Results for Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous
On this page:
 
Irish Literature Companion:

Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous

Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous (1713), by George Berkeley, expounding his doctrine that physical objects are dependent on mind.

 
 
Wikipedia: Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous

Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous is a book written by George Berkeley in 1713.


Three important concepts discussed in the Three Dialogues are perceptual relativity, the conceivability/master argument ("master argument" was coined by André Gallois[1]), and Berkeley's phenomenalism.

Perceptual relativity argues that the same object can appear to have different characteristics (e.g. shape) depending on the observer's perspective. Since objective features of objects cannot change without an inherent change in the object itself, shape must not be an objective feature.

Hylas and Philonous

Berkeley uses Hylas as his primary contemporary philosophical adversary. A Hylas is featured in Greek mythology and is understood to represent John Locke. In the Dialogues, the name Hylas is derived from an ancient Greek word for "matter," which Hylas argues for in the dialogue.

Using Philonous Berkeley argues his own metaphysical views, which were first developed in his earlier book A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Philonous translates as "lover of mind."

In The First Dialogue, Hylas expresses his disdain for skepticism, adding that he has heard Philonous to have "maintained the most extravagant opinion... namely, that there is no such thing as material substance in the world." Philonous argues that it is actually Hylas who is the skeptic and that he can prove it. Thus, a philosophical battle of wit begins.

Philonous questions Hylas systematically regarding what humans know of the world, first examining secondary qualities, such as heat, to show that such qualities do not exist outside the individual mind. He then moves on to primary qualities such as extension and shape, and likewise argues that they, too, are dependent entirely on one's perception (e.g., From a distance, a great mountain appears to be small, and the shape of a thing may change dramatically under a microscope).

Other views

The philosopher Mario Bunge and others have published papers and books refuting Berkeley's phenomenalism.[2][3]

References

  1. ^ A. Gallois, "Berkeley's Master Argument." The Philosophical Review 83 (1974), pp. 55-69
  2. ^ Bunge, Mario (Dec, 1954). "New Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (2): 192-199. 
  3. ^ Bunge, Mario (2006), Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism, Toronto: University of Toronto Press

See also

External links


 
 

Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous" at WikiAnswers.

 

Copyrights:

Irish Literature Companion. The Concise Oxford Companion to Irish Literature. Copyright © 1996, 2000, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous" Read more

Search for answers directly from your browser with the FREE Answers.com Toolbar!  
Click here to download now. 

Get Answers your way! Check out all our free tools and products.

On this page:   E-mail   print Print  Link  

 

Keep Reading

Mentioned In: