Wabash Case

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 14–15, 1886 Decided October 25, 1886
Full case name	Wabash, St. L. & P. RY. Co. v. People of State of Illinois
Holding
The Court held that Illinois had violated the Commerce Clause by placing a direct burden on interstate commerce. Under the Commerce Clause only Congress had the power to do so and states could only place indirect burdens on commerce.
Court membership
Chief Justice Morrison Waite Associate Justices Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field Joseph P. Bradley · John M. Harlan William B. Woods · T. Stanley Matthews Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford
Case opinions
Majority	Miller, joined by Field, Harlan, Woods, Matthews, Blatchford
Dissent	Waite, joined by Bradley, Gray
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois, 118 U.S. 557 (1886)^[1], also known as the Wabash Case, Joe, or Adam, was a Supreme Court decision that severely limited the rights of states to control interstate commerce. It led to the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission.

The court

The majority's opinion was written by Justice Samuel Miller; joining him were Justices Stephen Field, John Harlan, William Woods, Thomas Matthews, and Samuel Blatchford. Dissenting were Chief Justice Morrison Waite and Justices Joseph Bradley and Horace Gray.

The case

The case was argued on April 14, 1886-April 15, 1886 and was decided on October 25, 1886 by vote of 6 to 3. Associate Justice Miller wrote for the Court with Associate Justices Field, Harlan, Woods, Matthews, and Blatchford concurring; Associate Justices Bradley and Gray, along with Chief Justice Waite, dissented.

In Wabash, "direct" burdens on interstate commerce (noting, however, that "indirect" burdens were permitted under the Commerce Clause). This was a standard enacted in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852).

Effects of decision

• The Wabash decision led to the creation of the first modern regulatory agency, the Interstate Commerce Commission.
• It clarified the "direct" v. "indirect" test (though this doctrine was abandoned in the 1930s).
• It was one of the first instances in government assuming responsibility for economic affairs that had previously been delegated to the states.

See also

• Munn v. Illinois
• List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 118

External links

• ^  Text of Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois , 118 U.S. 557 (1886) is available from:  · Enfacto · Findlaw

• Supreme Court cases citing Wabash
• Case summary from Bartleby.com

References

• "Wabash Case". InfoPlease Encyclopedia. http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0851226.html. Retrieved on March 1 2005.