stated, "The overall percentage disparity has been small and reflects no studied attempt to include or exclude a specified number of blacks."
This case recognized the peremptory challenge as a valid legal practice so long as it was not used intentionally to exclude blacks from jury duties.
The precedent was overturned in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).
See also
Further reading
- Sommers, Samuel R.; Norton, Michael I. (2007). "Race-Based Judgments, Race-Neutral Justifications: Experimental Examination of Peremptory Use and the Batson Challenge Procedure". Law and Human Behavior 31 (3): 261–273. doi:.
External links
- Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965)
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
