Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

UAAP Final Four

 
Wikipedia: UAAP Final Four

The UAAP Final Four most often refers to the playoffs of the University Athletic Association of the Philippines (UAAP) men's basketball tournament.

The term "final four" came from National Collegiate Athletic Association of the United States' men's Division I basketball tournament which is colloquially called as the "final four".

Contents

History

The Final Four tournament was instituted in the 1993–94 season in which the four teams (out of eight) with the best records qualify for the postseason tournament. Previously the postseason was a championship series among the top two teams, with the #1 seeded team holding the twice to beat advantage, in which they have to win only once to clinch the championship, while the #2 team has to win twice.

The tournament would be conducted in two stages:

  • The semifinals retained the old format, although both #1 and #2 teams now possess the twice to beat advantage, while the #3 and #4 has to win twice.
  • The finals is a best of three series.

However, the University of Santo Tomas swept the 1993 elimination round, and following then existing rules, the Glowing Goldies won the championship outright. After that season, the UAAP revised the rule, in which the team that swept the finals will advance to the best-of-3 finals immediately, while the #2 team has the twice to beat advantage in the semifinals where it waits for the winner of the game between the #3 and #4 team.[1]

With no team sweeping the elimination round in the 1994-95 season, the format was first used. However, on the 2007 season, the University of the East (UE) swept the eliminations, causing the sweep clause to be used; with two tie-breaker games, the unavailability of the Araneta Coliseum, and the semifinals lasting two games, 21 days have past since UE's last elimination round game. The rust accumulated caused them to lose the championship series 2–0 against La Salle (their last elimination round opponent). As a result, the Policy Board formulated the "bonus rule" in which the team that sweeps the elimination round will still qualify for the Finals outright but will only need to win twice; the other finalist needs to win thrice. Thus, giving the sweeper a 1-0 lead in a virtual best-of-five.[2]

For the men's tournament, ties among the semifinalists were broken by an extra game, irrespective of the seedings. Ergo, in a tie for the 2nd seed, the game that will be used to break the tie serves as a de facto game one of a best-of-three series. If two teams are tied for the fourth seed, the game that will be used to break the tie serves as a knockout game between the two. If three or more teams are tied, usually the team with the the best points difference gets a bye to the final tiebreaker game against the winner/s of the teams with the lower points difference. Starting in the 2009–10 season, the league will abolish the tiebreaker games and instead will use "common sense" in determining seedings for the playoffs.[3]

In juniors' and women's tournaments, only ties for second and fourth are broken by basis of an extra game. Ties for first and third are broken by the points difference of the tied teams.

Format

  • If no team sweeps the elimination round:
    • Seeds #1 and #2 teams possess the twice to beat advantage
    • Team #1 meets #4 while #2 meets #3 in the semifinals.
    • The semifinal winners advance to the Finals.
    • The team that wins 2 games in the Finals wins the championship.
  • If a team sweeps the elimination round:
    • Seed #1 advance to the Finals.
    • Seed #2 advance to the semifinals with the twice to beat advantage.
    • Teams #3 and #4 face off to meet #2 in the semifinals in a one-game playoff.
    • In the finals, the #1 seed only has to win twice, while the other opponent has to win thrice.
  • In case of two teams being tied, an extra game will be played to determine which seed they will possess.
  • In case of three or more teams being tied, the team with the best head-to-head record usually possesses the best seeding, while the other teams will play an extra game to determine the second-best seeding,

Results

Television and radio

The Final Four is the culmination of the UAAP basketball season and is heavily covered by the media. With the UAAP as the one of the leading collegiate leagues in the country, the Final Four games are broadcast live throughout the country.

Beginning on 2000, the UAAP, and the Final Four games, were broadcast by ABS-CBN's UHF channel Studio 23 nationwide, being produced by ABS-CBN Sports. Prior to Studio 23, the games were broadcast by Silverstar Sports on the state-controlled People's Television VHF channel 4.

Prior to 2001, the games were also aired live on DZSR Sports Radio 918-AM; after ABS-CBN's takeover of broadcast rights, its Manila FM station 101.9 For Life! airs updates during and after the games, but not blow-by-blow coverages.

Statistics

Appearances

Team Semifinal
appearances
Last semis
appearance
First semis
appearance
Finals
appearances
Highest
seed
Adamson school colors Adamson 1 2006 2006 - 4th
Ateneo school colors Ateneo 11 2009 1999 6 1st
La Salle school colors La Salle 14 2008 1994 13 1st
FEU school colors FEU 12 2009 1994 6 1st
NU school colors NU 1 2001 2001 - 4th
UE school colors UE 12 2009 1994 2 1st
UP school colors UP 2 1997 1996 - 3rd
UST school colors UST 11 2009 1994 5 1st

Notes:

  • Number of appearance excludes 4th seed elimination games.

Best performances

Champion
Runner-up
Twice to beat advantage
Semifinalist
Qualified for 4th-seed playoff
Suspended
Not in the league
1 Semifinals seed
School Year
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Adamson school colors Adamson 4
Ateneo school colors Ateneo 3 2 2 3 1 3 3 1 3 1 1
La Salle school colors La Salle 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 2
FEU school colors FEU 4 4 1 2 4 3 3 2 1 1 3 2
NU school colors NU 4
UE school colors UE 2 3 4 3 2 3 4 4 2 1 4 3
UP school colors UP 3 4
UST school colors UST 3 1 2 2 4 2 4 4 3 4 4


Series statistics

Semifinals

Team Pld W L PCT
La Salle school colors La Salle 14 13 1 0.983
Ateneo school colors Ateneo 11 7 4 0.636
FEU school colors FEU 12 6 6 0.500
UST school colors UST 11 5 6 0.455
Adamson school colors Adamson 1 0 1 0.000
NU school colors NU 1 0 1 0.000
UP school colors UP 2 0 2 0.000
UE school colors UE 12 2 10 0.091

Finals

Team Pld W L PCT
UST school colors UST 5 4 1 0.800
FEU school colors FEU 6 4 2 0.667
Ateneo school colors Ateneo 6 3 3 0.500
La Salle school colors La Salle 13 5 8 0.385
UE school colors UE 2 0 2 0.000
Adamson school colors Adamson 0 -- -- --
NU school colors NU 0 -- -- --
UP school colors UP 0 -- -- --

Finals statistics

  • Most lopsided game: La Salle 72-47 FEU, 1998 Game 1 (25 points)
  • Closest game: Several games, all one-point leads:
    • UST 77-76 La Salle, 1994 Game 3
    • FEU 65-64 La Salle, 1997 Game 2 (championship clincher)
    • Ateneo 73-72 UST, 2006 Game 1
    • La Salle 64-63 UE, 2007 Game 1
  • Finals appearances: La Salle, 12
  • Consecutive finals appearances: La Salle, 9 (1994-2002)
  • Championships: UST (1993-96, 2006) and La Salle (1998-2001, 2007), 5 (including UST's 1993 sweep)
  • Consecutive championships: UST (1993-96) and La Salle (1998-2001), 4
  • As of 2008, the winner of Game 1 won the championship 10 times out of 15.

Semifinals

  • Most lopsided game: La Salle 111-85 NU, 2001 (26 points)
  • Closest game: Several games, all one-point leads.
  • Semifinal appearances: La Salle, 14 (1994-2005, 2007-08; qualified in all seasons they've participated)
  • Consecutive semifinal appearances: La Salle, 12 (1994-2005)

Most frequent matchups

The five most frequently played matchups are:

Matchup Semifinals Finals Total
Ateneo vs. La Salle 3 4 7
La Salle vs. UST 4 3 7
FEU vs. La Salle 3 4 7
FEU vs. UE 4 0 4
Ateneo vs. FEU 2 1 3

Seeds

In the 15 tournaments the Final Four format has been applied, the higher seed has beaten the lower seeds in the semifinals due to their twice to beat advantage, for the most part:

  1. The #1 seed has beaten the #4 seed all 15 times (100%).
    • The #1 seed has beaten the #4 seed 3 times on the second game (23%)
  2. The #2 seed has beaten the #3 seed 9 times (60%).
    • The #2 seed has beaten the #3 seed 6 times on the second game (43%).
      • Out of those 6 times the #2 seed was beaten, the #2 seed was UE thrice.
  3. The #3 seed has beaten the #4 times once
    • With UE sweeping the elimination round, there were two semifinal rounds for 2007.
  4. The #1 seed skipped the semifinals once (7%; in 2007, when UE swept the elimination round)

A victory of the #3 seed in a series is considered a big upset considering that the #3 seed has to win twice, not to mention the perceived superiority of the #2 seed when compared to the #3 seed.

In the finals, the advantage of the #1 seed isn't as pronounced since the competing teams have to win the same number of games:

  1. The #1 seed has beaten the #2 seed 6 times (43%)
  2. The #1 seed has beaten the #3 seed 3 times (21%)
  3. The #2 seed has beaten the #1 seed 2 times (14%)
  4. The #3 seed has beaten the #1 seed 3 times (21%)
  5. The #1 seed has won the championship 9 times (64%)

Individual single-game records

Stats since the 2001 season.

Statistic Name Total School Opponent Stage
Most points Ken Bono 33 Adamson school colors Adamson Ateneo school colors Ateneo 2006 Semifinals
Most rebounds Jervy Cruz 18 UST school colors UST UE school colors UE 2006 Semifinals
Most assists Macky Escalona
Mike Cortez
Mike Cortez
9 Ateneo school colors Ateneo
La Salle school colors La Salle
La Salle school colors La Salle
Adamson school colors Adamson
Ateneo school colors Ateneo
NU school colors NU
2006 Semiinals
2002 Finals
2001 Semifinals
Most steals Elmer Espiritu
Pocholo Villanueva
5 UE school colors UE
La Salle school colors La Salle
Ateneo school colors Ateneo
UE school colors UE
2008 Semifinals
2007 Finals
Most blocks Nonoy Baclao 7 Ateneo school colors Ateneo La Salle school colors La Salle 2008 Finals

See also

References

  1. ^ UE completes 14-0, but barely by Jasmine Payo, Philippine Daily Inquirer. Published 09/14/2007, accessed 1/1/2007.
  2. ^ Additional incentive for UAAP sweep by Jasmine Payo, Philippine Daily Inquirer. Published 6/28/2008, accessed 6/28/2008.
  3. ^ Villar, Joey (13 June 2009). "UAAP okays rules on tiebreak, instant replay". The Philippine Star (ngetstudio.com). http://www.ngetstudio.com/UAAP/news/?id=e9ef41af-863e-462d-a322-3557327bf6c8. Retrieved 20 June 2009. 

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "UAAP Final Four" Read more